Jump to content

Second half leaders


Frobby

Recommended Posts

The O’s are 17-9 so far in the second half.  
Mountcastle 1.128 OPS

McCann .966

Frazier .891

Rutschman .865

Bradish 2-2, 2.84 ERA

Rodriguez 0-1, 3.45

Kremer 2-0, 3.71

Gibson 2-0, 4.15

So far, the team has a 3.88 ERA in the second half.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If McCann and Frazier continue to produce in the second half, with a newfound Ryan Mountcastle, a healthy Ced and the rest of the fun bunch, the O's are going to continue to be really tough. Gibby (who I personally targeted as a rotation upgrade candidate before the TWells situation) and the other veteran guys are really coming through for this team right now. It shows once again that Elias and Company know more about their job than a lot of us think that we do. 

They've played really well through a tough part of their schedule. My hope is that they take advantage of this next stretch against teams that, on paper, are weaker than who they've played thus far in the second half. In past years, even the years during the playoff teams in the 'Teens, I was in perpetual fear of them playing down to their competition. I don't think that I have that fear with this current group. They seem to be pretty focused and consistent most every night, which has been huge to their success this year.

They have 48 wins against teams that are > .500, which is 9 games more than any other team. If that doesn't signal their ability to compete with anyone, I don't know what will. That 17-9 is excellent. The Tuesday night game stinks as it would have made them 18-8 in the second half and 4 up on the Rays right now but I'd rather they have a meltdown game/series at the beginning of August than in October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The O’s are 17-9 so far in the second half.  
Mountcastle 1.128 OPS

McCann .966

Frazier .891

Rutschman .865

Bradish 2-2, 2.84 ERA

Rodriguez 0-1, 3.45

Kremer 2-0, 3.71

Gibson 2-0, 4.15

So far, the team has a 3.88 ERA in the second half.

The SP has been great. It’s easy to see that the more McCann plays well, then Adley can produce more as a DH. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The 2 homer game game for Frazier is really propping up his numbers in the second half.

They reduced his at bats, which is good to see. 
 

 

You never miss an opportunity to diss Frazier or minimize anything good he’s done.  They’ve reduced his at bats ever since Westburg arrived, which is fine. We all want Westburg to get regular playing time.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

You never miss an opportunity to diss Frazier or minimize anything good he’s done.  They’ve reduced his at bats ever since Westburg arrived, which is fine. We all want Westburg to get regular playing time.

Frazier is actually performing worse than I predicted but yea, I think when you put numbers out there based off of a SSS and that SSS is literally being propped up largely by one game, it should be stated.

That game increased his OPS by close to 40 points. To his credit, he has basically sustained it but outside of that game he is hitting 266 since the break with 1 homer, 3 doubles and 8 singles.…nothing really jaw dropping and certainly not what the 891 OPS you mentioned would lead you to believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

The 2 homer game game for Frazier is really propping up his numbers in the second half.

They reduced his at bats, which is good to see. 
 

 

Kinda.. though I agree that reducing his playing time is good because his defense is not awesome and it means that both JW and Urias get more and because Frazier looks like someone who does NOT need to play all the time to be productive with his opportunities. Maybe that's what Hyde means when he refers to the Odors and Fraziers and their veteranocity (though Odor was not as productive as Frazier has been this year). If he's playing three or four times a week and maintain his production, he's a really good option off of the bench as he could in a pinch play both SS and 3B as well as the OF, as we've seen.

Going back exactly two months to June 11 (41 games) he's posted:

.257/.315/.451. His BABIP is .250 and wOBA is .329. During that time he logged 126 PA, 29 H, 4 2B, 6 HR, 15 R, 22 RBI. 

This is a pretty steady line for him. The .766 OPS is nothing to write home about but it's better than everyone not named Gunnar, Adley, Ant, O'Hearn and Mountcastle (Westburg's OPS since June 11 is .761, Urias is .722)

Since July 1 though (26 games) Frazier has posted:

.296/.320/.521. His BABIP is .293 and wOBA is .355. During that time he logged 77 PA, 21 H, 4 2B, 4 HR, 10 R, 15 RBI. 

