Jump to content

Eric Cross top 15 prospects


dabirds

Recommended Posts

This guy seems to be aggressive with his ETAs for most players, but I would put Mayo in the Majors in 2023 as likely as Westburg being in the Majors in 2022 (as in, it could happen, but chances are quite low). 

Still, it's fun to think that by mid-year 2023 we could be looking at a very interesting team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2021 at 2:54 PM, Frobby said:

That only makes sense.   

I’m not as optimistic on Mayo’s timetable as some.   He may start the year in HiA, but it could be low A.   He only has 125 PA at that level.   Even assuming the former, the odds that he goes from HiA to AA to AAA all in one season at age 20 aren’t that high.   If he gets a substantial number of at bats in AA by the time the year ends, I’d be very pleased with that.  
 

Henderson got just 157 PAs in Delmarva before getting promoted to Aberdeen and he showed less plate discipline. Obviously i will partially depend on how he looks next spring, but I would not be surprised if he starts 2021 in Aberdeen. Saying that, Elias likes to get guys off to a good start at lower levels so I could see him returning for a bit. Either way, I'd like to see him end up with some Double-A time next year. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Henderson got just 157 PAs in Delmarva before getting promoted to Aberdeen and he showed less plate discipline. Obviously i will partially depend on how he looks next spring, but I would not be surprised if he starts 2021 in Aberdeen. Saying that, Elias likes to get guys off to a good start at lower levels so I could see him returning for a bit. Either way, I'd like to see him end up with some Double-A time next year. 

I think he stands an excellent chance to get some AA time next year.  You’re right that he could start in HiA, I just don’t think we should assume it.   If not, and he gets off to a good start in Low A, I think he’ll be on the “Westburg Plan” and get moved pretty quickly.   I tend not to worry much in the offseason about how aggressively the team will move a player the next year; I worry more about the player playing well and creating a reason for a promotion.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think he stands an excellent chance to get some AA time next year.  You’re right that he could start in HiA, I just don’t think we should assume it.   If not, and he gets off to a good start in Low A, I think he’ll be on the “Westburg Plan” and get moved pretty quickly.   I tend not to worry much in the offseason about how aggressively the team will move a player the next year; I worry more about the player playing well and creating a reason for a promotion.   

The one thing Elias showed last season is he's not afraid of in season promotion. Now whether that was because of the missed COVID year or the way he plans to move forward remains to be seen, but anyone who says he doesn't promote aggressively was not paying attention last year. 

He seemed to start guys off where he thought they would get off to a good start and then promoted them until they were challenged. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

The one thing Elias showed last season is he's not afraid of in season promotion. Now whether that was because of the missed COVID year or the way he plans to move forward remains to be seen, but anyone who says he doesn't promote aggressively was not paying attention last year. 

He seemed to start guys off where he thought they would get off to a good start and then promoted them until they were challenged. 

I think that’s a good approach.   I do think he was more deliberate with Rutschman and Rodriguez than with the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2021 at 3:10 PM, dabirds said:

All the national guys love Adam Hall for some reason.  Was never able to figure out why??

It would be nice if Hall showed enough to be deserving of this ranking. But I think we all know he took a step back this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2021 at 3:12 PM, Frobby said:

I don’t look so much at what he says, I just observe what he does.   So far he’s been very conservative on initial placements and, in most cases, slow on promotions.   He did make up for some initial placements with double promotions, though (Stowers, Westburg, Henderson).   Next spring could be interesting with the initial placements of Rom, Westburg, Cowser, Mayo and a few others.  

Put the team in contention at some point and things might get more aggressive though. 
 

I mean can we really read that much with the state of the organization when he inherited and the pandemic?  He had to get his analytics set up initially then Covid happened. I think he was pretty aggressive when he promoted an entire draft class at the same time to Delmarva. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2021 at 2:29 PM, Can_of_corn said:

It will be interesting to see if the Elias ideal of dominating at every level holds up if the ML team is competitive and needs reinforcements.

My guess is as much as he's slow rolling guys now he'll fast-line others to try and maximize the talent on the roster.

Has Mike Elias really slow-rolled prospects? I thought last year was fairly aggressive for many prospects. Adley spent half a year in AA, and half in AAA. This was his first full professional season. Westburg, Stowers and Henderson played at three levels in 2021 in their first full pro seasons. I believe Diaz would have as well if he had not been injured. Many others played across two levels when they showed they were prepared for the move. DL Hall would have been in AAA if not injured. The list goes on.

