Jump to content

Kyle Stowers 2024


Jagwar

Recommended Posts

Looking at Savant, they have Stowers sprint speed at 28.3.   In 2022 it was 27.0 and in 2023 it was 25.9.   I realize those are based on limited amount of runs, but he does look lighter and faster than I remember in his previous two ML stints.  He always looked like he could catch anything he got to but now he looks like he can get there.  Really starting to think we lose nothing defensively when he’s out there instead of Hays.   I don’t think Hays gets to the ball Cowser caught in the 6th inning.  Maybe Stowers doesn’t either but maybe.  Hays?  No way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to assume it was too painful to swing, otherwise being in his position there’s no way I’m asking out of a game or giving them any reason to take me out.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rk. Player Team Age Position Competitive Runs Bolts HP to 1B Sprint Speed (ft / sec)
1 622761.png Mateo, Jorge  BAL 29 2B 47 19 4.20 30.0
2 676059.png Westburg, Jordan  BAL 25 3B 77 4 4.26 28.9
3 683002.png Henderson, Gunnar  BAL 23 SS 101 6 4.26 28.7
4 702616.png Holliday, Jackson  BAL 20 2B 11     28.7
5 669065.png Stowers, Kyle  BAL 26 LF 11     28.4
6 681297.png Cowser, Colton  BAL 24 LF 70   4.25 28.0

 

Surprised me the Stowers is actually faster than Cowser who has been filling in for Mullins in CF. This suggests to me he might be playable in CF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jabba72 said:
Rk. Player Team Age Position Competitive Runs Bolts HP to 1B Sprint Speed (ft / sec)
1 622761.png Mateo, Jorge  BAL 29 2B 47 19 4.20 30.0
2 676059.png Westburg, Jordan  BAL 25 3B 77 4 4.26 28.9
3 683002.png Henderson, Gunnar  BAL 23 SS 101 6 4.26 28.7
4 702616.png Holliday, Jackson  BAL 20 2B 11     28.7
5 669065.png Stowers, Kyle  BAL 26 LF 11     28.4
6 681297.png Cowser, Colton  BAL 24 LF 70   4.25 28.0

 

Surprised me the Stowers is actually faster than Cowser who has been filling in for Mullins in CF. This suggests to me he might be playable in CF.

The other takeaway here is that Mullins isn't in the top 6 in sprint speed on the team, which is kind of wild. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that the sprint speed numbers are averages for competitive runs.  IIRC on broadcast there was instance of Cowser running over 30 ft/sec beating a potential double play grounder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

 

In AAA, Stowers (91.9) had some of the best Adjusted EVs on the team. He's only behind Coby Mayo (who is 5th overall in all of AAA at 93.4) and Holliday (92 MPH) on the Tides. Holliday 69th in all of AAA and Stowers is 80th overall.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once Stowers is healthy, I think it's about time for Cowser and him to at least be splitting playing time evenly if not a lean more toward Stowers. Cowser has had about three good weeks with very little before or since that time. That is not enough for him to be higher on the depth chart than Stowers at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/10/2024 at 12:34 PM, interloper said:

The other takeaway here is that Mullins isn't in the top 6 in sprint speed on the team, which is kind of wild. 

People get an idea about someone’s speed and don’t adjust their perception as the player ages and slows.  You look at Mullins’ sprint speeds by year and it’s a slow but steady downward projection, which shouldn’t surprise anyone: 29.3, 29.0, 28.6, 28.5, 28.5, 28.0, 27.8.   He’s still in the 67th percentile of all players, but he’s 37th out of 47 among ptlayers listed as CF.  He’s simply not that fast anymore.  He’s got solid instincts both in the field and on the basepaths that allow him to use what speed he has to maximum advantage, but he’s no speedster.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

People get an idea about someone’s speed and don’t adjust their perception as the player ages and slows.  You look at Mullins’ sprint speeds by year and it’s a slow but steady downward projection, which shouldn’t surprise anyone: 29.3, 29.0, 28.6, 28.5, 28.5, 28.0, 27.8.   He’s still in the 67th percentile of all players, but he’s 37th out of 47 among ptlayers listed as CF.  He’s simply not that fast anymore.  He’s got solid instincts both in the field and on the basepaths that allow him to use what speed he has to maximum advantage, but he’s no speedster.   

Which was always part of the reason why the thought of extending him never made much sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Which was always part of the reason why the thought of extending him never made much sense.

Can’t argue with you on that.  It certainly always made sense to wait to see how Mullins aged.  

As an aside, I was just looking at Kevin Pillar.  Never was faster than 28.7, but he’s sat 28.2 now as a 35 year old.  He’s actually gotten faster the last two years.   I’m not sure if that’s a SSS thing or if he has been doing some serious speed training the last couple of offseasons after slowing as he aged.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • No earthly way I trade 6 years of a top 20 prospect, catcher or first base, for 2.5 years of a guy who has made 17 major league starts.
    • I never said that and do not believe any of that as Rubenstein didn't even have control of the franchise at that time. And you better believe that if it was still in Angelos hands he would not allow Rubenstein much of any input until ALL of the risk/liability was transferred to Rubenstein. I love your use of the word "methodical" there to describe John Angelos. I have some of other words for it - cheap, miserish, greedy, moneygrubbing, tightwad, terrible, awful ... just to name a few...lol
    • I think the vast majority of people think that playoffs in any professional sport is a crap shoot. I also don't think you'll find anyone on this board that doesn't want to make any additions to this roster. I just take issue with an argument that says there is no way the Orioles could win the WS with their pitching staff. That's over the top and hyperbolic. Just over the past few years, there have been teams that won the WS with pitching staffs that were as good or worse that the Orioles.  '21 Braves starters 3.84, BP 3.97 '19 Nats 3.53, 5.68 '18 Red Sox 3.77, 3.72 '17 Astros 4.03, 4.27 '15 Royals 4.34, 2.72 '13 Red Sox 3.84, 3.70
    • That's the problem with using your top draft choices to draft the best player available: you can end up with an imbalance that makes it difficult to use all the talent you've got. You can reduce the problem by drafting shortstops, many of whom can move to the right along the defensive spectrum, but they can't all do that. And they can't pitch. You can fix an imbalance of talent by trading talented guys who are likely to be blocked by other, more talented guys. But if you're not willing to do that . . .
    • Yup, he's definitely in the same class.
    • You yourself admit that we need some acquisitions. That means that you agree that the team currently is inadequate. So, inadequate for what? I never said we wouldn’t make the playoffs, I said we would “slowly sink.” that’s neither an overreaction, nor certainly not ridiculous. Let me explain what I mean by “slowly sink.” I don’t think we will continue our same winning percentage, I don’t think we will win 100 games, and I don’t think we will win the division. That’s what I meant. If you disagree with those concerns, then you also think we don’t need to make any acquisitions, because you think we’re going to win as many games whether we do or don’t. But I doubt you disagree with them. Instead I think you probably don’t worry about them because even if all those things happen, we can still make the playoffs, and that’s fine, I agree with that I have no desire to be contentious. But those worries are certainly not ridiculous.
    • In a Divisional Series if we played the Mariners and Burnes pitches games 1 and 4 and Rodriguez pitches games 2 and 5 you would really take the Mariners who are scoring 3.9 runs a game and have an 8 run differential versus the Orioles who score 5.0 runs a game and have an 108 run differential because their third and fourth starters are better than the Orioles?  This is why I say the only thing coming unglued is the general sentiment on this message board.  I think we would heavy favorites against the Mariners in a 5 or 7 game series.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...