Jump to content

Go get ________________________________


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

What worries me is that Elias has already known about this.  So the Burnes trade was the reactionary move.  

I doubt it. It was pretty clear from the beginning of the winter that Elias wanted to acquire a TOR starter, and I believe him that Burnes was his preference from the get go. 

Just like the Burnes trade wasn't actually related to the ownership change, I think it's not related to the Bradish injury. 

Edited by Spy Fox
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spy Fox said:

I doubt it. It was pretty clear from the beginning of the winter that Elias wanted to acquire a TOR starter, and I believe him that Burnes was his preference from the get go. 

Just like the Burnes trade wasn't actually related to the ownership change, I think it's not related to the Bradish injury. 

I believe this to be true as well. What I can't believe is Elias know about Bradish and hasn't done anything else. I think there's something he's not telling us with all of this. He's been working on trying to find a replacement and nothing has landed yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really depends on how bad this Bradish injury REALLY is. If he's back in May, then I'm in on Lorenzen as he's a guy (like Wells and Irvin) that can start or relieve and has experience in both. If not, I want to shoot higher. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

I believe this to be true as well. What I can't believe is Elias know about Bradish and hasn't done anything else. I think there's something he's not telling us with all of this. He's been working on trying to find a replacement and nothing has landed yet.

Does Elias have the budget to sign a FA SP?  Even one of Clevenger, Lorenzen, or Ryu? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

I believe @Frobby listed projected arbitration increases for our core 10 players would exceed our current top 10 players by about $20m or so four years from now. If that's where payrolls are going (and they should be) I'd like to see them go ahead and make that payroll jump to +/- $120m starting this year and giving Montgomery +/-$25m a year. His contract would come off the books as you'd need to start paying $25m+ to Adley/Gunnar/Holliday.

My projection for the cost of our top 10 younger players was:

2024 $10 mm

2025 $21 mm

2026 $46 mm

2027 $89 mm

This did not include our current outfielders, Mountcastle or veteran pitchers.  Just Rutschman, Henderson, Holliday, Westburg, Cowser, Kjerstad, Bradish, Rodriguez, Kremer and Bautista, assuming none of those guys are traded.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

I believe this to be true as well. What I can't believe is Elias know about Bradish and hasn't done anything else. I think there's something he's not telling us with all of this. He's been working on trying to find a replacement and nothing has landed yet.

I think it's pretty widely known that there's a LOT that Elias doesn't tell us.  That how he rolls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

I'm taking Getz at his word that Cease is their opening day starter. 

Therefore, I'm going to sign Lorenzen to a 2/$24 deal. He would help a lot, especially when it comes to not having to vulture guys from the bullpen. At some point, Lorenzen can go to the bullpen since he's done that before. 2 year deal protects you because next year Burnes is gone, Means is gone, and Bradish may or may not be under recovering from TJS. 

Why would you give him the second guaranteed year?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bieber and Karinchak from Cleveland.  Maybe for Hays or Santander or Mountcastle and a mid prospect

Cease for Westburg, Povich and Beavers

sign Matt Chapman for 3rd for 2 years

Burnes

Cease

Rodriguez

Bieber

Kremer/Means/Bradish

Kimbrel

Cano

Karinchak

Perez

Wells

Culombe

Tate

Irvin

 

Rutschman

Mountcastle

Holliday

Henderson

Chapman

Hays/Santander

Mullins

Cowser

Kjerstand

 

McCann

Mateo

Urias

Stowers

O’Hearn

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Why would you give him the second guaranteed year?  

For the reasons that I stated in the post: Means and Burnes are gone next year, Bradish may be gone as well, and there are holes in the bullpen. Lorenzen just protects you next year in a variety of ways. Don't get me wrong, I'd take him on a 1-year deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I doubt Ortiz will have an 800+ OPS all year but I guess its possible. Right now the trade looks like a win for both teams. Milwaukee of course gets 5 more years after this to fully reap the benefits. 
    • Probably because of pitch count. Doesn’t change my point. 
    • Robert would be a significant upgrade over Mullins (offensively). Not sure how much of a difference the two have defensively. But as much as I like Mullins, he has been really bad with the bat in his hand for about a season now. Second half of last season and most of the first half of this season. Obviously the issue with Robert is his health/availability, so there would be risk there. But I wouldn't mind if Elias took a swing there, as long as this wouldn't be his only move. I would like to see Elias act bold and decisively this go round (at the deadline). I heard that the CHI SOX wanted a "Soto like" package (that the Nats got for trading him to the Pads) back for Robert. We know that they have a recent history of over asking on players they are in theory willing to trade. Anybody have a guess on what the realistic costs for Robert would be?
    • This is all correct. And to add to it, If Gunnar only continues being this version of Gunnar, he is out-valued only by the sole two-way player in baseball (Ohtani). So, comparing Soto to Gunnar in a vacuum might make some sense, their situations are vastly different. The closeness of the young guys has been well documented and we know that the group of Adley, Gunnar, Mountcastle, Stowers, Westy and Cowser are all strong in their faith. I do believe that will play some part in the contract finagling. I do not know any of them personally and with the union, the pressure of the sport, endorsements, etc. etc. ... I realize that at the end of the day guys are going to want what they are worth but I have long thought two things about this crop of players: they are incredibly consistent but they also seem to be genuinely good kids who want to win and put the team first. We don't know yet what will happen over the next few years with these players but I wouldn't be surprised to see a version of what the cast of Friends did early in the show's run, where they essentially formed their own union of sorts and structured their compensation so that none of them would become bigger than the sum of their parts. Again, I don't know them personally and I am fully in-tune with the idea that they all want to be paid but I think that their closeness means more to them than Soto's relationship with his teammates in Washington, and I think that holds true with respect to almost literally any other free agent in the history of the game. They are very unique in that they have this young group who are all 23 - 27 right now who are very tight. I happen to think that the stars of this team will be more inclined to consider more team-friendly deals if it means that their posse can stay in-tact for a longer duration of time. Call me naïve but that's how I see it. I've been intimately involved in the game at various levels myself and I can honestly say that I can't remember a group of young players who demonstrated a caring for each other to the same level of these kids. It could mean nothing when Gunnar is being thrown half a billion dollars or when Adley is offered the moon but I just don't see these players being as motivated by money as other (especially recent) stars.  I agree 100% that Gunnar would jump all over that Witt Jr. deal. I think he is smart enough to know that anything could happen over the next five years. Plus $288 million is a shitload of money. I don't know how  many generations of wealth that is but damn that's a lot of money for a soon to be 23 year old kid.   
    • There is a lot to like and I can't see why nobody would want him but for the possibility that he won't help the team much in October 2024, the cost would probably be an absurd ask.
    • I think the focus is going to be on relief pitching.   I don't think any of the guys SG listed would be needed for the types of relievers the O's will be going after.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...