Jump to content

NEED one of the Big Three Pitchers Left


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, now said:

The optimist in me wants to argue, Wait...

- What if only one of Davis and Trumbo bounces back with 40 HRs?

- What if Gausman finally has a great year, Bundy and Cashner are average for them, Tillman regains his mechanics, and Cortes lives up to his MiL record?

- What if O'Day pitches like he can and Britton is back by June?

- What if Hays makes an impact, and Mancini continues to outperform his doubters?

- What if Manny and Schoop, now in their prime, both turn it up a notch and vie for MVP honors?

None of those is a "miracle" stretch to imagine. But I guess (says the realist in me, agreeing with you) to expect all those reasonable scenarios to come about at once, amounts to a miracle.

All that is possible. I just hate that we won't boost our chances from "these 5-10 things need to go really well to get a wild card spot" to "we should be penciled in as contenders from day 1".

It feels like that big of a difference to me and it has everything to do with SP. There are guys out there to be had. Getting 4 out of 5 decent enough starts takes a lot of pressure off your team.. And having depth in case one of your guys inevitably goes down, takes pressure of your team. 

Yet we won't venture into the SP waters, all because one of our medium term contracts with a pitcher didn't go that well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 351
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 hours ago, now said:

The optimist in me wants to argue, Wait...

- What if only one of Davis and Trumbo bounces back with 40 HRs?

- What if Gausman finally has a great year, Bundy and Cashner are average for them, Tillman regains his mechanics, and Cortes lives up to his MiL record?

- What if O'Day pitches like he can and Britton is back by June?

- What if Hays makes an impact, and Mancini continues to outperform his doubters?

- What if Manny and Schoop, now in their prime, both turn it up a notch and vie for MVP honors?

None of those is a "miracle" stretch to imagine. But I guess (says the realist in me, agreeing with you) to expect all those reasonable scenarios to come about at once, amounts to a miracle.

Scenarios like this are sort of like playing the lottery.   Yes, there is a single, narrow, path where all the right pieces  do fall exactly right and we win the lottery.  As lottery buyers often find out, there are many, many more ways for any one of those pieces to not fall the right way  (and a bunch more that go south that we don't see coming, injury,  unexpected regression, etc.)    So yeah, could we win?   Sure.   And I think I am going to win each time when I buy a ticket too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Scenarios like this are sort of like playing the lottery.   Yes, there is a single, narrow, path where all the right pieces  do fall exactly right and we win the lottery.  As lottery buyers often find out, there are many, many more ways for any one of those pieces to not fall the right way  (and a bunch more that go south that we don't see coming, injury,  unexpected regression, etc.)    So yeah, could we win?   Sure.   And I think I am going to win each time when I buy a ticket too.  

Orioles basically have to draw blackjack for 5+ consecutive hands to have a legit chance.  Can it happen?  Yes.  Likely to happen?  No.

Sign Cobb or Lynn, the mountain to climb gets smaller.  That seems unlikely as of today.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Orioles basically have to draw blackjack for 5+ consecutive hands to have a legit chance.  Can it happen?  Yes.  Likely to happen?  No.

 

I think that’s probably too dramatic an analogy.    The odds of drawing five blackjacks in a row are about 3.2 million to 1.     I’d say the odds of the Orioles making the playoffs are more like 50-1.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think that’s probably too dramatic an analogy.    The odds of drawing five blackjacks in a row are about 3.2 million to 1.     I’d say the odds of the Orioles making the playoffs are more like 50-1.     

The odds of the O's signing another starting pitcher to a 4 year or longer deal this offseason would be closer to 3.2 million to 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Frobby said:

I think that’s probably too dramatic an analogy.    The odds of drawing five blackjacks in a row are about 3.2 million to 1.     I’d say the odds of the Orioles making the playoffs are more like 50-1.     

That sounds too high. I'd put 20 bucks on that.