His K for the year is 12% and has been pretty consistent all year (12.7% since June 11 and 13% since July 1).

He's been pretty steady at the plate though for the last two months so I can't agree that his numbers are propped up by the 2HR game. They're better for sure but overall they've been pretty good for a while now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Frazier is actually performing worse than I predicted but yea, I think when you put numbers out there based off of a SSS and that SSS is literally being propped up largely by one game, it should be stated.

That game increased his OPS by close to 40 points. To his credit, he has basically sustained it but outside of that game he is hitting 266 since the break with 1 homer, 3 doubles and 8 singles.…nothing really jaw dropping and certainly not what the 891 OPS you mentioned would lead you to believe.

I mean, all I did was post who the post-ASB leaders were.  It’s not like I had some agenda to prop up Frazier.  I probably could remove the best game of Mountcastle, McCann or Rutschman and their numbers also would drop significantly.   (Not as much for Mountcastle or Rutschman since they have more PA than Frazier or McCann.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I mean, all I did was post who the post-ASB leaders were.  It’s not like I had some agenda to prop up Frazier.  I probably could remove the best game of Mountcastle, McCann or Rutschman and their numbers also would drop significantly.   (Not as much for Mountcastle or Rutschman since they have more PA than Frazier or McCann.)

And all I did is mention that one game props up his stats in the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not take Frazier's bad games out, too?  I mean, yes, he had a two homer game, but guess what, if some others had a game like that, maybe they'd be a leader.

The cherry-picking of stats kind of gets overdone to suit a narrative.  We're better than this.....I think.

Edited by Sanity Check
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Frazier is actually performing worse than I predicted but yea, I think when you put numbers out there based off of a SSS and that SSS is literally being propped up largely by one game, it should be stated.

That game increased his OPS by close to 40 points. To his credit, he has basically sustained it but outside of that game he is hitting 266 since the break with 1 homer, 3 doubles and 8 singles.…nothing really jaw dropping and certainly not what the 891 OPS you mentioned would lead you to believe.

Since the break FanGraphs has Frazier at:

.306/.340/.551. .300 BABIP and .374 wOBA. 

54 PAs, 15 H, 3 2B, 3 HR, 7 R, 10 RBI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And?

LOL

I'm just clarifying your statement of how Frazier has performed worse than what you predicted with the stats that you provided. He's not hitting .266 since the break with one homerun. He's hitting .306 since the break with 3 homeruns. 

That's all, good buddy. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, banks703 said:

If McCann and Frazier continue to produce in the second half, with a newfound Ryan Mountcastle, a healthy Ced and the rest of the fun bunch, the O's are going to continue to be really tough. Gibby (who I personally targeted as a rotation upgrade candidate before the TWells situation) and the other veteran guys are really coming through for this team right now. It shows once again that Elias and Company know more about their job than a lot of us think that we do. 

They've played really well through a tough part of their schedule. My hope is that they take advantage of this next stretch against teams that, on paper, are weaker than who they've played thus far in the second half. In past years, even the years during the playoff teams in the 'Teens, I was in perpetual fear of them playing down to their competition. I don't think that I have that fear with this current group. They seem to be pretty focused and consistent most every night, which has been huge to their success this year.

They have 48 wins against teams that are > .500, which is 9 games more than any other team. If that doesn't signal their ability to compete with anyone, I don't know what will. That 17-9 is excellent. The Tuesday night game stinks as it would have made them 18-8 in the second half and 4 up on the Rays right now but I'd rather they have a meltdown game/series at the beginning of August than in October.

This team oozes with confidence and competitive spirit.  They don't seem to care who they play; they just love to play the game!  Here's to hoping the Astros taking 2 of 3 raises the bar even more!  They have a great mix of stability/maturity/focus and energy/passion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...