Jump to content

What other minor leaguers do you want to know about?


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

Teter and Sparks maybe? Is Sparks vulnerable to the minor league phase of the Rule V? I haven't seen either of them play. 

Teter had a nice start to his professional career but he wasn't able to tap into his raw power for playable game power enough for me. He'll play at 23 next year so he'll need to get up to AA next year while hitting for power to get on the prospect scene.

I like some of Sparks tools, especially the arm, and 2021 was a big year for him to stay on the field an play without injury. Unfortunately though, his middling power numbers, average and plate discipline wasn't enough to put up him on the scene. Like Teter, he's 23 next year so he'll need to really move to keep getting priority playing time. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

Teter and Sparks maybe? Is Sparks vulnerable to the minor league phase of the Rule V? I haven't seen either of them play. 

Darn, I think we’re going to lose Sparks then. Finally, after years of waiting for a big year. 
 

@Tony-OHwhat’s the deal with Fenter? Does he 1 IP relief potential or is he just a guy that never recovered from surgery?  Also what about recent draftee Colin Burns?  Did he just struggle too much in his first taste of pro ball?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Darn, I think we’re going to lose Sparks then. Finally, after years of waiting for a big year. 
 

@Tony-OHwhat’s the deal with Fenter? Does he 1 IP relief potential or is he just a guy that never recovered from surgery?  Also what about recent draftee Colin Burns?  Did he just struggle too much in his first taste of pro ball?

That's doubtful. I don't know what roster he has to be protected on but I'll imagine he will be placed on that roster to keep him protected. 

Fenter is another guy that just struggles to find consistency and his stuff fell off for a me a bit though I never really had good video of him him previously. 

Burns has a decent slap hitting line drive approach at the plate and can look smooth at times in the field, but he made way too many errors and there's really not much pop there at all. A good year though could potentially get him on the scene as a utility guy.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m interested whether you’ve heard anything about Junior Lara, who did well in the DSL after getting a late start.   Also, I’m curious what went on with Elio Prado, who was acquired in the Cashner trade, didn’t play this season, but did attend Fall instructs I believe.   I know you won’t have seen either one, but I wonder if Koby Perez had anything to say about either of them.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I’m interested whether you’ve heard anything about Junior Lara, who did well in the DSL after getting a late start.   Also, I’m curious what went on with Elio Prado, who was acquired in the Cashner trade, didn’t play this season, but did attend Fall instructs I believe.   I know you won’t have seen either one, but I wonder if Koby Perez had anything to say about either of them.   

Lara is a small, average tool player who hit well in his first professional taste. We'll have to see how he progresses up the chain. I didn't hear anything about Prado. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Curious about TT Bowens. His offensive numbers at two levels of A-ball weren't outstanding by any stretch, and he's a bit old for the level, but seems like he physically "looks the part" of a masher at 1B/DH.

Bowens certainly has the look and physicality of a player of interest, but he just doesn't do anything well enough to be of interest at a high level. A low average with bad plate discipline is a major league red flag unfortunately. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had posted on some of the draftees in another thread. You've already addressed a few of them, but here are a few more with my quick comments. Not sure if any are interesting or not...

 

Billy Cook - 10th rounder, extreme flyball guy (.33 GO/AO), showed some power
Justin Armbruester - 12th, good results in Delmarva 16 k in 9 IP
Daniel Lloyd - over slot, 14th round
Peter Van Loon - 16th round senior pitcher, decent results
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any thoughts on Maverick Handley or Andrew Daschbach?   Is Handley’s defense as good as some have claimed, and does he have an eventual possible path to the majors despite a light stick?   Daschbach had an .800+ OPS at both Aberdeen and Bowie, though his BA at Bowie was low and he got to .800 OPS with walks and power.  Pretty high whiff rate at both levels.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LookinUp said:

I had posted on some of the draftees in another thread. You've already addressed a few of them, but here are a few more with my quick comments. Not sure if any are interesting or not...

 

Billy Cook - 10th rounder, extreme flyball guy (.33 GO/AO), showed some power
Justin Armbruester - 12th, good results in Delmarva 16 k in 9 IP
Daniel Lloyd - over slot, 14th round
Peter Van Loon - 16th round senior pitcher, decent results
 

Cook hit half his homers in one game (quite the game). Decent power, but plate discipline suggests he will struggle at high levels.

Armbruster is a fastball (93) curveball guy with a short arm delivery that may add in some deception. Fastball looks pretty true though the curveball gets so nice bit at times. Looks like an org guy to me. Pure relief.

