Jump to content

Keegan Akin 2019


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

Here's a nuance I don't have down pat - it wouldn't cost us an option in 2019 if we called him up and he stayed up, right?

I think I may have found the favorite for "leads team in September innings pitched".

Yeah, because he has to be on the 40-man in the offseason, he will definitely be up in September unless he gets injured and shut down before then. No option used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Doesn't seem to be a sound process to make that type of move for so minor an issue.  Unlike my stance on position players I'd rather go slowly with pitchers.

I didn’t realize you had a different position on pitchers than hitters.   I’m curious as to why.    If I was going to view them differently (which I don’t, really), I might be inclined to go the other direction, on the theory that arms only have so many pitches in them, so why waste them in the minors if the guy has major league talent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Frobby said:

I didn’t realize you had a different position on pitchers than hitters.   I’m curious as to why.    If I was going to view them differently (which I don’t, really), I might be inclined to go the other direction, on the theory that arms only have so many pitches in them, so why waste them in the minors if the guy has major league talent?

Sorry for the delay, didn't want to do this one on mobile.  First off I'm talking about starting pitchers, not relievers, I should have specified that.  I'm pretty much fine with throwing a kid right out of college into a ML bullpen.

I could point to the Rays and the O's and say, the Rays always promote slowly and their young pitching always looks like they know what they are doing while the O's have rushed guys and they look unfinished when they get here.  And that is part of it.

There are a number of factors that I looked at. 

  1. Defense peaks early.  Position players can provide value with their gloves (Machado and Schoop for example) while their bats catch up.
  2. Stressful innings are more likely damaging innings.  A hitter in over his head should be fine in time, a young pitcher in over his head is more likely to end up in a situation where his arm is stressed, increasing his chance of injury.
  3. Position players are easier to hide than pitchers.  To have a young pitcher go out there and get slammed every fifth day seems a lot more traumatic than having a position player struggle at the bottom of the order.  The pitcher struggles also puts pressure on the whole team in a way that a hitter struggling doesn't.
  4. I view pitching as more of a craft than hitting.  I think there is more to learn and more to master.
  5. With the introduction of ML balls to AAA I think it is very useful for pitchers to get experience using them.  I don't think it matter nearly as much for position players.
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sorry for the delay, didn't want to do this one on mobile.  First off I'm talking about starting pitchers, not relievers, I should have specified that.  I'm pretty much fine with throwing a kid right out of college into a ML bullpen.

I could point to the Rays and the O's and say, the Rays always promote slowly and their young pitching always looks like they know what they are doing while the O's have rushed guys and they look unfinished when they get here.  And that is part of it.

There are a number of factors that I looked at. 

  1. Defense peaks early.  Position players can provide value with their gloves (Machado and Schoop for example) while their bats catch up.
  2. Stressful innings are more likely damaging innings.  A hitter in over his head should be fine in time, a young pitcher in over his head is more likely to end up in a situation where his arm is stressed, increasing his chance of injury.
  3. Position players are easier to hide than pitchers.  To have a young pitcher go out there and get slammed every fifth day seems a lot more traumatic than having a position player struggle at the bottom of the order.  The pitcher struggles also puts pressure on the whole team in a way that a hitter struggling doesn't.
  4. I view pitching as more of a craft than hitting.  I think there is more to learn and more to master.
  5. With the introduction of ML balls to AAA I think it is very useful for pitchers to get experience using them.  I don't think it matter nearly as much for position players.

Great answer, thanks.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, orioles22 said:

Hess blew Akin's win. I hate when that happens. Too bad someone didn't pick him up.

Eh, I don't think getting the "win" is that important to Akin.  It was a good night, and hopefully he's closer to coming up and starting some games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know wins aren't in vogue these days, but I can't help wanting to see our starters get them. I remember following Palmer trying to get to 20 in the old days. I can't help myself. I was happy Lowther got more support from the bullpen than Akin.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, orioles22 said:

I know wins aren't in vogue these days, but I can't help wanting to see our starters get them. I remember following Palmer trying to get to 20 in the old days. I can't help myself. I was happy Lowther got more support from the bullpen than Akin.

 

Put it this way: I was much more upset that Hess’ conversion to reliever isn’t going well, than I was about Akin not getting a W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

I amended the title of the article to reflect the focus of the 2 players that are headed to the AAA All-Star Game.

Scroll down to the final 4 paragraphs for the information on their selection.

 

Mountcastle and Akin are Headed to the AAA All-Star Game

(By Steve Melewski)

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2019/06/os-skipper-showing-patience-as-losses-mount-plus-il-all-stars.html

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I completely agree with this.  Most of this damage has already been done.  Travel teams have ruined many kids and have left others far more susceptible to injury in the minors and majors.  
    • I only heard Mel Proctor when he was working the Rangers games, and I really liked him. I don’t remember whether he worked with Dick Risenhoover or Mark Holtz, but I think he worked with Mark Holtz, although he was on his own for a little while, but I really liked him.
    • Just getting caught up here, so my first reaction to trading JW is NOOOOOO! However, I think most people around baseball would have to agree that he's a dude. He's become my favorite Oriole just because of his approach at the plate and also his workman-like attitude. Leaving out my preferences and putting on my front office hat I have to admit he would be attractive to other teams for his ability to play three positions in the IF and his steady performance with the bat. And unlike Holliday, he's proven himself.  While Holliday is the more high profile guy to other teams I'm not sure he's seen as more valuable. JW can play SS-has the arm for it-and he's versatile. I think Holliday could learn to play 2B but has neither the arm for 3B or SS. He likely has more range and as earlier stated by another poster, some team may want to try him at SS. Maybe that works, maybe it doesn't.  I feel like I'm making the case to keep JW and trade JH. Back to the question, which guy gets the Orioles what they need to be the favorite going into the playoffs? Number one pick or a guy who's a ML starter right now? Let's set that aside, maybe it's either one. Can either of them get us Skubal in the right package? Yes. That's the guy who IS a ML pitcher and who will move the needle. What's the package? Elias has earned some level of baseball knowledge with the Burnes trade and the trade that sent Bundy to the Angels when Elias first arrived. That one was even more evidence of his ability to read the tea leaves. So, I trust he'll make it work. I may not like the immediate results (i.e. trading Westy or Kjerstad), but if he can get Skubal in the right deal I'd make the deal. But Scherzer is a good back up and won't cost nearly as much.
    • 39 Yacqui Rivera - he was the PTBNL in the Scott/Sulser deal along with the comp pick.  Juan Nunez - he was the 3rd piece in the Jorge Lopez trade with the Twins along with Povich/Cano/4th piece
    • Yes of course, that was a typo. Westburg at 3B and Mayo at 1B
    • Matt Olson comes to mind but yes an extension is not relevant to the conversation.
    • One game or series at a time. Keep the players fresh with an off day with rotating basis . This summer heat is no joke 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...