Jump to content

2024 1st Round Pick (#22): Vance Honeycutt - OF - (Jr) North Carolina (NC)


Recommended Posts

When we drafted Holliday, one guy I felt would have been worth the pick IF you felt you could fix him was Elijah Green. His profile sounds similar to Honeycutt.  There obviously wasn’t a Holliday there to take over Honeycutt this time but it does show that the Os certainly aren’t scared to go after these types of guys. 
 

I know we saw that with Fabian but he was a little later and cheaper. 
 

Good chance this pick busts but most bottom of the first round picks do and the swing for the fences approach here is welcomed, at least for me.

Its not a HS kid but it’s similar to a project of a HS kid, just with a more proven foundation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DocJJ said:

The ultimate risk/reward pick.   The range of outcomes is the entire spectrum from never sees the MLB to MLB superstar....

I'd be happy with a .250 avg 25 HR 60 steals with gold glove defense outcome!

I personally would have preferred Brecht.  I know the extreme risk with any pitcher, but arms like his don't grow on trees....

 

60 Steals? At what level?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scouting grades: Hit: 40 | Power: 60 | Run: 65 | Arm: 60 | Field: 70 | Overall: 50

Mlb.com scouting draft grades. Definitely has some elite tools. O's are trying hard to find Mullins replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record (not that anyone cares), I'm more in for this pick than the others so far. 

There's a significant risk profile, but also significant upside profile. That fits with the draft in a nutshell. Many will miss no matter the org, but I'd rather miss with guys that I think have a chance to be impact ML players if they do hit. This guy fits that profile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snap poll - by 2030 who has more CF plate appearances for the Orioles - EBJ or Honeycutt?

The 3 picks last night kind of fill in the entire 13 position player group for most of 2026-2027.

C Adley, 1B Basallo, 2B Holliday, SS Gunnar, 3B Westburg, LF Cowser, CF EBJ (platoon), RF Kjerstad, DH Mayo

Bench - OF4 Honeycutt, C Anderson, IF O'Ferrall, Mountcastle Arb3 2026?

Stowers, Beavers, Norby...we'll see July 30th.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Malike said:

As was stated earlier if he can bring his K rate down to ~25% he could be a star.

Are there any good examples of college draftees with lower career MLB K% than college K%? I’m guessing it’s pretty rare so I think 25% is a lot to ask.

That being said, if he is Kevin Kiermaier in CF, then he only needs ~80 wRC+ to be an average MLB player.  That’s certainly achievable with a K% between 26% and 36%.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Warehouse said:

Are there any good examples of college draftees with lower career MLB K% than college K%? I’m guessing it’s pretty rare so I think 25% is a lot to ask.

That being said, if he is Kevin Kiermaier in CF, then he only needs ~80 wRC+ to be an average MLB player.  That’s certainly achievable with a K% between 26% and 36%.

 

Saw someone make a Jose Siri comp.  I think that’s a good comp.   Siri has a career K rate of 34.7% but is a 2 WAR  player.   Hopefully, Honeycutt is a little more hitterish.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I probably missed it but has anyone said anything about his plate discipline?  He has swing and miss but are the swing decisions good or is he just some free swinger that occasionally makes great contact?


I think someone posted an analysis earlier in the thread that called him a guess hitter. I haven’t seen much about his plate discipline, mostly just analysis that he has pitch recognition issues in addition to holes in his swing.

Longenhagen: A swing change might remedy this but there are also breaking ball recognition issues here; Honeycutt had a 56% contact rate against sliders in 2024.

Law: His bigger issue is pitch and ball/strike recognition, as he swung and missed on nearly a third of the pitches he saw, including a 21 percent whiff rate on pitches in the zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Saw someone make a Jose Siri comp.  I think that’s a good comp.   Siri has a career K rate of 34.7% but is a 2 WAR  player.   Hopefully, Honeycutt is a little more hitterish.

 

Yes, I think that is what the front office is projecting for base case - Jose Siri/Drew Stubbs type player that’s worth 2 WAR per year given defense. With hope that the bat is more Brent Rooker/Miguel Sano/Joey Gallo/Nolan Gorman, but with a realistic outlook on ability to bring down the Ks.  That might not sound exciting, but for 22nd pick it’s good value.

Scouting/player dev potential also is likely to play a greater role in this type of pick, so hopefully they see some very specific improvement opportunities.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Warehouse said:

Yes, I think that is what the front office is projecting for base case - Jose Siri/Drew Stubbs type player that’s worth 2 WAR per year given defense. With hope that the bat is more Brent Rooker/Miguel Sano/Joey Gallo/Nolan Gorman, but with a realistic outlook on ability to bring down the Ks.  That might not sound exciting, but for 22nd pick it’s good value.

Scouting/player dev potential also is likely to play a greater role in this type of pick, so hopefully they see some very specific improvement opportunities.

