Jump to content

Making room for another FA outfielder


SurhoffFTW

Recommended Posts

Assuming (for now) the base lineup includes Kim/Smith in OF and Trumbo DH, and that Joseph and Flaherty are penciled in, who are your other two bench players?

Rickard, Mancini, Rule 5 OFs, and Free agents to choose from.

You can still add someone like Pagan, and I'd support that, but it almost assuredly sends Rickard to AAA. Which I doubt Buck wants to do.

Mancini seems destined for AAA given Trumbo news.

If one of the Rule 5s shows anything, I bet Buck keeps that player & either Rickard/FA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Kim/Rickard in LF

Smith/Trumbo in RF

Trumbo at DH against RHP's.

I see Joseph, Flaherty, Rickard,  and Santander or someone to hold a spot until Santander is ready.     I think the O's figure a way to carry this kid.

wow, that is a strong bench! Hard to choose which pinch hitter to use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we didn't have to keep Tavarez on the roster we could add another outfielder.  I'm all in favor of this.  I don't agree with sacrificing the Major League team to keep a Rule V player.  Teams with playoff aspirations should not be doing this.  

Rickard is going to make the team IMO and should.  Some have suggested he could start in Triple A but we need a right handed bat who can play against lefties when Smith and likely Kim will need to sit.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ChuckS said:

If we didn't have to keep Tavarez on the roster we could add another outfielder.  I'm all in favor of this.  I don't agree with sacrificing the Major League team to keep a Rule V player.  Teams with playoff aspirations should not be doing this.  

Rickard is going to make the team IMO and should.  Some have suggested he could start in Triple A but we need a right handed bat who can play against lefties when Smith and likely Kim will need to sit.  

But rule V guys are magic.

And they show how much smarter Buck and Dan are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could certainly see the O's keeping a Rule 5 player on the roster long enough for him to remain in the organization. They've done that every season since Duquesne came onboard, with the exception of Michael Almanzar, who they ended up trading for anyway.

Now that Rickard has passed the test and remained with the team, I could easily see him being a roster casualty if needed. He started hot, faded a bit and then got injured, but being right-handed helps his cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It continues to look as though we missed out on a pretty ideal fit in Rajai Davis. 

As the OP mentions, I'd love to see them sign Pagan, be okay with the fact that one of Pagan/Kim/Smith will sit each day, leave Rickard in AAA for insurance, and forget about the Rule V guys for once. But I doubt that's the plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spy Fox said:

It continues to look as though we missed out on a pretty ideal fit in Rajai Davis. 

As the OP mentions, I'd love to see them sign Pagan, be okay with the fact that one of Pagan/Kim/Smith will sit each day, leave Rickard in AAA for insurance, and forget about the Rule V guys for once. But I doubt that's the plan.

I doubt it's the plan either. I'd send Rickard down for Pagan and have him work on hitting RHP. Pagan would be a god send here IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MDtransplant757 said:

I doubt it's the plan either. I'd send Rickard down for Pagan and have him work on hitting RHP. Pagan would be a god send here IMO

Is it Pagan's advanced age, his bad defense, his weak hitting, or his inability to stay healthy and on the field for a full season that attracts you the most?  Please look at his numbers and history.  It has been four years since Pagan was a valuable player.  He once was a good defensive player, but his last year of good defense was 2010.  I also don't think he would come cheap, either.  He's made $10 or 11 million each of the last three years.  He wouldn't play over Trumbo, Smith, or Kim vs. RHP, and he can't hit LHP very well at all.  How does he fit our team?  I think we are seriously overrating Pagan on this board.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/p/paganan01.shtml

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Number5 said:

Is it Pagan's advanced age, his bad defense, his weak hitting, or his inability to stay healthy and on the field for a full season that attracts you the most?  Please look at his numbers and history.  It has been four years since Pagan was a valuable player.  He once was a good defensive player, but his last year of good defense was 2010.  I also don't think he would come cheap, either.  He's made $10 or 11 million each of the last three years.  He wouldn't play over Trumbo, Smith, or Kim vs. RHP, and he can't hit LHP very well at all.  How does he fit our team?  I think we are seriously overrating Pagan on this board.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/p/paganan01.shtml

 

According to total zone he had good years in 2012 and 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

According to total zone he had good years in 2012 and 2014.

Not really.  Not terrible, like 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2016, but not good.  I can't see any reason we should be thinking about signing Pagan at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

How is 16 rTOT and 15 rTOT/yr in and 7 rTOT and 10 rTOT/yr in 2014  2012 not good? Last year Manny was 6 rTOT and 7 rTOT He must be a mediocre 3B.

