Jump to content

Who do you want starting game 3? (Update: Kremer will start)


O's84

Who do you want starting game 3?  

36 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you want starting game 3?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 10/10/23 at 23:00

Recommended Posts

I went with Gibson because of veteranocity.

I've always thought Kremer was a bit of an emotional player.  That's not necessarily a bad thing, but I could see it getting over top of him in this kind of environment.

I kind of feel that was what happened to Rodriguez, who is similar to Kremer as an emotional performer.

The environment in Arlington will be charged.  It's a dome, and blood is in the water.

It's going to be a punch in the face to our guys, who have, mostly, never played a road playoff game.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pickles said:

I went with Gibson because of veteranocity.

I've always thought Kremer was a bit of an emotional player.  That's not necessarily a bad thing, but I could see it getting over top of him in this kind of environment.

I kind of feel that was what happened to Rodriguez, who is similar to Kremer as an emotional performer.

The environment in Arlington will be charged.  It's a dome, and blood is in the water.

It's going to be a punch in the face to our guys, who have, mostly, never played a road playoff game.

Interesting perspective and worth considering. I voted for Kremer because he has better stuff than Gibson and this is a Rangers lineup that absolutely destroys mediocre pitching.

This team is relatively inexperienced and to me it looked like a lot of these players were pressing this weekend. Gibson is less likely to be phased by the crowd in Arlington on Tuesday night and just maybe he can have a Joe Saunders like performance in the 2012 wild card which was also at the Rangers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles had 15 occasions where they lost at least 2 games in a row, including two streaks of 4 games and two streaks of 3 games.   That means there were 15 opportunities to stop a losing streak at 2 games.  11 of the 15 times it was successfully stopped at 2 games, twice it was successfully stopped at 3 games, and 2 times it was successfully stopped at 4 games.  

Dean Kremer pitched 8 times in games where the O’s had lost 2 in a row.  Six times, the streak ended there.   Twice, he failed to stop the streak.   He had by far the most chances to break up a losing streak of any of our pitchers.   

Kyle Bradish pitched 4 times following a 2-game streak, once following a 3 game streak.  He stopped the losing streak 3 times and it continued twice.  Two of the 3 times he broke a losing streak, it was against Texas (though one was the game where he was pulled in the 2nd inning after getting hit in the foot).

Grayson Rodriguez halted all 3 losing streaks he faced, including stopping a 4-gamer during the Tampa series.

Kyle Gibson halted one 2-game losing streak and failed to halt another.  

Cole irvin halted a 4-game losing streak and John Means halted a 3-game streak.  

Jack Flaherty failed to stop a 3-game losing streak in his one streakbuster opportunity.

Though Kremer stopped the losing streak 6 of 8 times he had the chance, I wouldn’t say he pitched great in most of them.  In the 6 successful outings he threw 36.1 innings and allowed 17 ER (4.21 ERA).  In the two unsuccessful ones, he lasted only 6.1 innings and allowed 10 ER.   So together, in his 8 chances he threw 42.2 innings and allowed 27 ER, for a 5.69 ERA.

Gibson pitched well in both his stopper opportunities.  In his successful one, he pitched 6.1 innings and allowed 1 run.  In his unsuccessful one, he threw 6 innings and allowed 2 runs, but the O’s were shut out.  
 

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at our game logs to see how many two-game skids we had this year, and I thought about doing a little write-up. Then I thought to myself, Frobby’s probably already doing this, and his write-up will be infinitely better than whatever I might post. Great information. It’s a tough call for me, Kremer vs. Gibson in Game 3. I think I lean Gibson based on these stats. I think that’s how Hyde will play it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a believer that the veteran in this particular situation should get the nod in game 3. 

I think people have to also remember that Kyle Gipson's FIP was 4.13 compared to Kremer's 4.51. Gibson has never started a playoff game, but has been in 3 games, pitching well in 2 out of 3 relief appearances. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...