Jump to content

If we were fortunate enough to make the World Series, how would you feel about playing the Nats?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Not sure how they are honing in it.

They have had more success in the last three seasons, than the Birds have.

Short of the fact that they won a division title in 2012 compared to the O's WC, the two teams have actually had nearly identical three-year stretches.

2012: Playoff appearance, first-round knockout.

2013: Winning record (Nats 86 wins; O's 85), no playoffs.

2014: They clinch their respective divisions on the same darn day.

All told, kinda kooky, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Not likely, as season ticket holders will snap up virtually all the WS tickets.

True in principle.

However, Washington being Washington, you have a lot of season ticket holders who might be of the corporate, transient nature and bought those tickets not as much for the love of the Nationals but instead because it's a good place to schmooze. So the intensity of the fanbase isn't quite as strong as it might otherwise be.

And while going to a World Series might be neat, if those season ticket holders aren't so invested in Nationals and you have Orioles fans willing to pay crazy money to buy those seats off them for the Series, you might see a substantial amount of orange and black in the stands yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Short of the fact that they won a division title in 2012 compared to the O's WC, the two teams have actually had nearly identical three-year stretches.

2012: Playoff appearance, first-round knockout.

2013: Winning record (Nats 86 wins; O's 85), no playoffs.

2014: They clinch their respective divisions on the same darn day.

All told, kinda kooky, really.

And besides Washington's .500 season in 2005, the teams have had an almost parallel existence since the Nationals began. Neither team did much of anything until 2012. And both teams have had the exact same number of on the field victory celebrations. While they celebrated clinching the division in 2012, we got to celebrate winning the wild card game. And then both teams took it to five games in the division series before exiting.

The only difference being, the Orioles came out with their heads high in a moral (albeit not actual) victory after the ALDS, where the Nationals NLDS was a heartbreaking devastating loss (they were within a strike of advancing to the NLCS and blew it). So arguably Orioles fans had it better in 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C'mon guys O's Nat's would just be a lot of fun! Plus the spotlight on the O's would be bigger than any other opponent due to the great story line of the Beltway Series.

and in regards to the name I think everyone just needs to accept that it would be called a beltway series even though of course there are two beltways not one.

I think its better as well because "the beltway" is a common experience to those who live all over Baltimore-Washington. I understand that the Parkway connects the two cities but unless you live directly between the two cities your not on that road much. Coming from Annapolis I have much more experience with both Beltways than I do the Parkway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Post has been having fun with this. Also had a front page article on Tuesday about a Nats-O's series.

The possibilities are endless. ?Beltway Series is probably the most popular choice, especially among non-critical thinkers who blithely ingest the mindless sludge fed to them by major national sports networks. The reason this doesnt work is because there are two Beltways, and they dont have much to do with each other, and so Beltways Series would make more sense, but that sounds stupid.

(I mean, Houston has a Beltway. Would an Astros-Nats series be a Beltway Series? Why not just call it a City Series? A Municipality Series? A Series Between Two Baseball Teams.)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-sports-bog/wp/2014/09/17/should-a-nats-orioles-world-series-be-the-beltway-series-the-parkway-series-or-something-else/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/washington-nationals-baltimore-orioles-on-cusp-of-clinching-spots-in-mlb-playoffs/2014/09/15/4d9ae814-3aa5-11e4-bdfb-de4104544a37_story.html

There's really no need to be so passive-aggressive, pedantic and literal about it. The Baltimore Beltway and the Washington Beltway are connected by both 95 and 295. In no traffic, you can go from being on one beltway to the other in about 20-25 minutes (around 22 miles from the southwest side of 695 to the northeast side of 495).

Your comparison to Houston is ridiculous. The distance between the Baltimore beltway and the Houston beltway an order of magnitude higher (or possibly two orders of magnitude, I haven't done the calculations). Baltimore and Washington are adjacent cities because there are no other cities nearly as large as them in between them. Annapolis is off to the southeast, but it's tiny in comparison. Adjacent cities tend to have overlapping fanbases, and that's exactly what we have today. There's minimal to no overlap in fanbase between the Houston metro area and the Baltimore metro area.

To suggest that people who call it the Beltway Series are "non-critical thinkers" and that "[the two beltways] dont have much to do with each other [sic]" is ridiculous. I know people who live closer to Nats Stadium than OPACY who root for the O's, and I know people who live north of Baltimore who root for the Nats. The entire Baltimore-Washington metro area is peppered with a diffuse set of people who root for either the Nats, the O's, both, or neither. There may be some correlations of distance to OPACY and fandom, but once you get more than 5 miles out of the city, I'd expect the correlations to fall into the noise.

And all of this is in a really small geographical area, in the era of cars that can get 30 - 40 mpg. I know people who commute to work in West Baltimore coming from Virginia or even Pennsylvania every day. I occasionally commute from West Baltimore to another work site in Alexandria, which is right outside DC, and I barely bat an eyelash at the commute time. These cities are nearby. It's a Beltway Series! There's really no other way to put it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Short of the fact that they won a division title in 2012 compared to the O's WC, the two teams have actually had nearly identical three-year stretches.

2012: Playoff appearance, first-round knockout.

2013: Winning record (Nats 86 wins; O's 85), no playoffs.

2014: They clinch their respective divisions on the same darn day.

