Jump to content

2024 Prospect Power Rankings


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

@Tony-OH This is a tough question to preface, but would it be fair in your estimation to say the following players have either been disappointing as Top 5 Round draft picks (2019-2022), or at least unlikely to ever be productive major leaguers? 

  • Zach Watson (2019 3rd round) No longer with the organization?
  • Hudson Haskin (2020 2nd round)
  • Anthony Servideo (2020 3rd round)
  • Reed Trimble (2021 2nd round)
  • John Rhodes (2021 3rd round)
  • Donta Williams (2021 4th round)
  • Max Wagner (2022 2nd round)
  • Silas Ardoin (2022 4th round)

To be clear, I love what Elias has done as GM.  I have, however, noticed a pattern of his taking college bats after Round 1 that have mostly not amounted to much. 
From 2019, 2nd rounder Kyle Stowers has made it to the big leagues, though he's not that highly considered.  Still, a solid 2nd round pick and one that could play in the league for some years to come as a reserve. 
Also from 2019 is 4th rounder Joey Ortiz, who was a great pick that helped us net Corbin Burnes.
I thought about including Jud Fabian, a 2022 2nd rounder, but feel there is still hope he'll be able to contribute.

I'd much prefer to see higher upside HS bats get more in the mix in these early rounds.

Anyway, I'd love your input on this, as I may be missing something or just being a bit unfair in my critique of these picks. Thanks.


 

Edited by Greg Pappas
Misspelled Rhodes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

@Tony-OHThis is a tough question to preface, but would it be fair in your estimation to say the following players have either been disappointing as Top 5 Round draft picks (2019-2022), or at least unlikely to ever be productive major leaguers? 

  • Zach Watson (2019 3rd round) No longer with the organization?
  • Hudson Haskin (2020 2nd round)
  • Anthony Servideo (2020 3rd round)
  • Reed Trimble (2021 2nd round)
  • John Rhoades (2021 3rd round)
  • Donta Williams (2021 4th round)
  • Max Wagner (2022 2nd round)
  • Silas Ardoin (2022 4th round)

To be clear, I love what Elias has done as GM.  I have, however, noticed a pattern of his taking college bats after Round 1 that have mostly not amounted to much. 
From 2019, 2nd rounder Kyle Stowers has made it to the big leagues, though he's not that highly considered.  Still, a solid 2nd round pick and one that could play in the league for some years to come as a reserve. 
Also from 2019 is 4th rounder Joey Ortiz, who was a great pick that helped us net Corbin Burnes.
I thought about including Jud Fabian, a 2022 2nd rounder, but feel there is still hope he'll be able to contribute.

I'd much prefer to see higher upside HS bats get more in the mix in these early rounds.

Anyway, I'd love your input on this, as I may be missing something or just being a bit unfair in my critique of these picks. Thanks.


 

I think if you look at the drafts from those 2nd and 3rd rounds you are going to see most teams miss more than they hit. I would like to see Elias take more high school players in the top 5 rounds since he's had pretty good success (Gunnar, Hernaiz, Mayo), but if you look at those rounds you can see lots of HS busts as well. 

 Elias has obviously hit pretty well, but he's going to miss more than he hits because that's just the nature of the draft.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of guys on that list have also just had a very hard time staying healthy.  Haskin has done some good things but missed a lot of time.  Servideo missed a lot of time.  Ardoin actually has had a decent career so far for a 4th rounder.

Reed Trimble is another guy that just can't stay on the field.  Looks like he made it about 2 weeks this year before going on the IL yet again.  Not sure what the injury is (yes RZ I did google it :))

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of it hasn't been his fault, but the sand does feel mostly out of the hourglass for Haskin becoming a $2 million draft pool dollar total loss.

