Jump to content

Grayson Rodriguez 2021


LTO's

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, NCRaven said:

Maybe people who actually saw him play and have a feel for his potential believe that they can justify it.

This is true. Plus, people talk. Maybe he's raking in Sarasota and they're just slow-playing his return to the grind to make sure he's fully healthy. Or maybe their just being cautious dropping him. You don't change the whole batting order based on a bad BP or a short slump. But at some point you have to make the change.

They're likely just slow to do so, but I'd guess they will by mid/end of the season if there aren't glowing reports that he's actually showing out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, NCRaven said:

Maybe people who actually saw him play and have a feel for his potential believe that they can justify it.

The same ones that had him ranked ninth coming into the draft?

If he had gone ninth and then hadn't played an inning with no timetable in place for a return to games is he still ranked in the top 100?

I don't think so.  He's still ranked because he went 1-2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Done after 5 -   5 ip. 2h 0 runs 2bb 6k.  71 pitches.
Command wavered slightly in the 4th and 5th. Showed a good aptitude for fielding the position starting a DP to get out of the 4th.  No balls hit particularly hard all night -  couple runners made it to second over the course of his outing, but it didn’t really feel like Binghamton was likely to score. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

Home debut on Tuesday lines him up to start on Sunday as well. Probably won't be able to make it on Tuesday, but may go for Father's Day.

Figured it was 50/50 if he'd take his turn at end of long road trip Sunday.    A little bummed as we are taking kiddo Saturday night for fireworks and I thought we had good shot for him if he went Sunday, but all good.    Akron looks much better than Binghamton and frankly if he can shove twice against the better team, he could flirt with Norfolk before 4th of July.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...