Jump to content

Ryan McKenna 2019


Luke-OH

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

There are 19 hitters in the Eastern League with a minimum of 126 at-bats that are 22 or younger. There are more than 19 good hitting prospects in the Eastern League.

Picking a year at random, 2015, the following Eastern League hitters were over 22 (minimum 141 at-bats):

JaCoby Jones, Adam Frazier, Try Mancini, Aaron Judge, Wilmer Difo, Tyler Naquin, Aaron Altherr

There were 21 hitters 22 and under that year, 21 of them have made the Majors, the only one who hasn't, Hunter Cole, currently has a .908 OPS in the PCL and probably will be called up in September.

 

 

8 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

There are 19 hitters in the Eastern League with a minimum of 126 at-bats that are 22 or younger. There are more than 19 good hitting prospects in the Eastern League.

Picking a year at random, 2015, the following Eastern League hitters were over 22 (minimum 141 at-bats):

JaCoby Jones, Adam Frazier, Try Mancini, Aaron Judge, Wilmer Difo, Tyler Naquin, Aaron Altherr

There were 21 hitters 22 and under that year, 21 of them have made the Majors, the only one who hasn't, Hunter Cole, currently has a .908 OPS in the PCL and probably will be called up in September.

 

First, I agree that 22 is still “young” for a AA prospect.  23 and 24 are the prime ages. But it is not as young as your numbers suggest. Only a subset of players spend a whole or most of a season there, so you are excluding 22 year olds who were promoted after the start of the season. There are two other 22 year old players currently on the Bowie roster, for example (one is a hitter...Torres is actually 21, not 22 but he’s got the same birth year as MCKenna so I’ll count him as 22). Second, you are ignoring the players who are above AA.  For example, I quickly skimmed the list of players who have played in the majors this year and counted ten 22 year olds who played in the majors this year and I didn’t make it past the B’s. BUT, I do agree that 22 is still very young for AA.  But there are 22 year olds on most teams and many good prospects spend part of the year at AA.   

 

I think your 2015 choices are an interesting comparison.  Most of those guys dramatically out hit McKenna in AA.  Most of them were over .800 OPS and a couple were hammering the ball.  Trey Mancini, for example, crushed AA pitching at that age.  Really only one player hit as poorly as McKenna and Difo has been a part time, all glove middle infielder for a few years.  Being average in AA at 22 tells you very little.  Being average at 19 in AA or being a monster in AA at 22 would tell you more.  If you don’t believe me, then you can find the age adjustment regressions online and play with the numbers.  McKenna’s age won’t change much.  I think McKenna playing at AA this year is a product of the Orioles aggressive promotion of him last year.  

 

Again, I’m not trying to be a tit for tat internet jerk.  My tone often comes off as far more aggressive than I mean to sound.  I’m still very, very skeptical of McKenna. I’m not convinced by the age argument.  I think his Frederick performance was a fluky tease.  I will, however, happily admit I was wrong if McKenna develops into a regular player.  I actually hope I am wrong.  Regardless of our differences of opinion, I think we can all agree that next year is critical for his future development.  If he starts the year hit at Bowie, then I am sure he will spend significant time in Norfolk.  If he hits, then all will be well.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ohfan67 said:

 

First, I agree that 22 is still “young” for a AA prospect.  23 and 24 are the prime ages. But it is not as young as your numbers suggest. Only a subset of players spend a whole or most of a season there, so you are excluding 22 year olds who were promoted after the start of the season. There are two other 22 year old players currently on the Bowie roster, for example (one is a hitter...Torres is actually 21, not 22 but he’s got the same birth year as MCKenna so I’ll count him as 22). Second, you are ignoring the players who are above AA.  For example, I quickly skimmed the list of players who have played in the majors this year and counted ten 22 year olds who played in the majors this year and I didn’t make it past the B’s. BUT, I do agree that 22 is still very young for AA.  But there are 22 year olds on most teams and many good prospects spend part of the year at AA.   

This is from a Kiley McDainel chat on Fangraphs today:

Logan: When you talk about someone being young/old for their level, what are those ages at each level?
 
1:18

Kiley McDaniel: For prospects, the baseline is
18 – Rookie
19 – short-season
20 – Low-A
21 – High-A
22 – Double-A
23 – Triple-A

 
1:18

Kiley McDaniel: if a prospect is younger than those benchmarks, its a notable feather in the cap and you can round up a bit

 
1:1l9

Kiley McDaniel: for top 100-type prospects, they tend to be a level/year ahead of this rubric, starting Low-A at age 19 in first full season after being a HS pick, 17 in rookie ball after being J2 signee

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Do you think the O's will protect McKenna from the Rule 5 draft?   Do you think any team could keep him on the 25 roster all season next year?

We were able to keep Rickard who was more prepared with his bat, but it sounds like McKenna could be a capable 4th OF right now.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Do you think the O's will protect McKenna from the Rule 5 draft?   Do you think any team could keep him on the 25 roster all season next year?

Does plus plus speed with "great" D play? (cough Ricky Martin cough)

dWAR is not an exact science @weams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Do you think the O's will protect McKenna from the Rule 5 draft?   Do you think any team could keep him on the 25 roster all season next year?

I think you have to keep him unless you're convinced he's never going to hit. I'm not high on him, but I actually think it's a no brainer for this org.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LookinUp said:

I think you have to keep him unless you're convinced he's never going to hit. I'm not high on him, but I actually think it's a no brainer for this org.

