Jump to content

2015 Orioles, Lowered Expectations edition. Let's finish above .500!


PeteU

Recommended Posts

Our efforts to retain players or acquire players through free agency will be hurt if we finish poorly. I'm against that. I'd much prefer a fourth consecutive winning season to build on.

Agree completely. Of course I'm disappointed with the slide in August, but I actually think it's quite important to finish above .500. Do you guys remember WHILE we were in that 1998-2011 nightmare (obviously we couldn't have known it would end in 2012), I thought - given the Yankees/Red Sox money and our poor farm system and lack of international scouting - that the consecutive losing season streak would NEVER end....I'm sure I'm not the only one.

We could all be here right now cursing and complaining about an 18th straight losing year. I just don't take WINNING baseball (even slightly above .500 winning baseball) for granted anymore.

And as a few have said, draft position is not that important given what a crapshoot it is in baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree completely. Of course I'm disappointed with the slide in August, but I actually think it's quite important to finish above .500. Do you guys remember WHILE we were in that 1998-2011 nightmare (obviously we couldn't have known it would end in 2012), I thought - given the Yankees/Red Sox money and our poor farm system and lack of international scouting - that the consecutive losing season streak would NEVER end....I'm sure I'm not the only one.

We could all be here right now cursing and complaining about an 18th straight losing year. I just don't take WINNING baseball (even slightly above .500 winning baseball) for granted anymore.

And as a few have said, draft position is not that important given what a crapshoot it is in baseball.

I do think the difference between finishing in the bottom 10 (where your first draft pick is protected even if you sign a free agent who had receive a QO) and finishing outside the bottom 10 is fairly significant. But the bottom 10 teams are likely to finish with 76 wins or fewer. We'd have to finish 6-12 to be that bad, and I have no desire to go there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think the difference between finishing in the bottom 10 (where your first draft pick is protected even if you sign a free agent who had receive a QO) and finishing outside the bottom 10 is fairly significant. But the bottom 10 teams are likely to finish with 76 wins or fewer. We'd have to finish 6-12 to be that bad, and I have no desire to go there.

I didn't know this....Good observation from you (as usual)...thanks Frobby...but yeah, let's win as many games as we can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

2015 Orioles, Lowered Low expectations edition. Let's finish at .500.

Then, whenever anyone asks if it was a relatively good year or a relatively bad year, we can all shrug and say, "I dunno."

Have the Orioles ever finished the season at an even .500?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • 1) I don't think it's a bad idea to consider moving on from non-productive vets like Hays and possibly Mullins as well. 2) I'm almost starting to move toward the opinion of re-signing Santander. He is likely not to require a major financial commitment (3/4 years at modest money). And I believe because most of his contributions come from counting stats (homers and RBIs) he is likely to be undervalued in this era of statcast baseball. 3) Elias has never (IMO for good reason) decided to take the approach of multiple/several first timers learning on the job at all at once. The potential for that to go sideways represents too much risk, when you are trying to win a World Series. 4) You didn't just mention moving on from Mullins and Hays. But you also mentioned Santander, O'Hearn, and Mountcastle. That is FIVE regulars and replacing them all with players who have never proven that they can hit Major League pitching. I would almost bet that there aren't 5 first timers in all of MLB who are succeeding this season on their first try. Now obviously, for Holliday next season will be his second try. And I guess 3rd for Stowers, maybe 4th depending how you look at it. And second/third for Kjerstad, Norby (I guess second). Though some of these guys stints were so short, I don't know if they could even get/make much of it some of those previous times. 5) If we make it to the postseason (which we are almost assured to do) win or lose this year in the Fall, it will be a very poor message to send to the fanbase to not spend/add in the offseason. With a payroll this low (ranked what 25th?) you should not be cutting cost and especially with a multi-billionaire owner. 6) If you don't trade any of these players this season, how do you propose that we get better/get the piece(s) that we need? 7) Even with all of these new young players and even if all of them performed right away, where is the pitching going to come from next season in order to legitimately contend (if you don't spend in the offseason)?
    • Nobody thought Toronto would not cash in on their "window". It slammed shut on them and they had a lot of young talent that regressed pretty hard. Cautionary tales are out there.
    • What an odd question. Of course it’s important. The entire baseball world will be paying attention to this series. The two best teams in all baseball, in the same division, each going for a crown at the expense of the other, and neither a big fan of the other. Wins are important regardless of the opponent, but it also goes without saying that we would rather win three out of four against the Yankees, than three out of four against the Athletics, or even other contenders like the Mariners or Guards.  
    • Yeah, too much young talent for that to happen next year, unless some major regression and injuries happen.
    • Mike Elias' job certainly entails doing due diligence on Jack Flaherty again.  
    • even if they do, so what? 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...