Jump to content

2021 7th round pick (197): Connor Pavolony - C - (Junior) Tennessee


Recommended Posts

  • lovetoaster changed the title to 2021 7th round pick (197): Connor Pavolony - C - (Junior) Tennessee
Quote

Catcher Connor Pavolony was a major part of Vitello’s rebuild, starting behind the plate for three years. The junior hit .260 with seven home runs in 49 games while dealing with a plethora of minor injuries and a fractured hand that sidelined him in SEC play.

https://www.rockytopinsider.com/2021/07/11/tennessee-baseball-players-commits-to-watch-for-in-mlb-draft/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Pavolony got off to a slow start at the plate and battled injuries as a junior, but his batting average climbed significantly later in the year despite a sore hand, and he’s still seen as a solid prospect heading into this draft. He has one of the strongest arms of any catcher in this class, and it’s a shame that a hand injury prevented him from consistently showing that down the stretch in 2021. Pavolony could go a bit higher than expected, though, because he has great defensive skills and some offensive power potential for that position. Some of Pavolony’s home runs at Tennessee were tape-measure shots. Scouts tend to notice those things.

https://247sports.com/college/tennessee/LongFormArticle/Tennessee-Vols-Baseball-Vols-players-signees-to-watch-for-in-2021-MLB-Draft-167600614/#167600614_4

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah, I'm not seeing the overslot guys that we did last year.

Maybe because last year was such a short draft it was more obvious as to who those guys were.  

I wrote it earlier, but Shepherd and Faleris were going back and forth on twitter yesterday saying they didn't think Cowser was an under slot guy.

Sounds like the kid from Kentucky might not be either. 

My guess is Elias thinks he got his Jordan Westburg in one of these 3-5 round guys. By that, I mean athletic guy who's just scratching the surface on what he can be.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

Many of the earlier picks have been helium guys who came on strong this year. Pavolony was the opposite, was on all sorts of watch lists entering the season, then had a middling year. 

That's called hedging your bet.  Brilliant.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Has a chance to advance in the next few weeks after tonight's signing.    2 Class A catchers - Cannon and Handley - hurt.   Delmarva currently featuring a guy out of DSL/FCL and Ogren, converted this year to backstop.   Aberdeen has non-touted Rodriguez just promoted and Burgess, batting .091, (not a misprint).    You would think a brief stint in FCL would lead to Class A soon.  

Edited by Dreadnought
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Dreadnought said:

Has a chance to advance in the next few weeks after tonight's signing.    2 Class A catchers - Cannon and Handley - hurt.   Delmarva currently featuring a guy out of DSL/FCL and Ogren, converted this year to backstop.   Aberdeen has non-touted Rodriguez just promoted and Burgess, batting .091, (not a misprint).    You would think a brief stint in FCL would lead to Class A soon.  

What happened to Cannon and Handley?   Are they out for a long time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Frobby said:

What happened to Cannon and Handley?   Are they out for a long time?

The Orioles are not giving out information on player injuries. They are being treated as state secrets for some reason. Its silly. 

Back to Pavolony though, I could see him going to Delmarva pretty quickly because his defense and current injury situation at the catcher's position within the organization. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

The Orioles are not giving out information on player injuries. They are being treated as state secrets for some reason. Its silly. 

Back to Pavolony though, I could see him going to Delmarva pretty quickly because his defense and current injury situation at the catcher's position within the organization. 

From the Todd Karpovich article quoting Cannon, "As for Cannon, he is still nursing a hamstring injury from earlier this month against Lynchburg. He heard a pop as he was running for first base and then had trouble walking."  

Handley didn't look comfortable his last AB on 16th (where he did a late check swing).  Ironbirds put him on 7 day IL on the 20th so he could return on Wednesday the 28th.    Having watch the Ironbirds put him back into games/series early in the year when he clearly wasn't healthy makes me think the medical staff if finally protecting the players by placing them on IL

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...