Jump to content

Who is going to end up the best career catcher? Wieters or Rutschmann.


Gurgi

Recommended Posts

Baring injury Adley gets more War.

Who do you want up to bat in a winner take all playoff game?

Who do you want behind the plate with a Rickey Henderson type on first base in a tie ballgame 9th inning?

I really bought into the switch hitting Jesus thing with Wieters.  This disappointment (perhaps misguided) led me to really not want to use a 1/1 draft pick on a catcher.   I am kind of wishing we went with Witt.  

I think I heard people saying the most important position on defense is catcher.  So how does it compare to SS or Centerfield.   Would you be better off using Rick Dempsey type all glove and arm with light bat or going all in on a 1/1 on a catcher?

If this has already been discussed tons dont yell at me I sometimes go months or weeks without posting.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Wieters had a career fWAR of 15.5.

Adley is at 14.3 in less than 3 seasons.

Its Adley…by a mile.

Of course.

I, like the rest of us have been trying to figure out what is the deal with Adley's struggles.

I agree that the injury angle is most likely but I can't see why, if you have a team with a strong chance of making the playoffs, why you wouldn't stick him on the IL for a couple of weeks to try and get him 100% for the playoffs rather than have him out there at 70% or whatever he's at.

All I can think of is that it's something that can be played through but will require surgery to actually fully recover from.  Maybe a hernia?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Of course.

I, like the rest of us have been trying to figure out what is the deal with Adley's struggles.

I agree that the injury angle is most likely but I can't see why, if you have a team with a strong chance of making the playoffs, why you wouldn't stick him on the IL for a couple of weeks to try and get him 100% for the playoffs rather than have him out there at 70% or whatever he's at.

All I can think of is that it's something that can be played through but will require surgery to actually fully recover from.  Maybe a hernia?

Dont know what it is, but theres something wrong with Adley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adley's first three years: .353 OBP, when the league average is about .315. 

Wieters' first three years: .328 OBP, when the league average was about .326. 

That's the biggest difference difference between them and why Adley will be better, even if it doesn't look like it for the last couple months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

Adley's first three years: .353 OBP, when the league average is about .315. 

Wieters' first three years: .328 OBP, when the league average was about .326. 

That's the biggest difference difference between them and why Adley will be better, even if it doesn't look like it for the last couple months. 

It was the difference his first two years. This year Adley has a .321 OBP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, waroriole said:

It was the difference his first two years. This year Adley has a .321 OBP. 

Still 9 points above league average.   

Bottom line, you have to decide if you think Adley’s second half is a slump or other result of an injury, or if this is the “new Adley.”  If the latter, there’s a decent case for Wieters.  If the former, then Adley is clearly the guy.   Personally, I believe the former.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Of course.

I, like the rest of us have been trying to figure out what is the deal with Adley's struggles.

I agree that the injury angle is most likely but I can't see why, if you have a team with a strong chance of making the playoffs, why you wouldn't stick him on the IL for a couple of weeks to try and get him 100% for the playoffs rather than have him out there at 70% or whatever he's at.

All I can think of is that it's something that can be played through but will require surgery to actually fully recover from.  Maybe a hernia?

 

Whatever seems to be possibly ailing Adley, IMO looks like it only affects him when hitting.  He sprang up outta his crouch like a Jack-in-the-Box and hustled for that foul pop/bunt yesterday and did not look like he was suffering any ill effects.

But what do I know?  🤔🤣

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Witchy_Chick said:

 

Whatever seems to be possibly ailing Adley, IMO looks like it only affects him when hitting.  He sprang up outta his crouch like a Jack-in-the-Box and hustled for that foul pop/bunt yesterday and did not look like he was suffering any ill effects.

But what do I know?  🤔🤣

 

I'd say that overall his defense has also been down this year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I'm not in the group that expected us to miss the playoffs a few days ago.  This thread was a bit silly at the time, and has now become completely irrelevant.  But stating we are going to win 5 of the next 9 games as a fact, is just as ignorant as the people who think we are going to lose out or continue the tailspin to the point that we will miss the playoffs.  As much as I can't stand constant negativity, I also can't stand people who have no tolerance for any negativity, or pessimism, or whatever you want to call it.  If you just want to be a part of a cheerleading group and resent any criticism of the team, a hardcore fan message board is probably not the place for you.  Not just speaking to this poster, but as a retort to similar opinions in general. 
    • Would the team be any better off with Skubal than they are now, considering the hitting woes?  I think that’s debatable, and questionable enough that I wouldn’t give up that high level talent to find out.    Who knows if the Tigers would have even done that?  They’ve made a nice run behind Skubal and the rest of their staff since the deadline. I think it’s a good chance they extend him to lead that young team into the next several years of what they hope are contending teams. Decent position player pool there. 
    • The Tigers are a fun story, reminiscent of the ‘22 birds a little bit (if that team had had a CY winner heading the rotation). But we need to end the dream for them this weekend. Take care of business versus Detroit and next weeks games will hardly matter. We can get our staff set up for the WC series after their next turn. That would be ideal. 
    • This is my thinking as well.  Who would have guessed that despite all the injuries, the Trevor Rogers fiasco and Corbin Burnes' terrible August that the most reliable part of this team would still be the starting pitching?  Eflin and Suarez have anchored a much better than expected rotation, with Kremer and Povich hanging in there despite some rough starts.  The current rotation has mostly kept us in games despite the absence of hitting and a head shaking bullpen.  Would we be better right now with Skubal?  Probably, but not by much with so much else wrong with this team.  Plus we kept our position player future that is clearly mostly still developing.   Perhaps we could still trade for Skubal this offseason, but with the Tigers suddenly Wild Card contenders I can't see them letting him go.  Maybe they'd trade him for a crazy package crazy like Adley, Holliday, Kjerstad and Povich.  I think that ship has sailed and maybe was never close to being a reality anyway.
    • I'm actually not concerned about his throwing arm, it's more about his hitting. There's definitely value in a super utility player like him who can play CF, SS, 2B, but his value was also the ability to hit lefties pretty well and speed.  I wouldn't mind bringing him back because presumably he'd start the season on the IL and wouldn't clog a roster spot.   
    • If you want to add all the extras the O's are still playing Davis and Cobb.
    • This is a good reminder that basically by design free agents are almost always "not worth their price". I think you've posted a number of analyses over the years demonstrating this. After looking at the available free agents and just how bleak the offensive upgrades are, I can see a path where Santander makes some sense. For example, signing Santander or someone like Alonso to play first base along with a trade of Mountcastle would increase the offensive potential of the team for the next couple of years, allow Kjerstad or other young players to take over RF, and ditching Mountcastle's salary would offset part of the cost of signing a free agent. The free agent contract is likely to stink in the final year or two, but that's the case for most of the possible (and realistic) upgrades. As we have seen in the second half, relying on the young players is also a risk. Basallo, Rutschman, Mayo or other internal options may occupy first in a couple of years. Just thinking out loud.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...