You do mean making the WC game, right? Or the ALDS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

I think the Orioles are a playoff team if Dylan Bundy is an ace. I really think that’s all this team needs to plant themselves there. 

And all he needs to become an ace are the three or four ticks of his fastball that never appeared again after his Tommy John surgery. Might be best to learn happy with him as a consistent and dependable #3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, OsEatAlEast said:

I'm torn between Lynn and Cobb. Both pitch well against the AL East. Much smaller sample size for Lynn of course. Cobb has done well against all AL East teams and the only one Lynn has done bad against is the O's.

I like Lynn personally and coming from a good organization I worry less about the league switch. Cobb has the track record and familiarity which is nice.  A tossup for me, but either one would make the O's a serious contender IMO. 

Archer would be the "let's go to war" move, but I honestly have no idea what a reasonable trade offer would be for him. The Rays would ask for the world I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, OsEatAlEast said:

I'm torn between Lynn and Cobb. Both pitch well against the AL East. Much smaller sample size for Lynn of course. Cobb has done well against all AL East teams and the only one Lynn has done bad against is the O's.

Torn for whom?  The Twins?   Could your you imagine what we would offer at this point?  5 million dollar one year deal with million of that difered and a chance of 5 million more incentives that would be paid in 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I admit I got baited by the thread title a bit and popped off before actually listening to the thing.  It doesn't really change that I've always been concerned about Cal being part of the ownership group, but I was definitely hasty to be like "SEE??". Anyway, I've got my eye on Cal. The guy just rubs me the wrong way. But hopefully nothing much to see here, or in the future. 
    • Meanwhile, I have a question about Mayo’s defense.  Everybody implies that it’s dreadful. I guess I can understand that he’s not Manny or Brooks, but how bad is it? Are we hoping he’s at least as good as George Brett, about whom someone once said,(paraphrasing), “his defense is so bad it’s like he carries his bat to the base instead of his glove.“? I love defense, and I see absolutely no reason to move Westburg away. if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. It seems far more advisable to plunk Mayo at first and do something with the guys we currently have there?  
    • I think the thread title was misleading.  Not necessarily intentionally.  But if you just  see that without reading everything that was said and considering the context, it would be concerning.  
    • You know, for $24 a year, a measly lousy 24 bucks a year, you can edit your comment. And you can also support @Tony-OHwho has done more work online to create an Orioles environment than literally anybody else in the entire Internet universe.
    • I think there see plenty of guys who will stay with a contending team they like if the money is close.   But Burnes clearly intends to test the market.   No significant home team discount is coming, and it just takes one team to offer something crazy to knock us out of the picture unless we’re just being stupid. 
    • When Mateo is hitting well, he really makes you wonder why he can’t do it all the time.   He looks really balanced at the plate, he uses all fields, etc.  He doesn’t look like a bad hitter who happens to be on a heater.   But that’s what his track record shows he is, until proven otherwise.  I remember that Fangraphs article last year about how Mateo had changed his approach and the improvement seemed real.  Well, no it wasn’t.  But maybe his issues are more psychological than physical?   He’s just a guy who when he slumps, quickly loses confidence and starts pressing and makes it worse?   I don’t know.    As to your point about OBP: in 2024, a .299 OBP is below average but I might not say it blows.  The MLB average is back down to .312 after a spike last year after the rule changes.  Of 312 players with 80+ PA, Mateo’s .299 ranks 191st, or 39th percentile.   Honestly, in this environment, if Mateo could stay at .299 OBP he’d be a very credible player.   But he’s a .272 career OPS guy who’d been at .267 the last two years, so I’m not expecting he’ll be able to stay at .299.   I’ll enjoy it while he’s hot though.   And he is playing a mean 2B.   Took him a couple of weeks to settle in there, but he’s looked great for the last month.    
    • I broached the experiment of Holliday in CF some months ago.  It seems to be something that could make sense.  I still expect he'll be our 2B moving forward, but having such versatility is never a bad thing.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...