To be clear, Elias' team's overall success rate has been Stephen Curry levels of brilliant such that it looks fairly likely today the 2023-2030 Orioles will run circles around the other 29 Clubs at position player WAR, so searching for an expensive bust is kind of a humblebrag parlor game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/29/2024 at 5:35 PM, Greg Pappas said:

@Tony-OHThis is a tough question to preface, but would it be fair in your estimation to say the following players have either been disappointing as Top 5 Round draft picks (2019-2022), or at least unlikely to ever be productive major leaguers? 

  • Zach Watson (2019 3rd round) No longer with the organization?
  • Hudson Haskin (2020 2nd round)
  • Anthony Servideo (2020 3rd round)
  • Reed Trimble (2021 2nd round)
  • John Rhoades (2021 3rd round)
  • Donta Williams (2021 4th round)
  • Max Wagner (2022 2nd round)
  • Silas Ardoin (2022 4th round)

To be clear, I love what Elias has done as GM.  I have, however, noticed a pattern of his taking college bats after Round 1 that have mostly not amounted to much. 
From 2019, 2nd rounder Kyle Stowers has made it to the big leagues, though he's not that highly considered.  Still, a solid 2nd round pick and one that could play in the league for some years to come as a reserve. 
Also from 2019 is 4th rounder Joey Ortiz, who was a great pick that helped us net Corbin Burnes.
I thought about including Jud Fabian, a 2022 2nd rounder, but feel there is still hope he'll be able to contribute.

I'd much prefer to see higher upside HS bats get more in the mix in these early rounds.

Anyway, I'd love your input on this, as I may be missing something or just being a bit unfair in my critique of these picks. Thanks.


 

Almost seems like you read my post in the draft section on Wednesday afternoon.

”Fair point.  Stowers, Watson, Ortiz, Trimble, Rhodes, Donta Williams, Haskin, Servideo, Fabian, Wagner, Ardoin,  are all college position players taken in rounds 2-4.   Maybe Stowers and Fabian carve out a part time role as ML players.   We’ve done well at the top of the draft with this demographic but Ortiz is the only college position player after round that looks like starting material.  The two best of this group, Ortiz and Stowers were taken back in 2019.   We haven’t done so well since then.”

The 2023 draft will be interesting to follow.  Horvath is a power guy off to a bad start.  They went with more pitching with Baumeister and Lord and went with a bunch of guys who could play CF.”

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

A lot of guys on that list have also just had a very hard time staying healthy.  Haskin has done some good things but missed a lot of time.  Servideo missed a lot of time.  Ardoin actually has had a decent career so far for a 4th rounder.

Reed Trimble is another guy that just can't stay on the field.  Looks like he made it about 2 weeks this year before going on the IL yet again.  Not sure what the injury is (yes RZ I did google it :))

Glenn, you’re a very good poster but apparently a bad Googler.  No problemo.  This was reported April 26.

Injuries: MASN’s Steve Melewski reported that Bowie’s Zach Peek (right shoulder inflammation) and Aberdeen’s Reed Trimble (right hamstring discomfort) were both placed on the injured list yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Almost seems like you read my post in the draft section on Wednesday afternoon.

”Fair point.  Stowers, Watson, Ortiz, Trimble, Rhodes, Donta Williams, Haskin, Servideo, Fabian, Wagner, Ardoin,  are all college position players taken in rounds 2-4.   Maybe Stowers and Fabian carve out a part time role as ML players.   We’ve done well at the top of the draft with this demographic but Ortiz is the only college position player after round that looks like starting material.  The two best of this group, Ortiz and Stowers were taken back in 2019.   We haven’t done so well since then.”

The 2023 draft will be interesting to follow.  Horvath is a power guy off to a bad start.  They went with more pitching with Baumeister and Lord and went with a bunch of guys who could play CF.”

I hadn't read that, but it seems we are thinking similar things. 😃  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

@Tony-OH Luis Almeyda keeps steadily rising?  What am I missing?  I saw he had a pretty good last week of May.  Leads me To believe that maybe you e heard something about him from one of your sources.  

