Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

I pretty much agree with Sports Guy......just not the idiotic part.   LOL.   If you can just remember how rough Markakis and Ripken had their first year you would understand why we need to have patience.  Gunnar is honestly probably going to be as good as Markakis.  All the respected national independent scouting orgs believe in him.   He needs a very very long leash.  

I think he has the potential to be better for the Orioles than Markakis was. Gunnar is certainly a more hyped prospect. I think the interesting part is that the team is in a very different place and there are so many potential replacements. That said I really don’t think the Orioles will demote Gunnar anytime soon unless he looks very lost. And by anytime soon I’m talking well into late June (even though I said the end of this month in a previous post, they are not doing that). But to be honest he does not look like the polished prospect that I expected to see this season. He looks like an immensely talented player with a great eye, but I have been surprised by the erratic defense and his inability to pull the trigger at the plate. I think Markakis’ defense was strong from the get go and certainly Machado’s defense was spectacular immediately after promotion. 
 

SportsGuy is frequently rude and maybe even frequently wrong, but I actually agree with him on Gunnar a lot more than my post probably made it sound. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow.  There are threads that leave the rails and then there are threads that leave the rails and cannonball straight into another dimension.

I'll go out on a limb here and say that two-three months from now, we'll have some other actual dilemma like starting pitching to agonize over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dibbs31 said:

Gunnar is one of our better prospects in decades. His development is more important than hoping this 2023 team wins the world series. 

I agree that Gunnar deserves a very long leash, but I don't think you're going to get much mileage out of this take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dibbs31 said:

Gunnar is one of our better prospects in decades. His development is more important than hoping this 2023 team wins the world series. 

Honestly if Gunnar doesnt become a mega star the Orioles had no chance to win it anyway.  Figuring out what we have with him is probably the top objective of the whole season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 24fps said:

I agree that Gunnar deserves a very long leash, but I don't think you're going to get much mileage out of this take.

What are our realistic chances at a World Series this year? And who is a major upgrade over Gunnar right now to make that happen? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

Honestly if Gunnar doesnt become a mega star the Orioles had no chance to win it anyway.  Figuring out what we have with him is probably the top objective of the whole season.  

Exactly. The Orioles chances of being elite hinge a lot on Gunnar being elite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

Honestly if Gunnar doesnt become a mega star the Orioles had no chance to win it anyway.  Figuring out what we have with him is probably the top objective of the whole season.  

I don’t agree. For example, the organization could more easily replace Gunnar than Grayson IMO. If one major prospect busting is going to sink the Orioles, then there’s no hope. Some are going to fail, get hurt, etc. it’s a given. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

Honestly if Gunnar doesnt become a mega star the Orioles had no chance to win it anyway.  Figuring out what we have with him is probably the top objective of the whole season.  

Kind of like when we had our best season in recent memory while mega-star, Manny Machado, missed half the year and we were carried offensively by Steve Pearce?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DirtyBird said:

No it doesn’t 

Lol ok. A high OBP absolute stud of a prospect means little in the O's being good. We obviously arent signing big FA's. Gunnar is a huge part of the Orioles being successful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dibbs31 said:

What are our realistic chances at a World Series this year? And who is a major upgrade over Gunnar right now to make that happen? 

Chances are no longer relevant.  2022 says the O's now play to win.  No more tanking regardless of what internet experts think about roster construction, odds, strategy, blah, blah, blah.  And about damn time if you ask me.

Gunnar Henderson is not the problem, at the moment his development is a minor annoyance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DirtyBird said:

Kind of like when we had our best season in recent memory while mega-star, Manny Machado, missed half the year and we were carried offensively by Steve Pearce?

Yea that worked out well. What have the Orioles done since the 1990s?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dibbs31 said:

Lol ok. A high OBP absolute stud of a prospect means little in the O's being good. We obviously arent signing big FA's. Gunnar is a huge part of the Orioles being successful. 

Absolute studs don’t bat under .200 w/ their greatest value being when they don’t swing the bat.

Edited by DirtyBird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • See, you just can't help yourself.  You gotta get personal haha.  Never fails.  I see that a lot on internet message boards and to me it is always a sign of weakness and/or they have no argument.    Be better. 
    • ESPN (Kiley McDaniel) provides notes and re-rank of his top50.  Note that he removes players who have already lost or projected to lose eligibility in next week or so (meaning no guys like Cowser on O’s or Langford on TEX).  Link to post (note is behind paywall). Holliday #2 and 65 FV tier (along w/Skenes who jumped to #1 overall) Mayo #6 and 60 FV tier Basallo #16 and 55 FV tier Kjerstad #47 and 50 FV tier Fangraphs (Eric Longenhagen) provides update to his top100.  Unlike Kiley/ESPN, this list does not yet reflect any changes or projected changes to rookie eligibility (ie guys like Langford and Chourio are still in the top100 list).  Link to top100 list and his separate write up post. Holliday #1 Basallo #9 Mayo #22 Kjerstad #26 Povich #92
    • Exactly, your point about his upside is one of reasons I advocate him to play CF . And yes our personnel has an opening at CF . Jackson is 20 now and still at AAA . What better time to start crash course on CF than now ?
    • I don't disagree but they've been extraordinarily fortunate w/ their contact. Feels a little like the 2014 Royals series..... everything's a hit.
    • This is crazy to me.  Holliday has shown 29 fps sprint speed in a very short stint up, which is plus-plus speed.  Sprint speed doesn't even peak until like 23 or 24, so he might go even higher.  Sprint speed is one of the universal hallmarks of raw athleticism and a Holliday is really fast.   The argument for athleticism applies doe people like Juan Soto, who is a once-in-a-generation hitter but appears to be pretty mediocre as an athlete by MLB standards.  There's no way Holliday fits that description.   And if athleticism benchmarks are too specialized, just look at his defense.  He's rated at +2 at 2b in only 2 weeks by OAA, and he hasn't even looked his best.  A mediocre athlete wouldn't be able to handle the dynamic movements of a MI position the way Holliday has.
    • Glad to see Kjerstad getting another start tonight.
    • My first 2 choices to trade would be Holliday and Heston of the guys who really haven't played on the Os much yet.  I think you could get almost whatever you want for Holliday (big time starter) and add in a couple of pieces with Heston and get 2 really good relievers.    And before you ask me who?  We have all seen the names on here but guys on other teams are really not by forte.  I will leave that to the experts.  Anyway..... Bingo, your pitching staff is much better.  You can win a WS this year and have pitching for next year.  All without hurting the team this year and maybe not even next. BTW in this scenario I resign Santa in place of Heston.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...