Jump to content

Offseason Waiver Wire Thread


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

We’re going to have the #1 waiver wire spot all offseason. So here’s a good place to talk about any and all players that are available to be claimed. 
 

So far this offseason we’ve claimed RP Bryan Baker from the Jays and IF Lucious Fox from the Royals. 
 

Clint Frazier is out there in DFA land. Due $2.7mm in arbitration next year. He has 3 years of control left. There’s an argument to be made that we could claim him at 26 and upside, then non tender or trade Mancini. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We’re going to have the #1 waiver wire spot all offseason. So here’s a good place to talk about any and all players that are available to be claimed. 
 

So far this offseason we’ve claimed RP Bryan Baker from the Jays and IF Lucious Fox from the Royals. 
 

Clint Frazier is out there in DFA land. Due $2.7mm in arbitration next year. He has 3 years of control left. There’s an argument to be made that we could claim him at 26 and upside, then non tender or trade Mancini. 

The question is, why did Frazier fall off the "cliff" with exit velocity, barrel percentage and everything that tracks hitting the ball hard? It's pretty clear he can't hit offspeed pitches, but they didn't throw them more to him, he just stopped hitting the fastball this year. Saying that, with Mountcastle and Mancini, I don't see where he fits and I just don't see them giving away Mancini this offseason. I think he gets at least one more year to see if he can bring value next trading deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

The question is, why did Frazier fall off the "cliff" with exit velocity, barrel percentage and everything that tracks hitting the ball hard? It's pretty clear he can't hit offspeed pitches, but they didn't throw them more to him, he just stopped hitting the fastball this year. Saying that, with Mountcastle and Mancini, I don't see where he fits and I just don't see them giving away Mancini this offseason. I think he gets at least one more year to see if he can bring value next trading deadline.

I don't think he was healthy at any point in the season.

Vertigo, dizziness, blurred vision.  All bad signs particularly from someone who has a history of head trauma.

I wouldn't be shocked if his career is effectively over. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think he was healthy at any point in the season.

Vertigo, dizziness, blurred vision.  All bad signs particularly from someone who has a history of head trauma.

I wouldn't be shocked if his career is effectively over. 

Thanks, didn't know that. Definitely not good signs for the young man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian Roberts never really regained plus player status once his problems began.

I think I still feel like $2M here could be a better gamble than Tillman's $3M way back when...2020 Frazier looked like a real Age 25 step forward, at his 160 PA cherrypick level he was about 85th percentile wOBA, and 98th percentile in Chase Rate.  

Of course I am peculiar enough of a fan I also won't be that upset if Trey gets an opportunity to pick his team for his Age 30 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

I just read the MLB trade rumors article about the Yankees’ DFAs.

I was thinking we might be interested in Tyler Wade, but no, and Frasier is a disaster. They paid him for an arbitration raise of 2 1/2 million dollars. So also no. No, Steve Carell screaming no.

I was hoping we would claim Tyler Wade (love his speed), but the Yanks traded him to the Angels for Kean Wong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

I was hoping we would claim Tyler Wade (love his speed), but the Yanks traded him to the Angels for Kean Wong.

I was interested in him too, depending on his defense, but I couldn’t find anything about his defense so I figured no.

I’m checking on every single player gets Designated, because we’ve got first crack at all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Brian Roberts never really regained plus player status once his problems began.

I think I still feel like $2M here could be a better gamble than Tillman's $3M way back when...2020 Frazier looked like a real Age 25 step forward, at his 160 PA cherrypick level he was about 85th percentile wOBA, and 98th percentile in Chase Rate.  

Of course I am peculiar enough of a fan I also won't be that upset if Trey gets an opportunity to pick his team for his Age 30 season.

Tillman $3 million was 100% wasted, I will never know why buck- or Dan-insisted on giving him a guaranteed contract when they knew he wasn’t healthy, and then kept hiding him from the press while insisting that everything was splendid, And refused to have any sort of contingency plan. That whole situation was a complete fiasco.

I think other examples would be more effective for bolstering your point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Philip said:

Tillman $3 million was 100% wasted, I will never know why buck- or Dan-insisted on giving him a guaranteed contract when they knew he wasn’t healthy, and then kept hiding him from the press while insisting that everything was splendid, And refused to have any sort of contingency plan. That whole situation was a complete fiasco.

I think other examples would be more effective for bolstering your point

I picked the wasted Tillman comparison because I suspect Can of Corn's take is on base, but even if it is 50-85% likely Frazier is finished as an effective player, investing ~1 year/$2.25M on the chance he isn't is a risk the 2022 Orioles can take more easily than almost all 29 of the other Clubs.    The money is nothing to any of the teams; its just the choice to invest time, care and game repetitions in someone who may or may not work out.

Our top tier farm is mostly off the 40-man roster, but clubs that have been investing in all avenues a long time like the Dodgers, Rays and Yankees enjoy better ~41st guys than we have.    Not having Clint Frazier money feels kind of like not having Gary Thorne money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Just Regular said:

I picked the wasted Tillman comparison because I suspect Can of Corn's take is on base, but even if it is 50-85% likely Frazier is finished as an effective player, investing ~1 year/$2.25M on the chance he isn't is a risk the 2022 Orioles can take more easily than almost all 29 of the other Clubs.    The money is nothing to any of the teams; its just the choice to invest time, care and game repetitions in someone who may or may not work out.

Our top tier farm is mostly off the 40-man roster, but clubs that have been investing in all avenues a long time like the Dodgers, Rays and Yankees enjoy better ~41st guys than we have.    Not having Clint Frazier money feels kind of like not having Gary Thorne money.