Negative defensive runs saved and negative dWAR in all of the years 2011 thru 2016.  The two years you mentioned were the least terrible, but still below average.  Are you really still arguing that Pagan has been a good fielder the past six years?  Are you really still thinking, after reviewing his numbers, that this is a guy you want to shell out money for?  Who do you plan on sitting in order to play him?  The singular thing we most need right now in our lineup is someone that hits LHP well to play when Smith doesn't.  Pagan has been very weak vs. LHP.  His salary history indicates he ain't coming cheap.  Way too much for the short side of a platoon, even if for some odd reason we to decide that he will completely change and learn to hit LHP well.  He certainly doesn't hit RHP better than Smith, Kim, or Trumbo, so his better side brings no value, as he would definitely sit vs. RHP.  Why do you want Pagan?  What does he bring to the table?  I'm not seeing any benefit at all.  Please explain why we should sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Number5 said:

Negative defensive runs saved and negative dWAR in all of the years 2011 thru 2016.  The two years you mentioned were the least terrible, but still below average.  Are you really still arguing that Pagan has been a good fielder the past six years?  Are you really still thinking, after reviewing his numbers, that this is a guy you want to shell out money for?  Who do you plan on sitting in order to play him?  The singular thing we most need right now in our lineup is someone that hits LHP well to play when Smith doesn't.  Pagan has been very weak vs. LHP.  His salary history indicates he ain't coming cheap.  Way too much for the short side of a platoon, even if for some odd reason we to decide that he will completely change and learn to hit LHP well.  He certainly doesn't hit RHP better than Smith, Kim, or Trumbo, so his better side brings no value, as he would definitely sit vs. RHP.  Why do you want Pagan?  What does he bring to the table?  I'm not seeing any benefit at all.  Please explain why we should sign him.

Not arguing anything. Just pointing out that according to Total Zone he was good those two years. Defensive metrics cam be voodoo statistics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Kim/Rickard in LF

Smith/Trumbo in RF

Trumbo at DH against RHP's.

I see Joseph, Flaherty, Rickard,  and Santander or someone to hold a spot until Santander is ready.     I think the O's figure a way to carry this kid.

My guess like others is that Aneury Tavarez will get that opportunity.

I'll be interested to hear the reports on him from Spring Training.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Yep. The roster is kind of a hot mess right now. It's very awkwardly put together and when our veterans aren't performing, it really shows the flaws of the rest of the roster.  There's just an awkward vibe about how they are going about things this year, despite the overall good record. It's tough to put a finger on. The offensive approach has taken a pretty wild step back. I can't imagine they are preaching anything different than last year, especially when it's not working. It's up to the players, ultimately. If I'm Hyde I would be having a closed door meeting and having some frank discussions. If nothing else just to try and shake them up mentally.  Losing to Lynn and Gibson is basically unacceptable with the offensive potential this team has. 
    • It’s always a compliment when your DFA’d players get claimed/traded for. Nevin, McKenna, Ramirez, Baumann. Except for that Tony Kemp dude. SMH
    • Great/informative read. I use to say, "For ten cents and a cup of coffee, I could find 100 people to tell me what is wrong." Hard part is finding someone to tell you how to fix it. Do we just have patience and hope it fixes itself or do we hope the Orioles make major changes now? Earlier post stated emphatically we WOULD make the playoffs. Can I still count on that? This offensive funk has been going on a while now let alone a bullpen problem. Talk me off the ledge. 
    • The Mets and the Mariners do love themselves Orioles pitching.
    • Mullins should be sent down or if he’s hurt and trying to play through it, he should be on the IL. Santander, who hasn’t been good most of the year, is 1-11 since banging his knee. Putting him in the field yesterday may give us a thought they think he’s improving.  Let’s see how he feels today. Putting him on the IL and being able to send him on a short rehab may be a good thing. Hays is what he is right now.  He was looking good as soon as he got back but that seems to have been short lived. Right now, the team isn’t treating him like the superstar Pickles thinks he is, so that’s good.  With Mayo out and Holliday still working on things, that leaves Kjerstad and Norby. I know the adjustment period is rough for this minor leaguers right now and June is going to be a b!tch of a schedule but I would like to see at least HK back up and I want to see Stowers playing more often. Things can’t really get any worse, so let’s use these guys. Shane Mayo got hurt…maybe he would be up.
    • I live in LA and have heard and seen a lot of things from Trevor Bauer that would give me the creeps if we ever even considered signing him. Stong pass.
    • The talk about Kramer just doesn't make sense to me.  Does he have the occasional klunker, yes.  He is slotted though as a #4 or 5 pitcher in a rotation putting up pretty good stats along the way.  No team has 5 studs and truthfully I would love for someone to find 5 #5's on MLB pitching staffs that would be a consensus better option than Kremer.  He shows up every 5th day, keep you in games and eats innings.  It wasn't that long ago that a Kremer type would be looked at as an ace of an Orioles rotation. To your point of course I would love to have 5 Burnes types to go into the playoffs so that way you have an ace ready to go in a must win game.  That really isn't realistic though.  Kremer is solid for the role we need him for and truthfully we have way more concerns on our roster than him.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...