Jump to content

Jordan Lyles 2023?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

I would do this as well and then sign someone better as a FA too. My reason is Means isn't likely to be up to ML before ASB or so, so Lyles for half year, trade for whatever at deadline, replaced by Means in second half

Or just as likely, a couple guys will be on the IL by the time Means is back. Lyles is a serviceable back of the rotation option. Perhaps Hall is still struggling with command. If he ultimately doesn't pan out as a starter or someone else (Bradish for instance) falters, having extra starters is great. We got lucky this year to have guys like Watkins, Kremer, Voth, etc perform solidly in the rotation. We're not likely to pick up a 30-year old with a career 5.70 ERA off waivers and have him pitch to a 3.19 ERA again next year. Nor are we likely to out of desperation plug in a 29 year old who was coming off a 8.07 ERA in a 54.2 inning rookie campaign the year before and have him throw 15 starts with a ERA+ of 100. 

I agree that we should bring back Lyles (or another veteran arm like him) in addition to a TOR starter. The Orioles have used 10 starters this year and 31 pitchers (if you include the likes of Chris Owings in mop up relief) this year. We need way more than 5 starters and someone "reliable" like Lyles would be nice to have as one of those 10 getting some starts in a season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Lyles finishes strong, he might get a 2 or 3 year deal from someone else. I can't see Elias matching that at all.

Next year we will go into ST with GrayRod, Bradish, Kremer, Watkins, Hall, Wells, Zimmerman, Voth, Vallimont, and maybe even Alexander Wells competing for the Rotation depending on who gets DFA'd between now and the end of the offseason.  Means will be back mid season too, but I would go after one pitcher, probably through a trade over FA, and then let the others fight it out for the final 4.  My guess is GrayRod, Wells, Bradish, and Kremer to go along with whoever they acquire. I think Hall goes to the Bullpen, hopefully in a Hader or Andrew Miller type role.  When Means comes back, he can replace the weakest link in the rotation, or if there isn't a weak link, we can look to trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were sure we could sign two starters who were substantially better than Lyles to reasonable contracts, I’d decline the Lyles option.  Problem is, we have to fish or cut bait on the option before we know who else we will be able to sign.  So that leaves me on the fence about what to do.  Honestly I’d like to see how Lyles finishes the year and study the available FA pitchers a bit more before answering the question.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, jamalshw said:

Or just as likely, a couple guys will be on the IL by the time Means is back. Lyles is a serviceable back of the rotation option. Perhaps Hall is still struggling with command. If he ultimately doesn't pan out as a starter or someone else (Bradish for instance) falters, having extra starters is great. We got lucky this year to have guys like Watkins, Kremer, Voth, etc perform solidly in the rotation. We're not likely to pick up a 30-year old with a career 5.70 ERA off waivers and have him pitch to a 3.19 ERA again next year. Nor are we likely to out of desperation plug in a 29 year old who was coming off a 8.07 ERA in a 54.2 inning rookie campaign the year before and have him throw 15 starts with a ERA+ of 100. 

I agree that we should bring back Lyles (or another veteran arm like him) in addition to a TOR starter. The Orioles have used 10 starters this year and 31 pitchers (if you include the likes of Chris Owings in mop up relief) this year. We need way more than 5 starters and someone "reliable" like Lyles would be nice to have as one of those 10 getting some starts in a season. 

I think you are missing the point on Voth and Watkins.  The O's analytics identified Voth based on his stuff not his record.  And Holt coached him on using his plus pitches and not his below average ones.

Holt taught Watkins two pitches over the last two seasons to make him a different pitcher than what he was before the O's got him.    

Elias trades reliever Lopez for starter Povich based on the analytics.   It looks like the O's uses analytics to find pitchers that other teams don't value as much but that Holt can coach into valuable parts of the pitching staff.  And yes, I think they will continue to do this in the future.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ScGO's said:

If Lyles finishes strong, he might get a 2 or 3 year deal from someone else. I can't see Elias matching that at all.

Next year we will go into ST with GrayRod, Bradish, Kremer, Watkins, Hall, Wells, Zimmerman, Voth, Vallimont, and maybe even Alexander Wells competing for the Rotation depending on who gets DFA'd between now and the end of the offseason.  Means will be back mid season too, but I would go after one pitcher, probably through a trade over FA, and then let the others fight it out for the final 4.  My guess is GrayRod, Wells, Bradish, and Kremer to go along with whoever they acquire. I think Hall goes to the Bullpen, hopefully in a Hader or Andrew Miller type role.  When Means comes back, he can replace the weakest link in the rotation, or if there isn't a weak link, we can look to trade.

I think Zimmermann and Vallimont are DFA'd after the season.  They could pass through waivers and stay in the system.  Alex Wells will depend on what he does the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Frobby said:

If I were sure we could sign two starters who were substantially better than Lyles to reasonable contracts, I’d decline the Lyles option.  Problem is, we have to fish or cut bait on the option before we know who else we will be able to sign.  So that leaves me on the fence about what to do.  Honestly I’d like to see how Lyles finishes the year and study the available FA pitchers a bit more before answering the question.   

Do you think teams will be clamoring to sign Lyles this offseason?

You take the “risk” of letting the mediocre pitcher go and then come back to him if needs be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Do you think teams will be clamoring to sign Lyles this offseason?

You take the “risk” of letting the mediocre pitcher go and then come back to him if needs be.

Clamoring?  No.  But he might have done enough to get a 2-year contract somewhere and I don’t think we want him for more than one in any event.  As I said, I need to study the FA pitcher market a bit more.  But I probably won’t do that until the season ends, in the days before the team has to make it’s decision on Lyles.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Frobby said:

As I said, I need to study the FA pitcher market a bit more.