We have the money, or the Orioles management has the money, to be more accurate, I just think it’s a waste of money, and as Tony has pointed out we don’t really have a need or place for him. 
I checked all the designations, and my first thought is, “why didn’t Mike want this guy?” And then I look the guy up and I say, “oh.”

There’s some free agent signings I think we should’ve been involved in, like Jhoulys Chacin, for instance.

But I’m pretty confident we’re going to get the best of the dumpster guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

3B Sheldon Neuse was DFAd by the LAD. 
 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/n/neusesh01.shtml?utm_campaign=Linker&utm_source=direct&utm_medium=linker-

40 man upgrade over Bannon?  He’s put up good numbers in AAA, but in the PCL though. He’s been a K machine in the MLB. 
 

It might be re-arranging deck chairs, but I’d be shocked if Bannon is claimed, and we’d get an Option B for 3B other than Guiterrez. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

3B Sheldon Neuse was DFAd by the LAD. 
 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/n/neusesh01.shtml?utm_campaign=Linker&utm_source=direct&utm_medium=linker-

40 man upgrade over Bannon?  He’s put up good numbers in AAA, but in the PCL though. He’s been a K machine in the MLB. 
 

It might be re-arranging deck chairs, but I’d be shocked if Bannon is claimed, and we’d get an Option B for 3B other than Guiterrez. 

Are 40 man moves still do-able during the lockout?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Freddie Freeman ripples in pond as Dodgers designated Matt Beaty for assignment.

Seems like he would simply be better than DJ Stewart, and competitive $$$/WAR with Trey Mancini.   Dodgers probably will be asking Clubs for something while he is in DFA limbo.

Last year among MLB hitters with 200 PA, he was 177th of 362 in Chase Rate, almost exactly 50th percentile - right next to Pedro Severino.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I think Mountcastle is the foremost person hurt by Walltimore. I honestly think we need to reconsider what type of right handed batters we throw out there. More Luis Arraez or someone with high OBP. I could see Mountcastle having a revival somewhere else. But not sure it’s really working here anymore, even though he was solid last year. 
    • Who is the real MOO bat though?  I can't think of one other than Soto available.  I am all in on Soto, but I don't think the Orioles will even sniff him.  Absent Soto, who do you look to acquire? I agree that it is time to move on from Tony and Mounty, but I do think you are a little harsh on Tony.  He has won a number of games for this team in the clutch.  He is just prone to cold spells.  
    • OK, there won't be 30 making actual bids but Burnes is free to sign with any team at the highest price. There is one very big reason he won't sign with us, which is money. We do have payroll flexibility but that evaporates if we put $40m/year in one player. I would love this if it happens but my expectations are very low. Even if we are "one of the favorites", say the final four, we only have a 25% chance. Probably lower if any of the others are in larger markets. So I have to agree with Roch's assessment. 
    • In that case the question could be do we pay Mountcastle 6-7M or do we pay a AAAA guy league minimum and use his money on RP. The purpose of keeping Mountcastle was the hope he would eventually break out and have a career year. He’s regressing offensively and the odds of that breakout are shrinking. 
    • With his season now over, curious what happened to the version of Cowser we drafted. looking at his scouting report coming out of Sam Houston State, the concern with him was would his power translate to MLB while his plate discipline and ability to draw walks being a plus. Certainly were concerns about the strikeouts but nowhere near the concerns of someone like Honeycutt.    He finishes the year with 52 walks and 172 strikeouts, with a 30% K rate. He was near the top of the league in strikeouts for most of the year.  is this purely his issues with off speed pitches? Can this be improved or do we accept the awful strikeouts and laud the plus defense.
    • I want to also address the Harper point. I'm talking about RISP, not "late and close". We can talk about high leverage/late and close in a diff convo, but strictly RISP: Bryce Harper 2023: 272/.803 2024: 331/ 1.122 2023 was a goofy year for Harper coming off of Tommy John. He looked good in April, but was a disaster in May/June before finishing the season on fire that year. I don't think he's a good case study for your example. Besides, I'm not talking singular player performance. I'm talking as a team which is far less susceptible to SSS and "chance". FWIW, I do think luck somewhat plays into this.  But let's look at this as a team. 1,298 AB with RISP for the O's this year. A 251 BA. Last year they hit 287. That's a 36 point difference. Yeah, only 3.6%. But let's look at what 3.6% means with that many AB. That means: 47 extra hits. I don't believe that 47 hits explains "luck" or "chance". Maybe for certain hitters in certain situations. There is an element of BABIP here. In 2024, it was 317. This year? 289. So, if we truly believe 300 is league average, they were a little unlucky this year, and somewhat lucky last year. But we are still talking about a dramatic dropoff. Now, is that because of playing more rookies this year? Because of the injuries? Very possibly. And in a 2 game series that can rear its ugly head. But there was nothing unlucky about yesterday or the day before. They just came up completely empty. Maybe the only unlucky situations were Ramon and Westy rips being caught.
    • I mentioned this once before but if you follow high end D1 softball the game has changed dramatically because the pitching is so dominate.  The theory is, you aren't going to score a bunch of runs by stringing singles together so most top programs only recruit athletes with game changing power or speed.  The speed aspect is important because you can turn a single into a double by stealing so now it only takes 2 hits to score a run instead of 3.   The O's lower minors seem to be stacked with guys that can steal bases so maybe that will be the change in philosophy moving forward.   It is just a thought but maybe the organization see's the pitching trend that is dominating because of the bullpen usage and OBP and runs scored across the board are down.  So stack your team with power and or speed and not much else matters.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...