Jump to content

Olney: O's GM Candidates and Search Committee


VeveJones007

Recommended Posts

Per Olney:

Current list of Baltimore GM candidates: Thad Levine, Josh Byrnes, J.P. Ricciardi, Tony LaCava, Gerry Hunsicker, Dan Jennings, maybe more.

http://twitter.com/#!/Buster_ESPN/status/123864992981319680

Orioles are forming a group to conduct the GM interviews.

http://twitter.com/#!/Buster_ESPN/status/123865445324435456

Looks like a pretty good list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 393
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Fine lists, particularly if they bump Ricciardi and somehow (against all their self-imposed odds) manage to make "maybe more" into something other than "worst possible choice."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm extremely pleased by Buster Olney's tweet that the O's are forming a group to conduct GM interviews. Best news in sometime. Now, like Scott said, who will comprise that group? Will there be former players like Palmer, Cal, Eddie, and Brady? Former Execs like Gillick, Robinson, Hemond, B. Martinez? (Gillick and Hemond still advisors elsewhere) Contracted 3rd parties like Baseball Prospectus, FanGraphs, or Baltimore Native Dan Szymborski? (ESPN / Baseball Think Factory).

Probably Cohen, Snyder, Eisenberg, and Katzenberg. The people's choice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably Cohen, Snyder, Eisenberg, and Katzenberg. The people's choice!

As I'm sure most of us are aware, Angelos is the ONLY partner in his law firm because he trusts no one.

Do we really think anyone besides him and maybe a little input from Buck is going to pick the GM?

The "interview team" will probably be Dempsey, Orsulak, Posada, and Clancy. Not Tom Clancy, part owner, but Clancy: the beer vendor!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just speculating here, but it's obvious that Showalter has ambitions to move into a FO position, probably as GM, at some point in the future. His contract with the Orioles expires in two years, after the 2013 season. I find it interesting that the Orioles would expect that a quality, experienced GM would walk into a situation where its likely that the guy who had a say in your hiring will likely replace you after two years. That is, unless Angelos is preparing to reintroduce the two-headed monster in the FO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I'm sure most of us are aware, Angelos is the ONLY partner in his law firm because he trusts no one.

Do we really think anyone besides him and maybe a little input from Buck is going to pick the GM?

The "interview team" will probably be Dempsey, Orsulak, Posada, and Clancy. Not Tom Clancy, part owner, but Clancy: the beer vendor!

I mentioned Smouse because I thought he sat in on the Buck and Wedge interviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How pathetic that this committee is being formed now even though most observers, which should have included PGA and Showalter, understood that MacPhail was leaving in September or earlier. And shame on MacPhail for not making his intentions clear so the Orioles move forward sooner. You didn't want to stay so let Angelos know, okay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I'm sure most of us are aware, Angelos is the ONLY partner in his law firm because he trusts no one.

Do we really think anyone besides him and maybe a little input from Buck is going to pick the GM?

The "interview team" will probably be Dempsey, Orsulak, Posada, and Clancy. Not Tom Clancy, part owner, but Clancy: the beer vendor!

Personally...I think Clancy the beer vendor should make all decisions in the FO. Hell...he should be the GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good list, with the glaring exception of Ricciardi. He's by far the worst candidate, and I have a really bad feeling he'll wind up with the job because he has GM experience, and experience in the AL East at that. This is the same feeling I got when I heard the Orioles were looking into Kevin Gregg last offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good list, with the glaring exception of Ricciardi. He's by far the worst candidate, and I have a really bad feeling he'll wind up with the job because he has GM experience, and experience in the AL East at that. This is the same feeling I got when I heard the Orioles were looking into Kevin Gregg last offseason.

Yeah I read it and was like...one of these things is not like the other....I don't get why he's even on the list, he seems to be opposite the tendencies the other guys all have. Pretty much anyone else on that list I'm A-OK with, although Levine, Byrnes and Lacava would lead the pack for me personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Generous? You are aware that multiple players have hit the 10M mark as an Arb 1 right?  
    • Its a low risk scenario, so we may grab someone to get a look at them in spring training, but I don't expect the Orioles to keep anyone on the roster. There just isn't space.  The bullpen may have a spot or two open, but several arms are lacking options and a Rule-5 guy wouldn't be able to be sent down. Elias (and most teams) like to have at least a spot or two that can be used to shuttle guys up and down in case of overwork. I don't see a guy worth taking a spot like that on a team that just won 101 games. 
    • Why not try and snag an arm in the rule 5?  Not glamorous enough?  What relievers are drafted/signed and turned to relievers before AA/AAA ball?  Ben Joyce?  So everyone is a failed SP. Either because of injury or performance. So why not take a flier on an arm when upper level pitching depth is a weakness of our org? We might never guess the player, but I think we can see that RH P is a need for us at the top of the system. The Yankees have a nasty bullpen. If they’ve been delaying converting a SP to a reliever then we should be all over that. That’s not being poor. That’s being smart, but we are poor. 
    • That’s a lot cheaper than the alternatives.  Matz has kind of been up and down and has never been an innings eater.   He finished real strong his last six starts but a lat strain ended his season.  In some ways he has Oriole written all over him.   The fact that he’s 32 and his career high in IP is 160 makes me question if he really is their kind of guy.
    • If the team decided that Wells had just reached his innings limit and we just shut him down last year then I think the opinion of Wells’ 2023 season as a SP would be much different.  We need a SP and a high leverage reliever for next year. What role is Wells in 2023?  What’s best for Wells and the team long term?  Is this decision going to be about Wells, or more based on what FA takes our offer?  Whether that be a reliever or SP. People just write off Wells as a #5, but at the ASB you could make an argument for Wells, or Bradish, as who was our best SP. Wells was leading the AL in WHIP. Wells showed last year that he can be at least a #3 type of SP. Everyone has known since we took him in the Rule 5 draft that it was going to take some time to build him up to even 150-160 IP. Ok, so big deal… that didn’t happen in year two, and his first year starting full time. I don’t think the org just gives up on him as a SP like a lot have. I think he could be an All Star Closer. He would be our 3rd closer in a row to do that. That’s a very valuable role for us. But give me the SP that only gave up more than 3 ER three times in his first 18 starts. 
    • Matz is owed 2yr/$25 million. There’s no way that we’re paying that let alone trading for it. Trading isn’t a bad idea and I think it’s on the table for us if need be. 
    • Mathematically this makes no sense. Holiday is under team controls for at least 6 years and probably more because he hasn't played a single At Bat in the Majors yet.  So if you get 3 years of league minimum vs the $10M AAV, that's $27,840,000 MORE we are paying him in those 3 years. Let's add another $5M (assuming a $5M salary) in year4 / Arb1. Then another $3M (assuming a $7M salary) in year 5 Arb2.  Then let's assume he hits payday and gets $15M arbitration bucks in year 6. Subtract $5. Assuming the next 2 years would be free agent money of $25 per, we can Subtract $30M.   I was being generous with the arbitration guesses. And even then, the net result is that you're paying nearly an extra million dollars that you didn't have to, assuming all goes according to plan and he can play out the length of entire contract healthy. And assuming he's good. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...