This is where I stand too.

I think one thing most of us agree on is our position players are pretty much set for next year. You can always argue we could trade for an upgrade here or there, but it isn't a necessity at this point.

That means that most of the focus of the offseason needs to be on improving our starting pitching. Doing so should further strengthen our bullpen. Where does Lyles fit? I have no idea. Is there value in a guy who can give innings like Lyles does as the #4/5 starter, yes. Is it worth the money? That depends on what else we do.

So the Lyles discussion has to happen in the context of other things. That's just not a discussion that I have enough information on yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

This is where I stand too.

I think one thing most of us agree on is our position players are pretty much set for next year. You can always argue we could trade for an upgrade here or there, but it isn't a necessity at this point.

That means that most of the focus of the offseason needs to be on improving our starting pitching. Doing so should further strengthen our bullpen. Where does Lyles fit? I have no idea. Is there value in a guy who can give innings like Lyles does as the #4/5 starter, yes. Is it worth the money? That depends on what else we do.

So the Lyles discussion has to happen in the context of other things. That's just not a discussion that I have enough information on yet.

You need to strengthen the pen too.  
 

Now, that may come in the form of guys like Kremer and Bradish going to the pen but it needs to be better(better relative to realistic 2023 predictions based off of current stats) and have some different arms out there. 

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

You need to strengthen the pen too.  
 

Now, that may come in the form of guys like Kremer and Bradish going to the pen but it needs to be better(better relative to realistic 2023 predictions based off of current stats) and have some different arms out there. 

Yeah, I expect the pen to be strengthened from our own guys. The biggest team need is starters.

As you and others have pointed out, if we can get even one upgrade, and we get to add Rodriguez, the entire staff gets so much better. Get two legit upgrades plus Rodriguez, hoping on Hall and waiting on Means, and you're onto something.

Payroll flexibility is there. Depth of prospects/ML players for trades is there. Just do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lyles has been integral to this teams success this year.  His innings and ability to stay healthy have allowed the bullpen to stay reasonably well-rested. He has gone 5+ innings in 19 of his 23 starts.  In 2 of the others, he went 4+ innings.  One time he didn't get out of the 3rd inning.  There is value for a bullpen to this consistency.  Guys getting blown-up in the first can really kill a bullpen.  If he goes, the Orioles need a similar style guy (innings and health) next year.  It's clear that Sig has a way to value this in his model and they prioritized signing Lyles early. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lyles got 2 years from Texas off his good part year in Milwaukee, but he's older now.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2019/12/rangers-to-sign-jordan-lyles.html

I believe the flattery option was 98% to hold Lyles' take home from $7mm to $6mm on the off chance he pitched somewhere between his 70th percentile and 95th percentile and could be of use to someone in a Scott Feldman type role.

I doubt we will get 2 SP better than him, and believe Elias will try and finesse that tasteful 1-2 of declining the option but telling the player, "Hey, we're still interested - you're just more like a 7 than a 10".     Maybe don't say the last part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Do you think teams will be clamoring to sign Lyles this offseason?

You take the “risk” of letting the mediocre pitcher go and then come back to him if needs be.

I think Lyles will get more than $10M guaranteed if the Orioles decline his option. Probably not $10M a year, but 2/$16M seems about right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MurphDogg said:

I think Lyles will get more than $10M guaranteed if the Orioles decline his option. Probably not $10M a year, but 2/$16M seems about right.

Maybe.  That will be partially determined but how he ends the year.  Lyles has been a product of the wall in many ways.  I’m sure teams will take that into account.

Now, with that said, eating innings and taking the ball every 5th day is important.  Whether or not those are good innings remains to be seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Highly doubt Bradish gets skipped. He’s already getting an extra day off with the 6 man rotation.
    • They likely want to keep their momentum going.  I don't think they over think things to line up in NY with their top 3.  But we will see.
    • I was there last night.  He threw a curveball warming up that looked really good and I knew the game was over.  His velo was never my concern until that curve stops working and then he's fastball only and gets in trouble.
    • I agree that his bat has been up and down but it would be hard to classify his season to date as anything other than tremendous. His defense has been so good that’s he’s been worth 2.1 WAR in 216 PA’s. Last year, Gunnar was worth 4.7 WAR in 622 PA’s. Pro rate Cowser’s season so far to 622 PA’s and that comes out to 6 WAR. That’s not saying he will keep up this pace the whole year, but if he hits close to league average and keeps up his defense, he will likely be a 4 WAR player. I don’t think anyone expected that coming into the season.
    • 34 AB - not a small sample size when OPS is over 1.000, including some dinky 2B’s. He will be up soon and be one of the best players on the team. 34 AB when not producing, SSS and nothing can be taken from it.
    • With the off day coming up, we can skip two guys. Right now we are down a lefty in the pen in NYY is RHB heavy (aside from Soto). I think Irvin in the pen makes sense to get an extra lefty.  Then, as I posted in another thread, if we skip Bradish vs Philly, we would then get Bradish-Grayson-Burnes vs NYY.   
    • Love this post, Frobby. I'm half your age and I totally understand where you're coming from. Especially the second paragraph. We won 103 games last season with the lowest payroll in baseball. We are on an even better pace for next season and given the reasonably expected trajectories of our talent in the organization things look only likely to get better and better. In a sports world where financial capability, especially in a non salary cap system, has an extremely strong correlation to success, that is just absolutely brilliant. Sometimes I wonder if people have taken the time to really step back and appreciate what an achievement it is to not only be in the shape that this organization is, but simply the mere fact of going 148-81 in our last season and almost a half, with the lowest payroll in baseball. It certainly deserves the kind of esteem and deference to the club's decision making enough to avoid some of the things you talk about in the first paragraph, IMO. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...