Jump to content

Chayce McDermott 2024


Frobby

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Conway12 said:

 

68% Strike Rate (sorry if this upsets anyone, lol). Needed 105 pitches pitches to get through 5 innings though. 

 

I'll take this outing all day. 1 walk is all I really care about. Keep cookin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Conway12 said:

 

68% Strike Rate (sorry if this upsets anyone, lol). Needed 105 pitches pitches to get through 5 innings though. 

 

It's kind of unusual to throw 105 pitches in 5 innings while only allowing 5 hits and one walk, and throwing 68% strikes.  There must have been a ton of foul balls.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Frobby said:

It's kind of unusual to throw 105 pitches in 5 innings while only allowing 5 hits and one walk, and throwing 68% strikes.  There must have been a ton of foul balls.   

Looks like he had 30 pitches that were fouled off. I don't really have any reference if that is high or low, but sounds high to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Conway12 said:

Looks like he had 30 pitches that were fouled off. I don't really have any reference if that is high or low, but sounds high to me. 

That’s a ton.  An average major leaguer throws 63.9% strikes and 27.8% of those are fouled off.  So maybe 18% of pitches are fouled off.  McDermott probably had 8-9 more foul balls than you’d normally expect. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dominant start continuing a string of 3 great starts, most importantly completely reversing the walk problem. 21 whiffs is a huge number, good to see after the start with all the foul balls.

Maybe the back issue is under control now or he’s made some mechanical tweaks? He’s back to looking like a guy who may be ready to contribute down the stretch this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Dominant start continuing a string of 3 great starts, most importantly completely reversing the walk problem. 21 whiffs is a huge number, good to see after the start with all the foul balls.

Maybe the back issue is under control now or he’s made some mechanical tweaks? He’s back to looking like a guy who may be ready to contribute down the stretch this year.

Dominant start in which he allowed 4 ER on 8 hits (including a homer and three doubles) in 5 innings?   Relevant facts omitted by On the Verge in their tweet.  

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Dominant start continuing a string of 3 great starts, most importantly completely reversing the walk problem. 21 whiffs is a huge number, good to see after the start with all the foul balls.

Maybe the back issue is under control now or he’s made some mechanical tweaks? He’s back to looking like a guy who may be ready to contribute down the stretch this year.

It’s great to see the low walks and high strikeouts but the boxscore says 8 hits and 4 runs in 5 innings.  Unless I’m just being Billy Boxscore that’s not dominant but it does look like he’s on the right track and might help at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, I’ll admit I did not check how he did outside of that tweet, but yeah quite an omission and not fair to call that start dominant. But with McDermott I’m very much focused on the BB rate, and the K/whiff rates since he’s going to be a higher BB guy even with improvements so he will need to offset that with K’s.

So the 27 K / 3 BB in 16.2 IP and piling up the whiffs are the only factors I’m really paying attention to anyway. Those are the most predictive, and on the season (even with the terrible walk rates) he hasn’t had an issue with hard contact and an ERA out of line with his peripherals (it’s been the exact opposite, he’s been well ahead of his FIP/xFIP). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Haha, I’ll admit I did not check how he did outside of that tweet, but yeah quite an omission and not fair to call that start dominant. But with McDermott I’m very much focused on the BB rate, and the K/whiff rates since he’s going to be a higher BB guy even with improvements so he will need to offset that with K’s.

So the 27 K / 3 BB in 16.2 IP and piling up the whiffs are the only factors I’m really paying attention to anyway. Those are the most predictive, and on the season (even with the terrible walk rates) he hasn’t had an issue with hard contact and an ERA out of line with his peripherals (it’s been the exact opposite, he’s been well ahead of his FIP/xFIP). 

I think there were positives to take from that outing, for sure.  Overall, McDermott has been trending in a better direction the last few outings.  I just am amused at how On the Verge always spins things in the most positive way possible without even mentioning the negative.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

It seems like the last few starts McDermott is now pounding the zone, but letting up some home runs. Maybe they told him, hey just chuck it in there. He still gets a lot of whiffs. I'll take some home runs over a bunch of walks. Let's see if he can find the sweet spot. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Dominant start continuing a string of 3 great starts, most importantly completely reversing the walk problem. 21 whiffs is a huge number, good to see after the start with all the foul balls.

Maybe the back issue is under control now or he’s made some mechanical tweaks? He’s back to looking like a guy who may be ready to contribute down the stretch this year.

From the video, it looks like he really gets on top of the ball and drives it down.  Giving him that "heavy fastball".  He's not the closer that we need, but he most certainly looks to be an option as a middle relief impact arm for the MLB team later this season.  

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's not just that. But it's all of it (I would argue). It's the message that the org has made to the fans/potential paying customers through their actions, that we are not willing to do what it takes to be excellent. Yes we will give you a good team but we are not ever going to be committed to becoming great. That goes into the crappy ball park, the refusal to add meaningful payroll no matter what, the dogmatic adherence to "budget ball", etc. Who's the face of the Rays? They had Longoria for a long time, but everyone else they got rid of when the time came to trade them or keep them. (Except Franco and who knows what will happen there?) Every time that they have had a team in serious WS discission/contention, they never make meaningful adds to that team to try to win it all. What big FA have they ever signed? IMO all those things matter as the message you send to the potential customer/fan.
    • I didn't know this, I suspect a lot of people who aren't fans of the Padres didn't know this.
    • Stuff+ doesn't look at if a ball is a strike or not. What good is having incredible Stuff+ numbers if you have a WHIP of 1.500. I'm sure Fujinami has great Stuff+ numbers but we all know he can't pitch. I have no idea what PitchingBot is, but Kopech's FIP is 5.67. His xERA is 4.26 and the statcast models do not LOVE Kopech. His Pitching Run Value is negative for every pitch he throws. He's well below average in every area except for xBA, Fastball Velocity, Whiff%, K% and Extension. Every other model is below average to poor. He's prone to giving up HRs as well.
    • I don’t agree at all.  Everyone knows Boras’ reputation for playing hardball with teams and often taking players to free agency.  If you hire him, you do it because that’s the kind of agent you want.  The players’ aren’t innocents being led down the wrong path by Boras.  They’re going down the path they choose.   
    • Oh, please!   There you go again.
    • Sure.  I agree to an extent.   Elias obviously enjoys having depth, both for the ML team and for trading pieces.  It’s just my opinion that there are certain guys he’s unwilling to include.   He should be able to get upgrades even without those three on the table.   Hypothetically, if Elias offered Kjerstad + for Crochet and the WS insisted on Basallo or Mayo, I believe Elias would move to plan B.   He’s willing to give up something for short term gains but he’s going to draw the line somewhere.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...