Jump to content

Craig Kimbrel - Signing


E-D-D-I-E

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

I'm not cherry picking anything, I'm looking at all of the data. You're the one excluding a bad outing here and a bad outing there just to fit your narrative. And if you're going to insert yourself in my conversation maybe I should dig up all those posts where you condescendingly lectured me on how I was "completely" overvaluing Woo and Miller. Still feel the same after the potential Parades for Woo/Miller trade that was leaked? Can't wait to read the three paragraphs you write explaining how you were weren't wrong and how you don't give "two sh*ts". [insert Michael Jackson eating popcorn GIF].

 

Well, considering you don’t understand reading comprehension, you can do what you want but I never once said that those guys could get Woo or Miller.  What I did say and what my point was that they may not need a top prospect and likely would be focusing on right now help, which is my preference to deal..which is of course correct.  I wished we could get one of them for those guys but I never said the Mariners would do it.  In fact, the deal that I have said a lot for Woo is a straight up Woo/Cowser deal and that is in a situation where Cowser is the higher rated guy.  

Also, there is nothing that says that was the deal. We have no idea what else Seattle would be sending for Paredes. After all, if both sides were happy with a 1 for 1, the deal would likely be done…assuming that trade is even true. It was one account who said it and it’s not exactly someone who is nationally known. 
 

Ad for the cherry picking, again, you just don’t understand. All anyone is saying that if you are going to be stuck in the 80s and not interested in actually looking at real stats and want to hang onto ERA, his ERA gets skewed by a few bad outings.  But if you actually pay attention to numbers that matter, your issues are unfounded, illogical and (wait for it) factually wrong.  
 

So yea, you are the one cherry picking. Your actual reasoning doesn’t have much validity behind it. You bring up that he lost his job…yep he did..largely on the back of 2 awful outings and then he was very good after that.

No one had said that those 2 appearances shouldn’t count…just that it’s not a total representation of the season he had and hanging onto that is absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's think about it this way. 

When the Orioles were in need of a late-inning reliever last year at the deadline, how would we have felt about acquiring Kimbrel instead of Fuji? Take the cost of the trade out of it, just think about adding Kimbrel to the bullpen instead of Fuji.

There's no way that wouldn't have been a large improvement over what we got out of Fuji. 

And that's basically what we're doing now is replacing Fuji with Kimbrel. That feels like a solid upgrade. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

Let's think about it this way. 

When the Orioles were in need of a late-inning reliever last year at the deadline, how would we have felt about acquiring Kimbrel instead of Fuji? Take the cost of the trade out of it, just think about adding Kimbrel to the bullpen instead of Fuji.

There's no way that wouldn't have been a large improvement over what we got out of Fuji. 

And that's basically what we're doing now is replacing Fuji with Kimbrel. That feels like a solid upgrade. 

Well, we are replacing Bautista with Kimbrel.

The Fuji replacement is more in the line of Tate, Wells or Hall.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Goober Noodles said:

I'm fairly certain the proper term is "bird of war" stance...  or maybe it's "war bird"?

k62r1Kp.jpg

 

I'll be honest, I could care less if it has a name or not. It's dumb looking, but if it makes him feel better, then whatever. 

It's still better than the disgusting Licopotamus! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

See I disagree with this. I find Elias to be pretty forthcoming. What he says he wants to do, he generally does.

 

Yes, there is always some level of GM Speak but when talking about what he wants to do for the team, he has pretty much always come through.

SG, we disagree on something!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The guy blew 5 saves, against 23 saves and 7 holds.  Thats okay, not spectacular.  He allowed runs in 17 of 71 outings.  Decent, not spectacular.  I expect him to be adequate for his purpose.   Nobody’s expecting him to set the world on fire.  

Maybe our staff/analytics department can tease out a slightly better performance.  If not, and he saves at a rate like he did last year, he still takes away some of the sting of losing Bautista.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Maybe our staff/analytics department can tease out a slightly better performance.  If not, and he saves at a rate like he did last year, he still takes away some of the sting of losing Bautista.

 

You hope the offense ticks up, the starting rotation ticks up, and some guys step up in the bullpen. I think Felix helped us win more games than we prooobbbbbably should have? So I'm just hoping everything improves a little and makes up for his absence. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The guy blew 5 saves, against 23 saves and 7 holds.  Thats okay, not spectacular.  He allowed runs in 17 of 71 outings.  Decent, not spectacular.  I expect him to be adequate for his purpose.   Nobody’s expecting him to set the world on fire.  

