Jump to content

Now, I want you to remember....


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

@Moose Milligan did you have to adjust the tint of your monitor when you typed this? You know, to account for the orange glasses? :)

 

giphy.gif

@wildcard @Billy F-Face3 and @sportsfan8703 stole my orange glasses, drunk off their asses on spiked orange Kool-Aid.  It was a terrible experience, one that I don't care to remember.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't have an abiding dislike for the man I'm just irked when folks do things like cite one type of WAR without identifying it.

He wasn't the worst thing ever but I also don't think he was a needed addition.  Westburg outproduced him by rate even using rWAR.

I don't think you appreciate how different you are than others.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but if I was to look up a player's WAR, I'd go to BBref and tell you what it said. I know there's two different versions, but I don't know the difference and my base assumption is that the difference wouldn't be very significant. Maybe that's wrong, but I don't think it's subterfuge to not provide a citation for a WAR stat.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LookinUp said:

I don't think you appreciate how different you are than others.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but if I was to look up a player's WAR, I'd go to BBref and tell you what it said. I know there's two different versions, but I don't know the difference and my base assumption is that the difference wouldn't be very significant. Maybe that's wrong, but I don't think it's subterfuge to not provide a citation for a WAR stat.

I'm not opposed to just using the one, but you should identify which one you use.  Sometimes they are close (Westburg) and sometimes they differ greatly (Frazier).  It isn't difficult to put a lower case r or f in front of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Too Tall said:

My reocurring nightmare  -  when we play the Pirates, Frazier has the winning hit in all the games and OH explodes. Can we just let Adam Frazier rest in peace?

It's worse than that-- he signed with the Royals, so he has twice as many opportunities. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ADAM FRAZIER?   Adam was responsible for many clutch exciting moments of those 101 wins!!.  The “Shohei Who? “ hr, the MFY HR off the foulpole at Yankee Stadium, Judge falling on his face, and of course the last series Rays clutch double off Fairbanks in the ninth which was a great moment and sounded like the Delmon moment !! .. show me the Bryan Baker highlight reel?  You can keep your fWAR.. give me moments like these! 

 

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't have an abiding dislike for the man I'm just irked when folks do things like cite one type of WAR without identifying it.

He wasn't the worst thing ever but I also don't think he was a needed addition.  Westburg outproduced him by rate even using rWAR.

Since math is obviously not a strong point of certain posters...

By rWAR:

Frazier- 1.7 rWAR in 455 PA.

Westburg- 1.2 rWAR in 228 PA.

Now this is almost exactly twice the PA so it's pretty easy to see that Westburg accumulated rWAR at a much higher rate.

In the interest of full disclosure Westburg had 1.1 fWAR.

 

His fWAR (Westburg) was completely carried by his defense. Oddly enough, Frazier has always been a decent defender until the wheels fell off him last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t understand why Frazier was signed, or Brett Phillips, or several other guys who weren’t as good as what we already had.

 Will ME bring in another needless, roster-clogging guy yet again? That’s the main question.

I agree with Moose’s point, but remind the crowd that NY was plagued with injuries which-probably-cost them a dozen or so wins. They are back to full strength now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

I don’t understand why Frazier was signed, or Brett Phillips, or several other guys who weren’t as good as what we already had.

 Will ME bring in another needless, roster-clogging guy yet again? That’s the main question.

I agree with Moose’s point, but remind the crowd that NY was plagued with injuries which-probably-cost them a dozen or so wins. They are back to full strength now.

Where are you getting the 12-win number from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Bit of a dead cat bounce?

Sure, very possible.

Yeah, even the projection systems have him going from -10.5 dWAR to -1.8 at the low end to 2.1 at the high end. He was worth 4.4 in 2022. Not our problem this year but I'm sure someone will be watching it lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Heh, just saw this... Michael Kopech Drawing Interest From Several Teams  
    • You know I love to speculate about trade ideas and I'd love to have both Robert and Kopech, but... While Robert is the only potential superstar among positional targets he would probably be an unneccesary risk for the O's.  The issue with Robert, as we all know, is health.  His injury history is pretty damning.    Kopech is a potential stud reliever if we could harness his potential.  Kopech's pitched poorly last year and thus far this season but looked like a future star after the 2022 season.  The 28-year-old has a dynamic arm and could be a great addition if he were able to regain his prior form.  He is, however, controlled only through next season.  With all of that said I could see Elias dealing for Kopech, as he has added arms that had less than ideal performance, but good upside.   Regarding your idea: Dealing Kremer makes little sense to me as he's a solid #4/5 starter on a team that may be looking to add another starter to the mix, not deal one away.  The W-Sox would be looking to add prospects and with Roberts' contract a bargain if he's healthy, I wouldn't think Mullins or Hays would appeal to Chicago.  Best guess for Robert and Kopech:  Kjerstad, Bradfield, Baumeister (RHP) and Leandro Arias (SS) might be about right. Might.  
    • Attending this evenings game. Does the light rail run x number of hours after a game ends--even with rain delays? I am pretty bummed about the weather forecast but hoping for the best.  
    • Yeah, I didn't even look at who was starting tonight for the Phillies so that's my bad.   I hope they find ways to get Stowers some more at bats though.
    • I'm flattered, SG!   Let's start that podcast we were talking about that one time.
    • He’s definitely not playing vs a sub 2 ERA starter.  Gunnar and one of Mullins or Cowsers will probably be the only lefties in the lineup tonight.
    • lol…I was just naming people.  You can put anyone’s name.  Consider yourself lucky that you were the first poster that popped into my head. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...