Jump to content

What other minor leaguers do you want to know about?


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

At one point he was rated higher than Wander Franco in the Rays’ system. Also a former top 100 prospect. He seems toolsy as all get out. I like him just like Mateo. We should be looking at “high upside” players. 

This should tell you everything you need to know about most national prospect publications/evaluators.

When i saw Franco this year against the Tides, it was clear the guy is a future star. Fox might have tools, but we have years of stats to tell us he can't hit despite the tools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

This should ell you everything you need to know about most national prospect publications/evaluators.

When i saw Franco this year against the Tides, it was clear the guy is a future star. Fox might have tools, but we have years of stats to tell us he can't hit despite the tools.

So Fox is more like Freddy Bynum than Mateo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

So Fox is more like Freddy Bynum than Mateo?

For me, yes. But I'm only going by the stats as I've never seen Fox play. Remember, Mateo was at a .267/.325  /.422/.747 hitter over his minor league career. Mateo has a little pop too, where Fox doesn't. Fox is like Mateo-lite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

At one point he was rated higher than Wander Franco in the Rays’ system. 

You mean when Wander was a fetus?

I’m only half-joking.   Wander was ranked #96 by BA before he’d played a professional game, before he’d turned 17.  After one pro season at age 17 in the lowly Appy League, he was jumped to no. 4.  Fox was never ranked by BA, though pre-2019 he was ranked 79 by BP (and Franco was ranked 13 by BP at the time).    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2021 at 4:42 PM, justD said:

I enjoyed watching Connor Pavolony. I heard the coaches like his arm. Does he have any potential to become a viable backup catcher?

The early results were not good on either part of his game, but let's see what he looks like after a full season. Nothing jumped out at me in my early looks, but you never know. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2021 at 2:52 PM, Tony-OH said:

Handley is what he was advertised defensively but he can't hit. Probably the best overall defender at catcher in the system, better than Rutschman especially throwing, but he's been pretty much a zero at the plate. 

Daschbach is a bit of stiff power guy for me. More muscle power than quick bat, he did show nice power at Bowie but it came at a price. Not sure he's going to be able to show a consistent enough stick for 1B and he's Mancini like outfielder.

I think you are giving Maverick Handley the short end of the stick...  Pun intended.  I have followed him (and Adley) since there time in the Pac12.  Defensively, Maverick's defense will help win more games than Adley's.  Offensively, without a doubt, Adley has the gifts for his bat to help win more games.  If statistics are true, Aberdeen was the LAST PLACE ballpark for batting average (but had a high HR rate) since they remodeled the field and lights before this season.  It had more to do with than just the worst hitting coach (1st one fired at end of season)

Here is an example:

Gunnar Henderson played at 3 levels and every day.  Of his 65 games played for Aberdeen, 29 were away and 36 were at home.  Gunnar hit 0.192 at home and 0.271 on the road.  His OPS was 0.718 at home and 0.835 on the road. 

Maverick played 70 games for Aberdeen.  27 home and 33 away.  He hit 0.125 at home and 0.261 away.  His OPS was only 0.446 at home but 0.835 away.

With Adley starting at AA before moving to AAA, and then Handley getting injured, it appears he never got the chance to move up.

While his average didn't change much overall, his OBP, SLG, OPS all went up while his SO rate went down.  

Tells me... pegging his bat as dead may be a bit premature.  If he continues to put the work in at Driveline out in Kent, WA (there is a good blog from them on what he did last offseason) and gets stronger, heals up, and doesn't get stuck back in Aberdeen, he may be able to get the reps in and make it to AAA before end of 2022.

I think he will continue to improve, I just don't know if the Orioles will make him a Rule 5 protected player in 2022... or even what that will be like after the new CBA.  His defense can definitely play at the MLB level... but he has to get his reps in and work his way up.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CHIP said:

I think you are giving Maverick Handley the short end of the stick...  Pun intended.  I have followed him (and Adley) since there time in the Pac12.  Defensively, Maverick's defense will help win more games than Adley's.  Offensively, without a doubt, Adley has the gifts for his bat to help win more games.  If statistics are true, Aberdeen was the LAST PLACE ballpark for batting average (but had a high HR rate) since they remodeled the field and lights before this season.  It had more to do with than just the worst hitting coach (1st one fired at end of season)

Here is an example:

Gunnar Henderson played at 3 levels and every day.  Of his 65 games played for Aberdeen, 29 were away and 36 were at home.  Gunnar hit 0.192 at home and 0.271 on the road.  His OPS was 0.718 at home and 0.835 on the road. 

Maverick played 70 games for Aberdeen.  27 home and 33 away.  He hit 0.125 at home and 0.261 away.  His OPS was only 0.446 at home but 0.835 away.

With Adley starting at AA before moving to AAA, and then Handley getting injured, it appears he never got the chance to move up.

While his average didn't change much overall, his OBP, SLG, OPS all went up while his SO rate went down.  

Tells me... pegging his bat as dead may be a bit premature.  If he continues to put the work in at Driveline out in Kent, WA (there is a good blog from them on what he did last offseason) and gets stronger, heals up, and doesn't get stuck back in Aberdeen, he may be able to get the reps in and make it to AAA before end of 2022.

I think he will continue to improve, I just don't know if the Orioles will make him a Rule 5 protected player in 2022... or even what that will be like after the new CBA.  His defense can definitely play at the MLB level... but he has to get his reps in and work his way up.   

You seem to be very close Handley and it's understandable why you are supportive. Saying that, it's silly to say Handley's defense will win more games in the big leagues than Rutschman's bat.