All told, kinda kooky, really.

Yes very kooky and thanks for the research, and my memory is wrong. I will admit it. However, I still do not believe they are honing in. Of course, just IMO.

How can you possibly think that? Not that I agree with the post you responded to either.

Geeze, I had a brain fart, it happens. When you get old, your memory fails at time. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have FP' date=' 97 mph heater from Kershaw or 3 hours of FP on the mic, both very hazardous when not ready for it.[/quote']

how does he still have a job by the way? every time i hear that guy, I seriously wanna vomit. NO CLUE how even the nats fans can possibly tolerate him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True in principle.

However, Washington being Washington, you have a lot of season ticket holders who might be of the corporate, transient nature and bought those tickets not as much for the love of the Nationals but instead because it's a good place to schmooze. So the intensity of the fanbase isn't quite as strong as it might otherwise be.

And while going to a World Series might be neat, if those season ticket holders aren't so invested in Nationals and you have Orioles fans willing to pay crazy money to buy those seats off them for the Series, you might see a substantial amount of orange and black in the stands yet.

I expect to see some orange and black, I just don't expect it to be anything like those regular season games. I hope we get the chance to find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's really no need to be so passive-aggressive, pedantic and literal about it. The Baltimore Beltway and the Washington Beltway are connected by both 95 and 295. In no traffic, you can go from being on one beltway to the other in about 20-25 minutes (around 22 miles from the southwest side of 695 to the northeast side of 495).

Your comparison to Houston is ridiculous. The distance between the Baltimore beltway and the Houston beltway an order of magnitude higher (or possibly two orders of magnitude, I haven't done the calculations). Baltimore and Washington are adjacent cities because there are no other cities nearly as large as them in between them. Annapolis is off to the southeast, but it's tiny in comparison. Adjacent cities tend to have overlapping fanbases, and that's exactly what we have today. There's minimal to no overlap in fanbase between the Houston metro area and the Baltimore metro area.

To suggest that people who call it the Beltway Series are "non-critical thinkers" and that "[the two beltways] dont have much to do with each other [sic]" is ridiculous. I know people who live closer to Nats Stadium than OPACY who root for the O's, and I know people who live north of Baltimore who root for the Nats. The entire Baltimore-Washington metro area is peppered with a diffuse set of people who root for either the Nats, the O's, both, or neither. There may be some correlations of distance to OPACY and fandom, but once you get more than 5 miles out of the city, I'd expect the correlations to fall into the noise.

And all of this is in a really small geographical area, in the era of cars that can get 30 - 40 mpg. I know people who commute to work in West Baltimore coming from Virginia or even Pennsylvania every day. I occasionally commute from West Baltimore to another work site in Alexandria, which is right outside DC, and I barely bat an eyelash at the commute time. These cities are nearby. It's a Beltway Series! There's really no other way to put it.

You do know he was quoting an article and they weren't his own words right? Unless he wrote the article, and then I guess your reply would be fine.

Sent from my LG-D851 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 of the 10 playoff teams could be regional rivalries

BAL-WAS

LAA-LAD

SFG-OAK

Surprisingly, media darling Oakland could fall off the list. Since the media canonized Billy Beane at the July trade deadline, his team is 17-27, losing 13.5 games in the standings to the Angels.

Too bad, so sad NYY-NYM, CHW-CHC no soup for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • The pitchers are adjusting to him, now he’s going to need to adjust back.  I still don’t know what level of hitter he’ll be when he finally settles in at his level.   I do know that the depths Mateo reached last year are exceedingly rare.  
    • We are the better team with the much better trade chips/minor league pieces. Any move they can make we can counter and then some!
    • The walking part is true, though I was a little surprised to see how much worse Cowser's K and BB rates both are compared to last year. 2023 he ran a 22:13 K:BB, this year it's 33:9.  Obviously this year's overall results are better. But it seems like he's still calibrating the aggression meter to MLB pitching and the current iteration has led to crushing the baseball (he's at 99th percentile barrel percentage), but a ton of K's and less BBs. Hopefully he can find a happy medium, similar to how Gunnar evolved away from being too patient at the beginning of last year. 
    • First of all, this comp makes no sense. Mateo had a history of not being that good. His ML stats weren’t good and his MiL stats were very underwhelming. Meanwhile, Cowser was a talented, top 5 pick out of college who put up huge MiL numbers.    Im not surprised Cowser is struggling some. He’s playing everyday and playing vs all lefties. In a perfect world, he would be sitting a few times a week right now but the injury to Hays has hurt that. That said, he has had some bad calls against him and is still doing something positive every game. Despite the garbage throw yesterday, he has a highly rated arm and is playing very good defense overall.  I do wonder if he hurt his knee yesterday though. That will be something to watch. But yea, I don’t see this as a comp worth mentioning. Just far too many differences between the 2 players.
    • Urias off the team, probably. Or an injury. Given how much they value Urias' glove, I suspect he'd have to be terrible at the plate all the way through the All-Star break before they'd consider that kind of move.
    • I'd trade him for Bryce Miller before I traded him for Mason Miller.  That not a knock on Mason either but I will take a good young starter over a great young reliever any day.  
    • @RZNJ’s Liranzo thread reminded me that the FCL season starts tomorrow!  Have we heard what the roster will be?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...