 

For reference, below are Career stats since 2014 (min 300 PAs) for players K% at least 32%, plus NCAA K% in final year pre-draft.

Player

MLB K%

wRC+

NCAA K%*

Matt Wallner

34.9%

136

17.5%

Brent Rooker

32.5%

129

18.8%

Edouard Julien

32.2%

123

25.9%

Miguel Sano

36.5%

114

n/a

Ryan Schimpf

33.3%

114

15.3%

James Outman

32.7%

110

22.0%

Chris Carter

32.6%

110

n/a

Luke Raley

32.1%

110

5.7%

Juan Francisco

36.3%

108

n/a

Ryan Noda

33.9%

108

30.0%

Jarrett Parker

32.0%

108

19.2%

Nolan Gorman

33.9%

107

n/a

Joey Gallo

38.1%

107

n/a

Patrick Wisdom

36.7%

106

17.8%

Brandon Marsh

32.7%

106

n/a

Elly de la Cruz

32.3%

105

n/a

Oneil Cruz

33.2%

104

n/a

Keston Hiura

35.9%

103

14.6%

Tom Murphy

32.1%

103

17.7%

Edwin Rios

33.7%

100

13.6%

Will Benson

35.1%

99

n/a

Alex Avila

33.8%

98

19.6%

Tyler Austin

36.9%

96

n/a

Blake Sabol

33.0%

96

15.0%

Trayce Thompson

32.7%

96

n/a

Jose Siri

34.7%

95

n/a

Chris Davis

34.5%

95

n/a

Drew Stubbs

35.6%

94

20.8%

Kirk Nieuwenhuis

34.0%

94

n/a

Matt Davidson

34.8%

92

n/a

Bobby Dalbec

36.8%

90

30.7%

Daniel Palka

34.7%

90

21.4%

Drew Waters

32.8%

90

n/a

 

*final year pre-draft

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed on all points.  They're probably a matchup nightmare for just about anyone.
    • I hate that the Mets are somewhat respectable and that we've struggled against the NL this year.  This feels like the mother of all trap series...I don't like it. Jose Iglesias has entered the "he's still in the majors?" part of his career.    
    • Cleveland is my favorite. Their pen is great. They are #1 in DRS and #11 in OAA, so they can field. They put the ball in play and don’t strike out much at all. They have a few legit stars guys and a guy who is the most underrated super star in the sport in Ramirez.  
    • Just curious, why? I can see Cleveland because of their bullpen...and their staff overall, really.  
    • I doubt the 2025 Orioles will be able to out-opportunity the other 29 clubs but I've generally liked what I think was the 1st instance of "buy-side trading". He was meant to be an upper tier MLB starter at the time his present about to expire contract was struck but the big 4-year contract for a 30 year old coming off a career year didn't work out that great for the Mets.
    • I laughed when I saw that the other day and I don't believe it at all. There's no way anyone can convince me that losing Bradish and Means by themselves add up to less than 4.7 WAR.  Now, if they're saying that the players that have replaced Bradish and Means (and others) have offset the loss of WAR and you're left with a delta of 4.7, I can maybe...MAYBE buy that. I do think injuries will be the downfall of this team when we look back on everything, too many key guys gone for too many stretches of time.  Mateo struggles to hit often but he brings a dimension to this team, IMO, that is sorely missed.  Westburg has proven to be a great glue guy in his second season, he's missed as well.  Also, not having Bautista (which we knew headed into this season, but still) makes this bullpen different with his presence alone.  Bautista without Kimbrel and the addition of Seranthony...I like that back end of that bullpen, much more than what we have now. I'm rambling...but yeah, I think injuries are the biggest culprit.  After a couple seasons of getting lucky in that department, we haven't been able to dodge that bullet. I agree with @Sports Guy and others...I'm not so worried about how they are right now or how they've been over the last 50 games...it's what they'll be in six weeks from now that I'm most interested in.  Who's back, who's healthy, etc...a healthy Coulombe who's performing well...Westy, G-Rod...If they're healthy and performing well headed into October, I'm good with it.   As others have mentioned, the Rangers limped in and caught fire at the right time.  And this year, they're back to being average...or below average, really...they're 11 games under .500. As disappointing as this recent stretch has been, I'm just hoping they catch fire at the end of October like we know they can with some of the key guys back in the fold.  Unlike the Rangers last year who pushed all their chips to the middle and were hoping on veteran performances from Scherzer and DeGrom and Seager and Semien, we're thankfully not in that situation.  We're set up to compete for the foreseeable future and if they don't get it done this year, there still are chances ahead.
    • Also perhaps find interim housing.    I think on the 1983 champs celebration program airing intermittently on MASN Mike Boddicker told an anecdote it was only towards the end of the regular season Hank Peters told him he could let go of his Rochester apartment. I'd go AirBNB day to day if I was him - Tides just have a few home weeks left and I think he'll be back with the Orioles in September and on Opening Day 2025.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...