Jump to content

2019 2nd round pick (42): Gunnar Henderson - SS - John T. Morgan Academy (AL)


Recommended Posts

OK here’s a strategy question:

Let’s say the draft is very weak, but next year’s is strong and deep. How feasible is it to deliberately take somebody you know will not sign, you choose them, they say “no I’m going to college,” you say,”Ooops, so sad“ so that you can get an extra selection in the following draft, where you are more likely to get a stronger player even if your pick is later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Philip said:

OK here’s a strategy question:

Let’s say the draft is very weak, but next year’s is strong and deep. How feasible is it to deliberately take somebody you know will not sign, you choose them, they say “no I’m going to college,” you say,”Ooops, so sad“ so that you can get an extra selection in the following draft, where you are more likely to get a stronger player even if your pick is later?

I think the value you lose by delaying the selection makes it a net loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with all above.  This really is a tremendous talent to land in Round 2.  Very few knocks in multiple write-ups.  Appears to be potentially "legit above average hit and power guy".  Love the size, frame, athleticism and that Henderson is young for his age.  It's three or four years out (or more), but having corner, middle of the lineup, infielders in Henderson and Mountcastle plus AR, Hays and Diaz in Bmore is a sufficient talent base to form a competitive team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/4/2019 at 11:35 AM, Philip said:

OK here’s a strategy question:

Let’s say the draft is very weak, but next year’s is strong and deep. How feasible is it to deliberately take somebody you know will not sign, you choose them, they say “no I’m going to college,” you say,”Ooops, so sad“ so that you can get an extra selection in the following draft, where you are more likely to get a stronger player even if your pick is later?

Teams don't do this on purpose, because there are so many unknowns about next year's draft class, but some teams are fine with taking a guy who isn't committed to signing because worst case scenario they get another shot the following year. 

You want Henderson to sign though, he's a good player to get at 42 in any draft. 

This draft wasn't weak, I know that reporting is out there, but it's just lazy. It was actually really strong at the top. It's just missing much high end pitching. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

Teams don't do this on purpose, because there are so many unknowns about next year's draft class, but some teams are fine with taking a guy who isn't committed to signing because worst case scenario they get another shot the following year. 

You want Henderson to sign though, he's a good player to get at 42 in any draft. 

This draft wasn't weak, I know that reporting is out there, but it's just lazy. It was actually really strong at the top. It's just missing much high end pitching. 

As always, thank you for your insight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Braden Shewmake was the 21st pick (by Atlanta), and he seems to be in the same mold as Henderson - a big SS who's likely going to out-grow SS and move to 3B - but from reading about the 2 of them, I'm not sure Shewmake should have been taken ahead of Henderson.  Seems to me the O's got 1st round value there.  If Shewmake was there at 42, would the O's still have taken Henderson?      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I completely agree with this.  Most of this damage has already been done.  Travel teams have ruined many kids and have left others far more susceptible to injury in the minors and majors.  
    • I only heard Mel Proctor when he was working the Rangers games, and I really liked him. I don’t remember whether he worked with Dick Risenhoover or Mark Holtz, but I think he worked with Mark Holtz, although he was on his own for a little while, but I really liked him.
    • Just getting caught up here, so my first reaction to trading JW is NOOOOOO! However, I think most people around baseball would have to agree that he's a dude. He's become my favorite Oriole just because of his approach at the plate and also his workman-like attitude. Leaving out my preferences and putting on my front office hat I have to admit he would be attractive to other teams for his ability to play three positions in the IF and his steady performance with the bat. And unlike Holliday, he's proven himself.  While Holliday is the more high profile guy to other teams I'm not sure he's seen as more valuable. JW can play SS-has the arm for it-and he's versatile. I think Holliday could learn to play 2B but has neither the arm for 3B or SS. He likely has more range and as earlier stated by another poster, some team may want to try him at SS. Maybe that works, maybe it doesn't.  I feel like I'm making the case to keep JW and trade JH. Back to the question, which guy gets the Orioles what they need to be the favorite going into the playoffs? Number one pick or a guy who's a ML starter right now? Let's set that aside, maybe it's either one. Can either of them get us Skubal in the right package? Yes. That's the guy who IS a ML pitcher and who will move the needle. What's the package? Elias has earned some level of baseball knowledge with the Burnes trade and the trade that sent Bundy to the Angels when Elias first arrived. That one was even more evidence of his ability to read the tea leaves. So, I trust he'll make it work. I may not like the immediate results (i.e. trading Westy or Kjerstad), but if he can get Skubal in the right deal I'd make the deal. But Scherzer is a good back up and won't cost nearly as much.
    • 39 Yacqui Rivera - he was the PTBNL in the Scott/Sulser deal along with the comp pick.  Juan Nunez - he was the 3rd piece in the Jorge Lopez trade with the Twins along with Povich/Cano/4th piece
    • Yes of course, that was a typo. Westburg at 3B and Mayo at 1B
    • Matt Olson comes to mind but yes an extension is not relevant to the conversation.
    • One game or series at a time. Keep the players fresh with an off day with rotating basis . This summer heat is no joke 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...