Jump to content

Tanner Scott Prefers the Bullpen


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
On 1/14/2018 at 8:23 AM, tntoriole said:

Sorry, Tanner.  You are not Manny.  You don't get to pick what position you want to play on the big league team.   Oh yeah..... neither did Manny when he was in the minors.   Although now it seems like Manny will be able to pick his spot.    But either way, Tanner, you don't.  

Wait, what? Did you just read that as Scott trying to pick his role? Everyone including Scott (Minus the Orioles) know his role will be as a reliever in the majors. There are open positions on the Orioles roster for a reliever, including a left-handed reliever. So it makes complete sense to me that the guy would like to go for a roster spot. 

I understood why the Orioles did what they did last year with Scott, but he passed that test. They now need to see how he responds to pitching more often, even back to back games with his new and improved slider. 

i see absolutely nothing wrong with Scott voicing his opinion that he would like to be a reliever. Just means the kid lives in reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Wait, what? Did you just read that as Scott trying to pick his role? Everyone including Scott (Minus the Orioles) know his role will be as a reliever in the majors. There are open positions on the Orioles roster for a reliever, including a left-handed reliever. So it makes complete sense to me that the guy would like to go for a roster spot. 

I understood why the Orioles did what they did last year with Scott, but he passed that test. They now need to see how he responds to pitching more often, even back to back games with his new and improved slider. 

i see absolutely nothing wrong with Scott voicing his opinion that he would like to be a reliever. Just means the kid lives in reality.

If Castro makes the rotation and the rule 5’s don’t pan out, the bullpen is wide open. I’d like to see Scott in a traditional role and have him air it out for an inning. I trust Buck with handling relievers. It was smart develop Scott last year in “starts”, but this year we should let him learn how to get MLB hitters out. Then expound on that role if he has success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
7 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

The non existent amount of talk about this guy has me worried that he’s not a nugget. We’re down a top closer, and we hear next to nothing about our lefty in the upper minors that throws 100. That’s strange. 

I think it's because that's kind of all he does so far. There's no devastating breaking ball to go along with that upper 90s fastball. At least not yet.

That, and they desperately want him to become a starter, though that seems like wishful thinking.

That and he doesn't really throw 100 these days because he can't control it.

All of this adds up to being basically Joely Rodriguez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I’m a little worried about Scott. He doesn’t look dominant at all up here. Do the hitters just see the ball too good off him?  

I’m not expecting Andrew Miller, but this guy is looking more like Donnie Hart. At least Hart had breaking pitches, a deceptive wind up, and was murder on LH’s. 

Scott just looks like a guy so far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I’m a little worried about Scott. He doesn’t look dominant at all up here. Do the hitters just see the ball too good off him?  

I’m not expecting Andrew Miller, but this guy is looking more like Donnie Hart. At least Hart had breaking pitches, a deceptive wind up, and was murder on LH’s. 

Scott just looks like a guy so far. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I’m a little worried about Scott. He doesn’t look dominant at all up here. Do the hitters just see the ball too good off him?  

I’m not expecting Andrew Miller, but this guy is looking more like Donnie Hart. At least Hart had breaking pitches, a deceptive wind up, and was murder on LH’s. 

Scott just looks like a guy so far. 

I actually thought he was the one brightspot last night.

Close runner up is Santander with the bat.  Looks like he may be coming out of his slump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
20 minutes ago, ChrisP said:

Is there any chance they try him as a SP next year?

I think that shipped sailed awhile back. He just doesn't have the command, or really control to be a starter.

Scott can have dominant stuff and the hope is that with more time he will become more consistent from outing to outing of even batter to batter sometimes. If I have one concern it's that batters seem to pick up his fastball pretty well, which means he needs to spot it better and I'm not sure he has the command for that.

Regardless, he's the kind of guy who gets the next year or maybe two proving whether he can be a counted on reliever when this team has a chance to be a contender again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Strowd, Hunt, McGough, and Tavera will not be put on the 40 man and will be eligible for the rule 5 or minor league FA if they qualify.   Mullins and Hays are both non tender candidates.   They will not be tendered and then traded.  If either is tendered they're staying.    Isn't Coulombe a FA this year? Cook, Johnson, and Heid could be added, none of them could be added, or some could be added.   All three will  not. That is all.
    • Nevermind, should have clicked the link before posting. 
    • Could he be back by the start of next season? I’m not sure of the exact recovery time for this procedure but I know it’s less than TJS. 
    • A player who is a FA after this year TB is not going to care where he goes. That said they only have Armstrong and Rosario. Potentially Maton. 
    • I don't think we really need to trade for CF just because we have so much depth at COF. We could promote Mayo or Kjerstad permanently and just see how they shake out, which wouldn't offensively be as bad as Mullins has been this year. Slide over Cowser to CF if we can't find that good a deal, and then go for anothter SP arm and some more depth in the pen. They don't trade Basallo because (and this is just me speculating) that they could move on from either Mountcastle or O'Hearn in the 2025-2026 offseason depending on if they can get a good return on them, like what we saw Tampa do with Austin Meadows a couple years back and the Orioles have a backup to replace said bat or bats.  In terms of who we go for, I don't really know. I don't like the idea of reuniting with Tanner Scott because his control issues and walk rate are still very present. I'm not in love with the idea of going for Kopech because the numbers and peripherals are average at best.  Carlos Estavez from the Angels, sure but how high is that asking price going to be? Whoever sells come deadline time could be interesting, as teams like the Cubs and Tigers could potentially be sellers come deadline time. Maybe even the mighty Astros who haven't been as good this year could be persuaded to sell off some talent depending on who we make available. It's a little to early to tell as of right now due to a good chunk of the sport sitting at around 500, but who knows at this point? 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...