Jump to content

Hardy Already Dealing With Sore Back


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don't think the WBC will hurt our readiness for the season.    There's plenty of time.    I just read an article saying that spring training is way longer than the position players need in order to get ready, and is really just for the benefit of the pitchers getting stretched out gradually.  

However, I guess I'll be seeing a lot of minor leaguers when I'm in Sarasota on March 11-18.    

Good for you, enjoy Florida, as OFFNY would say, you BASTARD!

I was supposed to be down there, this spring, but my traveling partner (Son) had a work commitment and couldn't swap it off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

Which is why, if I was Buck, Davis stays firmly on first for a majority of the games.

In the hypothetical "Hardy goes down for an extended period" scenario, I'd certainly entertain the idea of Davis at third and Trumbo at first. Trumbo isn't a bad glove over there, at all. And though they're fine in short spells, I'd want to do anything in my power to keep Ryan Flaherty, Chris Johnson or Juan Francisco from being regular additions to the lineup.

Francisco has pretty firm splits. So you could platoon him at DH with Mancini in this hypothetical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

In the hypothetical "Hardy goes down for an extended period" scenario, I'd certainly entertain the idea of Davis at third and Trumbo at first. Trumbo isn't a bad glove over there, at all. And though they're fine in short spells, I'd want to do anything in my power to keep Ryan Flaherty, Chris Johnson or Juan Francisco from being regular additions to the lineup.

Francisco has pretty firm splits. So you could platoon him at DH with Mancini in this hypothetical.

That also has the reverse effect on our DH production then. You going to give Mancini all Trumbo's DH ABs?

 

e: I see you said about a Mancini platoon. I'd still rather have Flash at 3B. We know he's damn solid there. Any RBI is gravy. Leave the GG finalist at 1B and Trumbo hitting hitting hitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we'd get a huge offensive boost having trumbo Mancini and Davis all in the lineup.

 

Sure, the defense would take a sharp hit with Davis taking over third and trumbo taking over 1st but would the extra offense from Mancini and trumbo playing offset flash or Janish?

 

Is Davis really that bad at third? He's a pretty athletic big guy, I can't imagine the difference between flash and Davis defensively is more significant than Mancini and flash offensively but I guess that's a possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Norfolk orioles said:

So we'd get a huge offensive boost having trumbo Mancini and Davis all in the lineup.

 

Sure, the defense would take a sharp hit with Davis taking over third and trumbo taking over 1st but would the extra offense from Mancini and trumbo playing offset flash or Janish?

 

Is Davis really that bad at third? He's a pretty athletic big guy, I can't imagine the difference between flash and Davis defensively is more significant than Mancini and flash offensively but I guess that's a possibility.

First I'll say that Davis isn't bad at third. He's big and good reflexes, great arm. I'm just not ready to anoint Mancini yet like a lot of folks are. He had a great September callup. What have you done for me lately?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Norfolk orioles said:

So we'd get a huge offensive boost having trumbo Mancini and Davis all in the lineup.

 

Sure, the defense would take a sharp hit with Davis taking over third and trumbo taking over 1st but would the extra offense from Mancini and trumbo playing offset flash or Janish?

 

Is Davis really that bad at third? He's a pretty athletic big guy, I can't imagine the difference between flash and Davis defensively is more significant than Mancini and flash offensively but I guess that's a possibility.

If Davis was competent at third the O's would not have needed to call up a 19 year old to play third base in 2012.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, scOtt said:

That also has the reverse effect on our DH production then. You going to give Mancini all Trumbo's DH ABs?

 

e: I see you said about a Mancini platoon. I'd still rather have Flash at 3B. We know he's damn solid there. Any RBI is gravy. Leave the GG finalist at 1B and Trumbo hitting hitting hitting.

Fair. I'm just tired of watching Ryan Flaherty fail at the plate. He brings no value offensively, and I like offensive value out of the corners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I wonder how people would feel if Eflin’s ERA this season started with a 3 - like every single more predictive measure (3.37 xERA, 3.65 FIP, 3.77 xFIP, 3.92 SIERA) - instead of being a ghastly 4.09.  For those hoping for somebody better - who exactly do you think is better who is potentially available other than Skubal and Crochet? Fedde has been better this year, but last year he was in Korea and Eflin had a 4.7 fWAR season with a 3.50 ERA. I’d still take Eflin over him going forward, even if it’s close. More importantly, he’s also owed only $7.5M next year to Eflin’s $18M, so the trade price will be MUCH higher and every single team looking for pitching can afford him next year and is competing for him. Taking Eflin’s salary lowered the competition and the prospect capital and is EXACTLY the type of deal the Orioles should be doing with their payroll flexibility. Snell was horrible this year, then hurt, and now maybe himself again. Even if you think he’s good going forward now, he’s a rental with the anchor of a potential $31M salary next year if he gets injured or starts struggling again.  Bassitt is good, but by all predictive measures other than ERA still worse than Eflin this year, but he’s 35 and owed even more next year ($21M). And the reports are he’s not even available.  Taillon is fine, but not better than Eflin - everything in his profile is pointing to a 4+ ERA much more than Eflin. Rangers are not trading Eovaldi or Scherzer now. Luzardo maybe, but he’s hurt and MIA may not be trading him either.  Am I missing anybody? I’d love to add any of these guys too and don’t think the Orioles should stop here. But Eflin was arguably the best available, and definitely the best fit in terms of the balance of prospect capital vs. taking on salary. To boot they also added added to a rotation next year that right now only has Grayson and Kremer.  I can understand wanting a more impressive high K, ace SP type in theory, but with all of this context I don’t know how you could think anything other than loving this deal. 
    • Which indicates that this is currently not a good team.  Question marks everywhere. If your not playing and not happy about it, make the most of the chances when you get them.
    • i agree with what those who are saying the vets might be a little miffed with uncertain contract futures looming.  But the reality is the young guys are going to be auditioned adequately before summarily being brought up just to take their "rightful" places now filled by vets. I don't have any problem with how Elias is handling talent either in the farm or on the MLB team.  And after reflecting a while on a position I had about trading long-term O's during a Playoff/WS run - basically, that Elias would show some deference to guys that got us here - I've flopped on that.  What I think is happening is that the audition process is concluding in some ways.  Had Hays come out like an All-Star again this year, I still think he would have/ could have been traded, but for maybe a higher net.  Cowser and Kierstadt have, by now, proven themselves - so to speak, and having control of them, makes them more valuable, particularly since both were outperforming Hays.  I think Mullins could be next.  To me, it was basically a "prove it" year for anyone competing for OF positions.  My biggest question is do they amp up the "try outs" for 2nd and 3rd base now.
    • What I was saying yesterday is without Burnes, he moved into that spot at the top of the rotation for the team as currently constructed. I’m not saying next year he will be a CY candidate, although he has great stuff and has the potential to do so if he can put it all together. 
    • Actually it's clear to me that there is no reporting. No quotes or even "sources say".
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...