Jump to content

Colton Cowser 2024


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I don't think anyone would dislike with those numbers, but I'd argue if he puts up those numbers, he's going to get more than 402 PAs this year. Probably close to 500 PAs. So what does his numbers project to at 500 PAs?

I'd be happy to reproject this every 2 weeks, but one assumption I'm making is that there is some regression to his platoon history.  For that reason, I don't think it's nearly as simple as 500/402 times the numbers I posted because his marginal PAs would be disproportionately vs LHP which would be very likely to hurt his rate stats. 

Also need to project for some injury risk if we're talking O/U numbers.  If you were projecting OBJ's receiving yards last year that was a central assumption, but even a young ballplayer needs that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s an example of why it isn’t the worst thing in the world if a player is sent down to work on things. Cowser. Bradish. Stowers and Kjerstad now. 

Cowser worked his butt off this offseason it looks like. Kudos to him and the coaching staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Filmstudy said:

I'd be happy to reproject this every 2 weeks, but one assumption I'm making is that there is some regression to his platoon history.  For that reason, I don't think it's nearly as simple as 500/402 times the numbers I posted because his marginal PAs would be disproportionately vs LHP which would be very likely to hurt his rate stats. 

Also need to project for some injury risk if we're talking O/U numbers.  If you were projecting OBJ's receiving yards last year that was a central assumption, but even a young ballplayer needs that.

I think all that’s fair.  I just think that if he really posts an .862 OPS, he’s highly likely to get more than 402 PA.  Gunnar had 445 PA just in games started by RHP last year, plus 177 in games started by lefties, and his platoon splits were pretty big.  I think if Cowser only ends up at 402 PA, it’ll be because he’s not hitting way better than the other OFs - below .800 OPS, for sure.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Right now its the easiest a ride the hot hand call gets.    I figure as long as a Games On Base streak is going, he's in, though Cole Ragans lineup this weekend will be a challenge if he's everyday until then.

It would be hard for him to do any worse against Ragans than the lineup did in the first matchup.

He might at least drive up the pitch count a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think all that’s fair.  I just think that if he really posts an .862 OPS, he’s highly likely to get more than 402 PA.  Gunnar had 445 PA just in games started by RHP last year, plus 177 in games started by lefties, and his platoon splits were pretty big.  I think if Cowser only ends up at 402 PA, it’ll be because he’s not hitting way better than the other OFs - below .800 OPS, for sure.  

You're probably right that he'd get more PAs and Hyde would eschew any strict platooning, even if splits are big and that would negatively impact my projection.  Incredibly, .800 OPS for the rest of the season (at the same rate of play he's had to date) would bring him in very close to .862 for the season.

One big thing that has changed since the days of Lowenstein/Roenicke is the number of roster spots for hitters and pitchers.  In 1980, that was approximately 15 position players and 10 pitchers.  Now it's 13 and 13.  The change makes straight platooning far more difficult.

As a point of reference, John Lowenstein in 1982 had only 382 PAs despite being the most productive hitter in baseball on a per AB or PA basis with a 1.071 OPS and 194 OPS+.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Looking forward to seeing how he approaches his at bats tomorrow night.

This is what he did at Norfolk.  He did seem a little more passive tonight.   Swing and swing early.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don't know if this explains the Dansby Swanson contract accurately.  Yes, he plays a premium defensive position and does it fairly well, but he was just coming off back to back seasons with 25 and 27 homers.  There was a thought that his bat was finally coming around.  He was a 1st overall pick, teams will always gamble on a guy like that, especially if there's a whiff that he could reach his full potential.  
    • My choice would be Burnes My thought is why not him And Snell AND Roki ?   We can afford it 
    • Yes. Why is this even a pressing question let alone a question at all? He's been worth 6, 3.6, 1.9, and 2.3 fWAR over the last 4 years. He's 30, final year, plays solid to excellent defense, still has plenty of speed (averaged nearly 30 SB the last 4 years), great clubhouse guy, can actually hit righties well and he'll probably end up around $9-$10m. Think you play it back w/ Cowser and Mullins in LF/CF and spend your money on a replacement Santander (O'Neill?) and another OF. 
    • And this is before the Off Season has even begun. I'll wait and see. Elias isn't going to telegraph his moves.
    • Dansby Swanson got himself 9 figures with a career 95 OPS+ because, like Cedric, he plays a premium defensive position well. And Cedric would only get the hypothetical $15 million for 2026 being discussed if he earned it because that is how club options work. To get him to even consider giving the Orioles a club option though, you would have to make it worth his while, and a $1 million dollar buyout definitely does not do so.  
    • Either would be great. I do generally like shorter term contracts because of reducing the risk. But I think I like Burnes more. Snell is 2 years older, which is why I presume you went with 4 years for him, but he does have durability concerns. If we break down each pitcher in terms of times pitching more than, say, 100 IP, 130 IP, 150 IP, and 180 IP: Burnes also hasn't been a full time starter in the majors since 2021. So, presumably, there's less wear/tear.  Think my main takeaway here is that Burnes has been a full time starter in the majors for the last 4 years and he's went 160+ in all 4 and went 190+ in 3 of them. Snell has been entirely used as a starter and has only eclipsed the 160 IP mark 3 out of 9 of his seasons and only once in the last 4 years did he go more than 130 IP.   I'd gladly take either, though.
    • I know many O's fans love Cedric.  And that is fine.   But Cedric has put up a 710 to 721 OPS for the last 3 years.    And while his defense is great not too many players with that OPS gets a 15m salary or a 5m buyout. If you step back and realize that Cedric as good as he is on defense is a platoon player with a 710 to 721 OPS he is likely to consider a club option at 11M for 2026 with a 1M buyout IMO. If you think differently please show the players with a 15m salary and that OPS.   That would be interesting.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...