Jump to content

Wieters and Rutschman


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

As long as the O's get the 6+ years out of him I don't care if he signs a minor league deal with the Cardinals three years later.

I think that's generally a perfectly reasonable approach to the draft. I want my #1 overall to be an Orioles HOFer though. 10+ years with a statue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

23 hours ago, LookinUp said:

I think that's generally a perfectly reasonable approach to the draft. I want my #1 overall to be an Orioles HOFer though. 10+ years with a statue.

 

Those are two very different standards. Based on historical Orioles Hall of Famer standards, Wieters WILL be and Orioles Hall of Famer. 10+ years with a statute is reserved for Baseball Hall of Famers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keith Law believes Rutschman is a weaker prospect than the last two players who went 1:1. Curious to see whether his opinion improves as Fangraphs' did when he sees him in a few weeks.

Robert
2:14
Adley feels like a pretty solid #1 talent. Better than recent years but perhaps not generational. How do you think he stacks up talent wise to recent 1s?
 
Keith Law
2:14
I'll see him in a few weeks, but I feel like he's below the last couple of 1-1 picks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Keith Law believes Rutschman is a weaker prospect than the last two players who went 1:1. Curious to see whether his opinion improves as Fangraphs' did when he sees him in a few weeks.

Robert
2:14
Adley feels like a pretty solid #1 talent. Better than recent years but perhaps not generational. How do you think he stacks up talent wise to recent 1s?
 
Keith Law
2:14
I'll see him in a few weeks, but I feel like he's below the last couple of 1-1 picks.

Everyone else is saying how good Rutschman looks so of course KLaw is down on him.

It's his pattern.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why not reserve judgement until you do see him?

That something he could have done right?

But we wouldn't be talking about him.

I guess so, but presumably he saw him last year, so I'm not sure why his opinion of him from then should be entirely disregarded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why not reserve judgement until you do see him?

That something he could have done right?

But we wouldn't be talking about him.

Ehh. Law isn't a likable person, but he is a really solid baseball analyst and a very independent thinker. I don't get the sense that all of the stuff he says to anger various fanbases is contrived at all. If he think's Adley's lower rated than the last two 1-1's, it's because that's his very real impression...and I personally take that impression seriously.

At least he did say he hasn't seen him yet this year. That leaves the door open for new/updated impressions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LookinUp said:

Ehh. Law isn't a likable person, but he is a really solid baseball analyst and a very independent thinker. I don't get the sense that all of the stuff he says to anger various fanbases is contrived at all. If he think's Adley's lower rated than the last two 1-1's, it's because that's his very real impression...and I personally take that impression seriously.

At least he did say he hasn't seen him yet this year. That leaves the door open for new/updated impressions.

I think he most certainly makes the out of the field hot take for attention.  Like picking Tatis over Vlad.  Or when he proclaimed that Bundy wasn't one of the O's top 10 prospects.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think he most certainly makes the out of the field hot take for attention.  Like picking Tatis over Vlad.  Or when he proclaimed that Bundy wasn't one of the O's top 10 prospects.

That's the new media landscape, gotta do anything for clicks or else how can get audience attention when you're saying the same thing that everyone else is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think he most certainly makes the out of the field hot take for attention.  Like picking Tatis over Vlad.  Or when he proclaimed that Bundy wasn't one of the O's top 10 prospects.

You may be right. When I have seen him say controversial things, he seems to have a good rationale from my perspective. I don't follow him loyally though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think he most certainly makes the out of the field hot take for attention.  Like picking Tatis over Vlad.  Or when he proclaimed that Bundy wasn't one of the O's top 10 prospects.

Law was very high on Casey Mize (2018) but not that high on Royce Lewis (2017).    I’m surprised he’d say he doesn’t think Rutschman was as good as Lewis, except maybe with the benefit of hindsight, since Lewis is now a consensus top 10 prospect.    

http://www.espn.com/blog/keith-law/insider/post/_/id/8429

http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=19619043

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2019 at 9:31 AM, Frobby said:

If you think Vaughn will be a substantially better hitter than Rutschman, you can certainly make the case.    As measured by WAR, Joey Votto has been more valuable in 11+ years (58 WAR) than Joe Mauer was in his 14+ seasons (55), the last several of which were spent at 1B anyway.   Paul Goldschmidt (40 WAR through age 30) may end up being more valuable than Mauer.    Freddie Freeman (33 WAR through age 28) may get there.   And Mauer was one of the most valuable catchers ever, certainly the most valuable of the last 15 years.   

That said, you’d have to be very convinced of Vaughn’s bat to pick him over Rutschman.   

Does it bother anyone else that Vaughn is only 5’11”? You just don’t see a lot of 1b at that height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Unless one of Cowser, Heston or Stowers wakes up one morning as a RHed batter or switch hitter, I don't think the veteran OFs are going anywhere. Urias and Mateo are a different story. One of them should go tp clear a roster spot. For me, Urias is an easy choice to be the one sent packing, whether with nothing in return or a lottery-ticket pitching prospect who throws hard (or two), but I understand that others disagree. And maybe they're both gone. One of the unknowables about this team is whether Jackson Holliday can be a useful part of it later this season.
    • The Orioles always seem to give a guy the day off after his first day back post-injury. They've done that with a lot of guys on the ML team, and I suspect they are just treating Holliday very carefully. 
    • Wow its finally here. I've been looking for this since January thanks for posting.
    • We REALLY need to get Suarez out of this rotation. It's been fun, but he's hitting a wall and really should be a reliever. Kremer soon, I guess. 
    • Yeah it would, then the question is . What is their definition of “ off the rails “ ?  Either way, we get the answer within 30 days 
    • You totally negate your argument to keep him when you say you don't think he would return anyone that would make it worthwhile. I think Mountcastle is a good clubhouse guy and has been a very solid player.  I was happy that the Orioles moved Mancini to Houston to make room for Mountcastle.  A similar move here could be beneficial.   The situations are not identical.  Mancini was a pending free agent and even though the Orioles were in the hunt of a playoff, they were not considered a contender.  So moving Mancini brought us back useful pieces AND allowed Mountcastle to step in. IF the Orioles move Mountcastle, they need to get SP or RP to help now, right?  It would be pretty ballsy to trade him for minor league pitching depth only.  I think Kjerstad or Mayo could outhit him the rest of the way, but I just don't think you move him unless it is for pitching that can help now. And to your point, I think Mountcastle could return pitching help.  Absolutely.  
    • There are times I forget that Ryan Mountcastle is only 27-years-old and we have 2.5 years of control remaining.  It seems like he should be close to 29-30.   
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...