Jump to content

Cowser Vs Kjerstad


Sports Guy

Who would you keep?  

68 members have voted

  1. 1. If you had your choice, which player would you prefer to keep?



Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

I think maybe there's some redundancy with Kjerstad & Mayo... and between the two, I'd obviously prefer Mayo. 

So I went with Cowser. Obviously a lot of it depends on who's comin' back 🤨

You can never have enough elite middle of the order hitters (what both of them are projecting/profiling towards).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been a big fan of Kjerstad since we drafted him. I think he's the massive lefty bat we've been missing since Prime CD. If it really came down to keeping one or the other - meaning another organization thought of them both exactly equally - I think it's an easy decision to keep Kjerstad. I just have a hard time thinking that either one will be a centerpiece in a controllable SP trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

You can never have enough elite middle of the order hitters (what both of them are projecting/profiling towards).

Well, yeah... I'd prefer to keep them both depending on the return, which was assumed to be "enough" for the purposes of this exercise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sanfran327 said:

I've been a big fan of Kjerstad since we drafted him. I think he's the massive lefty bat we've been missing since Prime CD. If it really came down to keeping one or the other - meaning another organization thought of them both exactly equally - I think it's an easy decision to keep Kjerstad. I just have a hard time thinking that either one will be a centerpiece in a controllable SP trade.

Everybody is touchable for the right price. I mean if the Red Sox offered prime Pedro Martinez for Adley or Holliday you would be a fool to turn that down. Except the Red Sox would never offer that.  I would in fact trade either Kjerstad or Cowser for a controllable TOR Starter. Problem is we aren't getting that with either of those guys as the centerpiece. You would likely have to trade Holliday and another top prospect, if not 2 other top prospects for a controllable TOR starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Kjeratad.  I want to see someone hit the warehouse before I die.   

In the system right now, I think Gunnar has the best chance to do it. Ohtani is the guy who probably has the best chance right now in all of baseball. 

 

When Gunnar grows into his man strength around 25, look out. 

 

Right now I envision Kjerstad having a Justin Morneau-ish career. Had it not been for the mycharditis, he may be the guy currently occupying that platoon of 1B/OF/DH that Ant has for them this year. So far this year he's seen 20 games 1B, 18 at DH and 38 in the outfield. I can see him putting together a string of five or six really strong years as did Morneau but I think ultimately Cowser is the better/more valuable player long-term. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cowser has sucked in the very small sample size since he's come up so I voted for him mainly to neutralize recency bias.  The way I really feel is that if one has to be traded - and only for quality controllable pitching at that - I don't care.  Keep any two of Cowser, Kjerstad and Mayo and trade the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gurgi said:

Yeah but I aint in the mood to try to mentally figure out which first round pick I would rather keep if I had to trade one.  Its a made up situation.  Its pointless.  I would rather keep both.  

And now Cowser has a tiny sample size and people will be screaming to keep Kjerstad.  LOL   Its okay if your bored today and have nothing to think about then this.  Not quite debating imaginary trades but almost. 

I don't understand the need to troll and/or belittle the OP's topic.  I see it all the time and wonder why that is. You literally said, " Its a made up situation.  Its pointless." and " Its okay if your bored today and have nothing to think about then this." 

  1. It's made up, but with purpose, like much of what we talk about here.
  2. Not pointless to everyone that responded.
  3. If you are bored and have nothing else to complain about, try finding something else to do, rather than troll threads.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

If Cowser is up here hitting .360, he's the one that everyone wants to keep.

Should do Cowser vs. Kjerstad vs. Mayo.

I hear you and thought about his SSS performance thus far, and suspect that could sway opinions.  We're only human, after all.  I for one, am ignoring Cowser's performance thus far... or am I? Hmmmm... 😉

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, banks703 said:

In the system right now, I think Gunnar has the best chance to do it. Ohtani is the guy who probably has the best chance right now in all of baseball. 

 

When Gunnar grows into his man strength around 25, look out. 

 

Right now I envision Kjerstad having a Justin Morneau-ish career. Had it not been for the mycharditis, he may be the guy currently occupying that platoon of 1B/OF/DH that Ant has for them this year. So far this year he's seen 20 games 1B, 18 at DH and 38 in the outfield. I can see him putting together a string of five or six really strong years as did Morneau but I think ultimately Cowser is the better/more valuable player long-term. 

You mentioned the word platoon in your post. You are not suggesting that Kjerstad would be a platoon player are you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, banks703 said:

In the system right now, I think Gunnar has the best chance to do it. Ohtani is the guy who probably has the best chance right now in all of baseball. 

 

When Gunnar grows into his man strength around 25, look out. 

 

Right now I envision Kjerstad having a Justin Morneau-ish career. Had it not been for the mycharditis, he may be the guy currently occupying that platoon of 1B/OF/DH that Ant has for them this year. So far this year he's seen 20 games 1B, 18 at DH and 38 in the outfield. I can see him putting together a string of five or six really strong years as did Morneau but I think ultimately Cowser is the better/more valuable player long-term. 

 

If Cowser turns out to be better than Justin freaking Morneau then he's gone after 6 seasons. If he's that good then somebody is paying him 35 million a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, johnrambo said:

Everybody is touchable for the right price. I mean if the Red Sox offered prime Pedro Martinez for Adley or Holliday you would be a fool to turn that down. Except the Red Sox would never offer that.  I would in fact trade either Kjerstad or Cowser for a controllable TOR Starter. Problem is we aren't getting that with either of those guys as the centerpiece. You would likely have to trade Holliday and another top prospect, if not 2 other top prospects for a controllable TOR starter. 

There is NO PLAYER that could command Holliday PLUS Kjerstad. Not even Ohtani. 

Are you serious with the Holliday, plus 2 top prospects? Could you provide insight as far as precedent regarding this type of trade? What specific "controllable TOR" starter(s) could command the type of asking price that you describe? Has that ever happened before?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

There is NO PLAYER that could command Holliday PLUS Kjerstad. Not even Ohtani. 

Are you serious with the Holliday, plus 2 top prospects? Could you provide insight as far as precedent regarding this type of trade? What specific "controllable TOR" starter(s) could command the type of asking price that you describe? Has that ever happened before?

Yea, cuz nobody would be stupid enough to trade a guy like prime Randy Johnson or Pedro Martinez. Holliday with either Cowser/Kjerstad? Yep, making that trade any day and twice on Sunday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

You mentioned the word platoon in your post. You are not suggesting that Kjerstad would be a platoon player are you?

Virtually every player on the roster right now with the exception of Hays has experienced some platooning by rotating between positions in the field and DHing or not playing against certain pitchers (L/R). But that's not necessarily what I meant. I meant that I think if he had not experienced the health issues, I'll speculate that Santander may have been moved and Kjerstad is rotating between OF/1B/DH as Santander has done this year. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...