Jump to content

Dylan Bundy 2019


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, baltfan said:

My obsession with Chris Davis watching third strikes has been replaced with my obsession with Bundy throwing fastballs right down the middle.  It would be great if the velocity was better, but location is his biggest issue.  

I don't know what the issue is with Bundy. Sometimes I wonder if in his mind he believes he can still throw his fb by good hitters. Secondly, don't let the big guns beat you. The first HR ok, but to do it again with a man on base is crazy, poor location and pitch selection. What is Bundy's baseball IQ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Which isn’t saying much.   

Quote

Hyde on Bundy: “I thought this was Dylan’s best start. I thought he had really good stuff. Two good breaking balls, a really good changeup. He had more hop on his fastball. Just the long ball ...

“Pitch count was low. We were down three runs, and he pitched into the sixth inning. Right away, two homers knocked him out of the game. But I thought from the stuff standpoint, it was the best I’ve seen him all year. I thought his changeup was really good. He kept guys off-balance. It was just a few mistakes. They didn’t hit singles. They went deep.”

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2019/04/homestand-ends-with-more-homers-allowed-in-8-5-loss.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TonySoprano said:

“It was just a few mistakes. They didn’t hit singles. They went deep.” 

Other than that, how did you like the play, Mrs. Lincoln?

Either he’s serious or he’s playing a 3-dimensional chess and he’s way over my head. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yes, I remember yesteryear when it was a thread of should we trade Bundy and people clamoring about saving for the future. The future looks pretty, pretty bright right about now.

Now to be fair, he has been hurt. But if we had a decent offer for him after the 2014 season and being 4 games away from the World Series, I'd be hot. This is one of the reason I'm not a fan of holding folks just based on what they could be. Especially if we're locked in as a good team. (Which we were at the time) Now Bundy just looks like another guy ready to give up 20 runs a game.

 

Hope he rebounds though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

He had 8 Ks. That’s probably what Hyde is focusing on. 

I think we should just bite the bullet and make him a reliever. He won’t pitch in very many high leverage situations but he will bring back more as a reliever next year/offseason via trade than the worst ERA qualified SP. 

I know it doesn't show up in the numbers, but if the guy has to come in for one or two innings, the stuff could play up. The control could be better. Think, Tommy "Home Run" Hunter. Has had a fine career as a reliever. 

Edited by Bubble Buddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Bubble Buddy said:

I know it doesn't show up in the numbers, but if the guy has to come in for one or two innings, the stuff could play up. The control could be better. Think, Tommy "Home Run" Hunter. Has had a fine career as a reliever. 

He might be good out of the pen, but his salary is too high for a middle reliever. He would be non-tendered by the O's this off-season and get what he can as a free agent from whichever team is willing to pay him. He only works in Baltimore as a starter, and he has to get better at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

He might be good out of the pen, but his salary is too high for a middle reliever. He would be non-tendered by the O's this off-season and get what he can as a free agent from whichever team is willing to pay him. He only works in Baltimore as a starter, and he has to get better at it.

I don't necessarily agree that he has to be a middle reliever. I think it's possible he could be a late inning guy.

There are plenty of examples of guys where control improved with a move to the pen. The question is whether he could get a bump to mid 90's velocity. But his stuff is probably better than Hunter's was. Things may just sharpen up with a move to the pen. Especially in Bundy's case where it seems he tires during the season/games, has had injuries, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's what I was afraid of.  I'm sure Elias will kick the tires.  WS will be asking for package headed by one of Holliday, Mayo or Basallo.  Maybe price will come down in the offseason.
    • Suarez is probably going to have to go back to the pen. We just don’t have enough arms there to make it through the season, especially with having very few relievers who can pitch more than 1 inning. Even though Suarez has been the much better pitcher than Kremer, he gives you no length. He is the basic definition of a “5 and dive” pitcher.  I guess they could try Kremer as a back end reliever given his strike out stuff and penchant for not being able to go through a lineup a third time. However, the downside to that is his susceptibility to the long ball.
    • This is Crochet's first full year back from TJS after 12 IP last year. You'd have to think if you are trading for him, it's not for this year, but next year as he's likely only got a few more starts left him if he's handled responsibly, which he should be, coming back from TJS. He's under control through the 2026 season and there is value in that even though he's arb eligible and will likely get a nice bump in salary.
    • Luzardo screams "flames out in a few years" to me. No thanks, or at least for what he'll cost. Robert has played literally one full season of baseball in his entire life. Again, too much risk and no thanks. Crochet would be a good target, because we get him for 2 1/2 years and is an elite lefty. Given where CHW are, a package with Kjerstad and one of our young pitchers (headlining) makes sense for both teams.  If we are forced to effectively give up on Mullins or Hays (either BC of injury or general suckiness), Taylor Ward does make sense. His name has been tossed around a lot. His splits playing against AL East teams kinda scare me, but he's a RH bat that can play good defensive OF and under team control for a few years and probably won't cost much. As for bullpen arms, this seems like the hardest to predict. CHW doesn't really have anybody pitching well there. The Marlins have our old friend Tanner Scott, but he isn't anything near a sure thing like other experienced closers. Mason Miller will cost too much. Chapman may make sense if DC is out. As a 36 year old rental he won't cost as much, which will be important if we go all in for a starter. His wildness will make our blood boil but he still has the swing and miss stuff and obviously a ton of playoff experience. Maybe Beeks from COL? Another lefty bullpen rental.
    • I was against the idea of a Crochet addition before the Bradish injury because I didn’t see the need. Now, I’m all for it. He would be a gamble but a much better buy than Luzardo who is not pitching well at all this season. He (Luzardo) would be the kind of non-impact move that we tried last year, that blew up in our faces.  On the other hand Robert is more of a luxury move than a need. IMO the needs are now top end starting pitcher (#2/3 type) AND shut down reliever. Anything addition beyond that is gravy. The priorities are pitching.
    • I think a RH bat is all we need offensively. I’d look at JD Martinez. 
    • How do other teams have ANY leverage? It’s not like Elias is forced to deal with them. If he was only dealing with one yea they would have leverage because the Orioles have a need on the roster. But because there are MULTIPLE with MULTIPLE players he can move on from any team and they will get nothing from us. Those other teams are incentivized to move their players JUST AS MUCH as we are incentivized to add. NOBODY is getting Westburg (or even asking for him at this point) or ANY OTHER MAINSTAY Major Leaguer of the roster. That’s not how the trade deadline works. As I mentioned nobody is going to the Yankees and saying give us Gil, Soto, Judge, Rodon, etc. Nobody is asking the Dodgers for Betts, Freeman, Ohtani, etc. Teams who are rebuilding/selling are asking for prospects. Oakland and the Chicago White Sox are not one player or even one year away. Guys who are already established now (even young ones like Jordan Westburg) do nothing for them in their phase of rebuilding.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...