Its not a question of whether the O's keep him.  Its a question on whether someone would claim him as a Rule 5 guy and keep him all season.   If the other team doesn't keep him all season then he comes back to the O's.

Survivedc's comment about being a 4th outfielder makes me think he might be selected in the Rule 5 draft.  I mean if some team still wants Broxton in the majors then maybe someone would take McKenna and keep him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

Its not a question of whether the O's keep him.  Its a question on whether someone would claim him as a Rule 5 guy and keep him all season.   If the other team doesn't keep him all season then he comes back to the O's.

Survivedc's comment about being a 4th outfielder makes me think he might be selected in the Rule 5 draft.  I mean if some team still wants Broxton in the majors then maybe someone would take McKenna and keep him.

Absolutely. I don't think he'd be a particularly hard stash, especially in the NL with as much substituting as they do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

McKenna with two doubles and a walk tonight in his first four plate appearances. Line sits and .231/.321/.368.

He has had a miserable August, with a .565 OPS coming into tonight, following his best month of the season, an .822 OPS July.

He's looked miserable at the plate the last week or so, bad body language, poor confidence. It looks like he needs the offseason to get himself together. The ability is there, I mean, he still lashes the balls at times and the defensive ability is strong. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

He's looked miserable at the plate the last week or so, bad body language, poor confidence. It looks like he needs the offseason to get himself together. The ability is there, I mean, he still lashes the balls at times and the defensive ability is strong. 

Hopefully he gets his head right and has a good year at Norfolk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • For reference, below are Career stats since 2014 (min 300 PAs) for players K% at least 32%, plus NCAA K% in final year pre-draft. Player MLB K% wRC+ NCAA K%* Matt Wallner 34.9% 136 17.5% Brent Rooker 32.5% 129 18.8% Edouard Julien 32.2% 123 25.9% Miguel Sano 36.5% 114 n/a Ryan Schimpf 33.3% 114 15.3% James Outman 32.7% 110 22.0% Chris Carter 32.6% 110 n/a Luke Raley 32.1% 110 5.7% Juan Francisco 36.3% 108 n/a Ryan Noda 33.9% 108 30.0% Jarrett Parker 32.0% 108 19.2% Nolan Gorman 33.9% 107 n/a Joey Gallo 38.1% 107 n/a Patrick Wisdom 36.7% 106 17.8% Brandon Marsh 32.7% 106 n/a Elly de la Cruz 32.3% 105 n/a Oneil Cruz 33.2% 104 n/a Keston Hiura 35.9% 103 14.6% Tom Murphy 32.1% 103 17.7% Edwin Rios 33.7% 100 13.6% Will Benson 35.1% 99 n/a Alex Avila 33.8% 98 19.6% Tyler Austin 36.9% 96 n/a Blake Sabol 33.0% 96 15.0% Trayce Thompson 32.7% 96 n/a Jose Siri 34.7% 95 n/a Chris Davis 34.5% 95 n/a Drew Stubbs 35.6% 94 20.8% Kirk Nieuwenhuis 34.0% 94 n/a Matt Davidson 34.8% 92 n/a Bobby Dalbec 36.8% 90 30.7% Daniel Palka 34.7% 90 21.4% Drew Waters 32.8% 90 n/a   *final year pre-draft
    • It'd take a multi-year commitment though.    I think somewhere between Kyle Gibson and Chris Bassitt is that tipping point Elias cares about. Cole Irvin might be a fit filling out behind Berrios/Gausman if they go as far as Bassitt but not as far as everyone.  
    • I think the years of control are more valuable than a relief pitcher unless he is elite (I don't think any of those are available) or has at least two more years beyond this year of control. 
    • Yes, I think that is what the front office is projecting for base case - Jose Siri/Drew Stubbs type player that’s worth 2 WAR per year given defense. With hope that the bat is more Brent Rooker/Miguel Sano/Joey Gallo/Nolan Gorman, but with a realistic outlook on ability to bring down the Ks.  That might not sound exciting, but for 22nd pick it’s good value. Scouting/player dev potential also is likely to play a greater role in this type of pick, so hopefully they see some very specific improvement opportunities.  
    • I think someone posted an analysis earlier in the thread that called him a guess hitter. I haven’t seen much about his plate discipline, mostly just analysis that he has pitch recognition issues in addition to holes in his swing. Longenhagen: A swing change might remedy this but there are also breaking ball recognition issues here; Honeycutt had a 56% contact rate against sliders in 2024. Law: His bigger issue is pitch and ball/strike recognition, as he swung and missed on nearly a third of the pitches he saw, including a 21 percent whiff rate on pitches in the zone.
    • Bassitt at 1/21 for 2025 is probably a better deal than Toronto could get on the market if they run it one last time. I noticed 2nd half we have all 7 of our games with them in a short burst near the trade deadline. Manoah and Tiedemann both having disappointing seasons, so they need innings if they care about competing. Kikuchi had a terrible game yesterday winding down the first half.
    • I agree that’s a hurdle, but in theory Bassitt is more replaceable than trading Vlad or Bichette, though. They could trade Bassitt and that opens up his $21M salary next year to sign a new free agent pitcher of about the same caliber (maybe even Kikuchi?), and they pocket the prospects they get in return for the half season they aren’t competitive.  Jays could be an interesting fit for Urias, they’re planning on being competitive next year and their 3B/2B group is pretty weak.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...