And if you are talking about the 2019 season, and pitchers like Akin, Lowther, Kremer, etc…were they really slow-rolled in retrospect? Looks to me like they still weren’t ready in 2021. I know there was a general thought on this board that Elias was too slow to promote players. But after 2021, and having some retrospective info, I think it is not a valid observation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

Has Mike Elias really slow-rolled prospects? I thought last year was fairly aggressive for many prospects. Adley spent half a year in AA, and half in AAA. This was his first full professional season. Westburg, Stowers and Henderson played at three levels in 2021 in their first full pro seasons. I believe Diaz would have as well if he had not been injured. Many others played across two levels when they showed they were prepared for the move. DL Hall would have been in AAA if not injured. The list goes on.

And if you are talking about the 2019 season, and pitchers like Akin, Lowther, Kremer, etc…were they really slow-rolled in retrospect? Looks to me like they still weren’t ready in 2021. I know there was a general thought on this board that Elias was too slow to promote players. But after 2021, and having some retrospective info, I think it is not a valid observation. 

Elias proved last season that anyone who thinks he still slow rolled prospects just wasn't paying attention or had their mind made up. Too much was made of players being started at lower levels then some fans thought they should after missing a year due to COVID. However, it was clear that Elias prefers guys get off to good start at perhaps lower levels then quickly move them up, sometimes up two more levels.

I thought he was very aggressive with promoting everyone but Rutschman, who still ended up with a decent amount of AAA PAs. Could Rodriguez have been given a promotion late in the year to AAA to get a taste of the balls up there? Perhaps. But I think Elias preferred to have him get the first positive season down and start him at AAA next year.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Elias proved last season that anyone who thinks he still slow rolled prospects just wasn't paying attention or had their mind made up. Too much was made of players being started at lower levels then some fans thought they should after missing a year due to COVID. However, it was clear that Elias prefers guys get off to good start at perhaps lower levels then quickly move them up, sometimes up two more levels.

I thought he was very aggressive with promoting everyone but Rutschman, who still ended up with a decent amount of AAA PAs. Could Rodriguez have been given a promotion late in the year to AAA to get a taste of the balls up there? Perhaps. But I think Elias preferred to have him get the first positive season down and start him at AAA next year.  

I agree, completely. Pretty clear why things began the way they did. Confidence is essential for any player. Starting them conservatively makes complete sense, especially after COVID. I think some thought the alternate sight was more valuable than it actually was, and initial placements of Henderson and Rutschman surprised some.

There was no reason to push Rodriguez beyond AA in his 21 year old season after COVID. There is a balance between promotion for the purpose of challenging a prospect, skill development and physical development, including the build up of innings. Pitchers like Drew Rom, DL Hall, Jean Pinto, Carter Baumler, Raul Rangel and maybe even Brennan Hanifee should be interesting to follow this year to see their development and how they approach it. Young pitching with promise should be handled intelligently and individually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jammer7 said:

I agree, completely. Pretty clear why things began the way they did. Confidence is essential for any player. Starting them conservatively makes complete sense, especially after COVID. I think some thought the alternate sight was more valuable than it actually was, and initial placements of Henderson and Rutschman surprised some.

There was no reason to push Rodriguez beyond AA in his 21 year old season after COVID. There is a balance between promotion for the purpose of challenging a prospect, skill development and physical development, including the build up of innings. Pitchers like Drew Rom, DL Hall, Jean Pinto, Carter Baumler, Raul Rangel and maybe even Brennan Hanifee should be interesting to follow this year to see their development and how they approach it. Young pitching with promise should be handled intelligently and individually.

You don't think that the vast majority of professional athletes have an abundant supply of confidence in their abilities?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You don't think that the vast majority of professional athletes have an abundant supply of confidence in their abilities?

I think it is more delicate a balance than you think it is. I think some young players can lose confidence quickly. If they have not accomplished anything yet, doubt can creep in when they struggle. There are things each player has to show at each level to move forward. The pressure to perform and move up is huge. They can press, try too hard, and things go awry. 

At some point, they can either compete or they cannot. But I think they have to reach a level of physical, mental and emotional maturity to find out what they are. College stars are different than a HS pick because of their experiences and accomplishments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/26/2021 at 9:18 PM, Jammer7 said:

I think it is more delicate a balance than you think it is. I think some young players can lose confidence quickly. If they have not accomplished anything yet, doubt can creep in when they struggle. There are things each player has to show at each level to move forward. The pressure to perform and move up is huge. They can press, try too hard, and things go awry. 

At some point, they can either compete or they cannot. But I think they have to reach a level of physical, mental and emotional maturity to find out what they are. College stars are different than a HS pick because of their experiences and accomplishments.

Imposter syndrome is real. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...