Aberdeen is a tough place to hit home runs because of its deep power alleys so its normal to see ISOs go down there, but Handley has slashed .201/.310/.300/.610 in 365 PAs so far in his professional career with a 38-118 K-BB ratio. He has a 29.4% K rate and just a 6.2% walk rate. Par effects has nothing to do with that.

He was 23 years old in High-A ball and put up a park adjusted 83 wRC+. 

Now I only bring this up because it goes to show that its not just because he's only played Aberdeen. He just hasn't hit. 

Now can he improve? Sure. Is his defense major league quality? Sure, I'd say he could play defensively in the major leagues, but he's got to at least be able to hit some.

Could he potentially improve enough where he could be a back up to Rutschman one day? Potentially. But he's going to have to rework his hitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, interloper said:

Eh, I think basically they already know they'll be DFAing Martin at some point this off-season, or something along those lines. Just a flyer guy you can bring into ST who is young and has an option. 

Fox will probably be DFA soon I'm an attempt to sneak him through waivers

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

You seem to be very close Handley and it's understandable why you are supportive. Saying that, it's silly to say Handley's defense will win more games in the big leagues than Rutschman's bat.

That’s not what he said.   

“Defensively, Maverick's defense will help win more games than Adley's.  Offensively, without a doubt, Adley has the gifts for his bat to help win more games.”
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

That’s not what he said.   

“Defensively, Maverick's defense will help win more games than Adley's.  Offensively, without a doubt, Adley has the gifts for his bat to help win more games.”
 

Got it, thanks. 

It doesn't change anything else I wrote though unfortunately. I'm rooting for the kid's bat to develop but I don't hold out a lot of hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Got it, thanks. 

It doesn't change anything else I wrote though unfortunately. I'm rooting for the kid's bat to develop but I don't hold out a lot of hope.

Yeah, it is a shame the bat is so uninspiring.   Let’s hope that he makes headway this winter and comes back improved.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think Mountcastle is the foremost person hurt by Walltimore. I honestly think we need to reconsider what type of right handed batters we throw out there. More Luis Arraez or someone with high OBP. I could see Mountcastle having a revival somewhere else. But not sure it’s really working here anymore, even though he was solid last year. 
    • Who is the real MOO bat though?  I can't think of one other than Soto available.  I am all in on Soto, but I don't think the Orioles will even sniff him.  Absent Soto, who do you look to acquire? I agree that it is time to move on from Tony and Mounty, but I do think you are a little harsh on Tony.  He has won a number of games for this team in the clutch.  He is just prone to cold spells.  
    • OK, there won't be 30 making actual bids but Burnes is free to sign with any team at the highest price. There is one very big reason he won't sign with us, which is money. We do have payroll flexibility but that evaporates if we put $40m/year in one player. I would love this if it happens but my expectations are very low. Even if we are "one of the favorites", say the final four, we only have a 25% chance. Probably lower if any of the others are in larger markets. So I have to agree with Roch's assessment. 
    • In that case the question could be do we pay Mountcastle 6-7M or do we pay a AAAA guy league minimum and use his money on RP. The purpose of keeping Mountcastle was the hope he would eventually break out and have a career year. He’s regressing offensively and the odds of that breakout are shrinking. 
    • With his season now over, curious what happened to the version of Cowser we drafted. looking at his scouting report coming out of Sam Houston State, the concern with him was would his power translate to MLB while his plate discipline and ability to draw walks being a plus. Certainly were concerns about the strikeouts but nowhere near the concerns of someone like Honeycutt.    He finishes the year with 52 walks and 172 strikeouts, with a 30% K rate. He was near the top of the league in strikeouts for most of the year.  is this purely his issues with off speed pitches? Can this be improved or do we accept the awful strikeouts and laud the plus defense.
    • I want to also address the Harper point. I'm talking about RISP, not "late and close". We can talk about high leverage/late and close in a diff convo, but strictly RISP: Bryce Harper 2023: 272/.803 2024: 331/ 1.122 2023 was a goofy year for Harper coming off of Tommy John. He looked good in April, but was a disaster in May/June before finishing the season on fire that year. I don't think he's a good case study for your example. Besides, I'm not talking singular player performance. I'm talking as a team which is far less susceptible to SSS and "chance". FWIW, I do think luck somewhat plays into this.  But let's look at this as a team. 1,298 AB with RISP for the O's this year. A 251 BA. Last year they hit 287. That's a 36 point difference. Yeah, only 3.6%. But let's look at what 3.6% means with that many AB. That means: 47 extra hits. I don't believe that 47 hits explains "luck" or "chance". Maybe for certain hitters in certain situations. There is an element of BABIP here. In 2024, it was 317. This year? 289. So, if we truly believe 300 is league average, they were a little unlucky this year, and somewhat lucky last year. But we are still talking about a dramatic dropoff. Now, is that because of playing more rookies this year? Because of the injuries? Very possibly. And in a 2 game series that can rear its ugly head. But there was nothing unlucky about yesterday or the day before. They just came up completely empty. Maybe the only unlucky situations were Ramon and Westy rips being caught.
    • I mentioned this once before but if you follow high end D1 softball the game has changed dramatically because the pitching is so dominate.  The theory is, you aren't going to score a bunch of runs by stringing singles together so most top programs only recruit athletes with game changing power or speed.  The speed aspect is important because you can turn a single into a double by stealing so now it only takes 2 hits to score a run instead of 3.   The O's lower minors seem to be stacked with guys that can steal bases so maybe that will be the change in philosophy moving forward.   It is just a thought but maybe the organization see's the pitching trend that is dominating because of the bullpen usage and OBP and runs scored across the board are down.  So stack your team with power and or speed and not much else matters.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...