More like other guys keep falling. lol

He's been doing ok overall of late and I've heard the tools are good, but we'll see. He has not been overly impressive so far in his pro career but he's still young. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Glad to see Stiven Acevedo make the list!  I have high hopes for him.  He’s been on a heater and his numbers are starting to garner some attention.  

Acevedo has been my under dog guy for a bit. He just looks like a ball player and has some nice tools, but he needs to keep this hot streak going and add some power.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

More like other guys keep falling. lol

He's been doing ok overall of late and I've heard the tools are good, but we'll see. He has not been overly impressive so far in his pro career but he's still young. 

Thanks.  I was hoping you weren’t going to say that but had a feeling that was the case. 
 

Agree on Acevedo - he looks the part.  You can’t teach his size and speed and athleticism.  I hope he keeps it up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

More like other guys keep falling. lol

He's been doing ok overall of late and I've heard the tools are good, but we'll see. He has not been overly impressive so far in his pro career but he's still young. 

I was going tonask the general trend in the muddled middle too...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • ??? The only sports where people peak younger than 20 is stuff like womens gymnastics and figure skating, where women have to delay puberty in order to maintain a body type ideal for the sport.  Nearly every other sport's athletes between 22-27.
    • Ok several of you want to compare JH to Gunnar.  I am happy to do so: JH is 20 years old and has a .909 OPS at AAA after putting up a .941 OPS as a 19 year old at four levels. As a 20 year old Gunnar had a .826 OPS across three levels, .944 at A, .775 at A+ and .561 at AA (5 games) Even at 21 Gunnar went back to AA for almost half a season and his OPS at AA was .894 I am not saying JH will be as good as Gunnar but people saying we should trade for some pitcher we could have for a year or two have lost touch with common sense.
    • To be honest i wont know.  I know im in the absolute minority here but when the robo umps show up, im outa here.  Im barely hanging on now due to the recent rule changes the last few years.  Baseball and football has changed so much lately ive really lost interest.  I actually just cancelled Fubo just so i can save some money.    
    • That's a good point as an OF I read swings but it's different on dirt.  I could freeze knowing my speed would make up for a poor read-no time to do that on dirt.  There was more time to think in the OF which was good and bad. To your second point- I didn't think about it until now but in my coaching experience some kids-the really good OF's were just flat out better at tracking balls than others-combination of eyesight and instincts-not sure but you brought up a good point.   JH would likely be an plus CF given what we know about him but it will take reps otherwise you're giving up outs and advances.  FWIW-Slotting JH into CF would run somewhat counter intuitive to drafting EBJ and Josenberger (who really only provide value in CF) in the last draft.  
    • I understand but again a contending team is not going to trade a good pitcher for someone who can leave the team end of year. 
    • First of all, pretty much everyone that wears an MLB uniform is a good enough athlete to play just about any sport to at least a d3 collegiate level, and likely d1, Holliday included.  The only exceptions would be people that have hard size limitations.  (e.g. Corbin Carroll or Jose Altuve are unlikely to be football players simply due to their size.  And Altuve isn't going to cut it in basketball for the same reason.)  But for sports like skateboarding or any swing sports like tennis or golf?  I guarantee JH could be a high level college athlete if not a pro player if he focused on them.  If you're arguing that Gunnar has athleticism/body control that's elite even among MLB standards, and Holliday doesn't.... maybe I'd agree with you?  But Gunnar is always going to have his arm tool over Holliday.  In my limited time viewing Holliday, I'd actually rate Holliday's body control to be better than Gunnar's, but a large part of that is because Gunnar is 6'4" 220, and Holliday is 6' 190.  I'd also say that Gunnar having the body control and athleticism he has given his size is pretty exceptional, so if you want to bring up his combination of size and athleticism/body control, I'd agree with you.   But you're coming off like Uncle Rico in Napoleon Dynamite, while implying that someone who's like 89th percentile sprint speed isn't an elite athlete even among other MLB players, and that is just outlandish to me.   
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...