Exactly. There are very few "sure things" at the end of of bullpens and even those guys have bad outings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, interloper said:

You hope the offense ticks up, the starting rotation ticks up, and some guys step up in the bullpen. I think Felix helped us win more games than we prooobbbbbably should have? So I'm just hoping everything improves a little and makes up for his absence. 

Teams wouldn't sac bunt against Bautista in extra innings because he was striking everyone out.  That's big.  

I like Kimbrel.  I hope we get this wrapped up soon.  He's the first big domino we need.  Elias can then pivot to the trade market for a reliever or two that has as at least one option.  You need two flexible spots in your 8 man pen at least.  That was the hidden value in Irvin last year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Teams wouldn't sac bunt against Bautista in extra innings because he was striking everyone out.  That's big.  

I like Kimbrel.  I hope we get this wrapped up soon.  He's the first big domino we need.  Elias can then pivot to the trade market for a reliever or two that has as at least one option.  You need two flexible spots in your 8 man pen at least.  That was the hidden value in Irvin last year.  

That is the rub here. And Elias mentioned that concept in an interview on MLB Network a couple hours ago.

Assuming Kimbrel gets wrapped up, that leaves you with a bullpen of Kimbrel, Cano, Coulombe, Wells, Hall, Perez, Irvin, and Tate (assuming health across the board). Of those guys, Cano, Tate, Wells and Hall have options, but of them who realistically would be optioned? Tate...maybe, depending on how he comes back from injury. In a pinch, I guess one of the others could to get a fresh arm, but then you're without them for at least 10 days. 

Having someone with flexibility would be nice, but then who do we DFA to get that? It'll be interesting to see if the Orioles do anything else for the pen (aside from minor league signings).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HakunaSakata said:

This. I think hitters figured him out. As much of a feel good story as Cano was in the first half, it's not like he had a track record of success before 2022. 

I still think he's a sub-3 ERA type guy.  A good 'get out of jail' GB pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • So what is the real story on his defense? Because if he's playable at 3B, there is a spot for him to play. Mateo has been seeing his numbers slide down of late (notwithstanding the homer and triple this week). And while Urias had that surge, he seems to be trailing off again as well.  Now, if he's just not playable at 3B defensively, that's a different story and we are in a position where he gets the Kjerstad/Stowers treatment with very limited playing time.  
    • Elias has a plan and he's sticking to it. However, the UCL explosions in our arms are definitely his first unforeseen, unplanned bump in the road. A lot of teams are going through this right now. In my opinion, reading the tea leaves, I felt he was trying "catch up" in the early years of the rebuild by going hard after top position talent in the draft. At the same time, he was using trades to catch up on pitching. He wasn't doing a bad job addressing pitching, but in order to "catch up," drafting top positional talent was smart. Someone said it earlier in this thread, its easier to hit on position players and they're less volatile The O's brass were not disregarding their pitching plan, but they were trying also keep pace by introducing better player development, analytics, and tech. They were drafting "sleeper arms" in the later rounds of the draft while also quietly acquiring a lot of depth and talent in the international market. Last years draft was the 1st one that I felt Elias had a focus on drafting better pitching talent. He's a guy that I believe will use his high picks on "best player" available typically, but moving forward, the positional depth allows them to slot more pitchers at the top of their draft list. In a perfect world, Elias has none of these injuries to deal with and we appear as a Mega pitching program bc we have plenty of starter depth at the MLB level. Last years draft, along with a bunch of DSL arms that have started to creep into A-/A+ give us some good lower level depth. Again, w/o the injuries, we can hide the fact that we are VERY thin at the AA/AAA levels. In 2026, the international depth and the recent drafts depth would have probably met in a perfect storm of talent on the MLB roster, and he'd really look like a genius. But losing Bautista, Bradish, Means, Wells to UCL/TJs, and also having Columbe and Kremer miss time with injuries exposes that gap in our system's pitching depth that Elias was hoping to hide for another season or two.  
    • “And now in late June, it's coming unglued.” Literally right there in your post. 
    • Do you think AAA in 2024 is the same as it was in 2022?
    • I’m taking the over even if he gets called up THIS WEEK 
    • Once again, the O’s have done so well over the past few seasons, people forget what it’s like to have a losing streak. The Dodgers lost five in a row earlier this season. It’s doubtful that their fans think the sky is falling.    Nobody likes to lose games but the bright side is, it seems to be at the right time because the Yankees are struggling too. 
    • Nice to see him hitting well and obviously healthy. Plus he's showing a little extra base pop which was something that was always missing from him in pro ball. Certainly worth keeping an eye on him and seeing how fast they will get him to more age appropriate players in AA.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...