Lloyd was a guy who thought enough of himself to be one of the last guys signed and at 20 years old, he had some leverage. I only saw him a few outings and he was around 93 MPH on his fastball according to the broadcaster. It may have a little run but I didn't have great angels. The slider may be a cutter because there is very little break. He also threw what may have been a curveball at some point or a downward breaking slider, but hard to tell. At this point he's not overly interesting as a prospect.

Van Loon I actually like a little better than the other two despite being a 16th rounder. He's a strike thrower, fastball around 93, throws a curve, slider and chance with his curve being the best of the three off-speed pitches. He'll be 23 next year so you would like to see him move quickly and have success against more mature hitters. The curve can be a strike out pitch at times but didn't see a lot of swing and miss on any of his pitches in the zone. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Any thoughts on Maverick Handley or Andrew Daschbach?   Is Handley’s defense as good as some have claimed, and does he have an eventual possible path to the majors despite a light stick?   Daschbach had an .800+ OPS at both Aberdeen and Bowie, though his BA at Bowie was low and he got to .800 OPS with walks and power.  Pretty high whiff rate at both levels.   

Handley is what he was advertised defensively but he can't hit. Probably the best overall defender at catcher in the system, better than Rutschman especially throwing, but he's been pretty much a zero at the plate. 

Daschbach is a bit of stiff power guy for me. More muscle power than quick bat, he did show nice power at Bowie but it came at a price. Not sure he's going to be able to show a consistent enough stick for 1B and he's Mancini like outfielder.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think Mountcastle is the foremost person hurt by Walltimore. I honestly think we need to reconsider what type of right handed batters we throw out there. More Luis Arraez or someone with high OBP. I could see Mountcastle having a revival somewhere else. But not sure it’s really working here anymore, even though he was solid last year. 
    • Who is the real MOO bat though?  I can't think of one other than Soto available.  I am all in on Soto, but I don't think the Orioles will even sniff him.  Absent Soto, who do you look to acquire? I agree that it is time to move on from Tony and Mounty, but I do think you are a little harsh on Tony.  He has won a number of games for this team in the clutch.  He is just prone to cold spells.  
    • OK, there won't be 30 making actual bids but Burnes is free to sign with any team at the highest price. There is one very big reason he won't sign with us, which is money. We do have payroll flexibility but that evaporates if we put $40m/year in one player. I would love this if it happens but my expectations are very low. Even if we are "one of the favorites", say the final four, we only have a 25% chance. Probably lower if any of the others are in larger markets. So I have to agree with Roch's assessment. 
    • In that case the question could be do we pay Mountcastle 6-7M or do we pay a AAAA guy league minimum and use his money on RP. The purpose of keeping Mountcastle was the hope he would eventually break out and have a career year. He’s regressing offensively and the odds of that breakout are shrinking. 
    • With his season now over, curious what happened to the version of Cowser we drafted. looking at his scouting report coming out of Sam Houston State, the concern with him was would his power translate to MLB while his plate discipline and ability to draw walks being a plus. Certainly were concerns about the strikeouts but nowhere near the concerns of someone like Honeycutt.    He finishes the year with 52 walks and 172 strikeouts, with a 30% K rate. He was near the top of the league in strikeouts for most of the year.  is this purely his issues with off speed pitches? Can this be improved or do we accept the awful strikeouts and laud the plus defense.
    • I want to also address the Harper point. I'm talking about RISP, not "late and close". We can talk about high leverage/late and close in a diff convo, but strictly RISP: Bryce Harper 2023: 272/.803 2024: 331/ 1.122 2023 was a goofy year for Harper coming off of Tommy John. He looked good in April, but was a disaster in May/June before finishing the season on fire that year. I don't think he's a good case study for your example. Besides, I'm not talking singular player performance. I'm talking as a team which is far less susceptible to SSS and "chance". FWIW, I do think luck somewhat plays into this.  But let's look at this as a team. 1,298 AB with RISP for the O's this year. A 251 BA. Last year they hit 287. That's a 36 point difference. Yeah, only 3.6%. But let's look at what 3.6% means with that many AB. That means: 47 extra hits. I don't believe that 47 hits explains "luck" or "chance". Maybe for certain hitters in certain situations. There is an element of BABIP here. In 2024, it was 317. This year? 289. So, if we truly believe 300 is league average, they were a little unlucky this year, and somewhat lucky last year. But we are still talking about a dramatic dropoff. Now, is that because of playing more rookies this year? Because of the injuries? Very possibly. And in a 2 game series that can rear its ugly head. But there was nothing unlucky about yesterday or the day before. They just came up completely empty. Maybe the only unlucky situations were Ramon and Westy rips being caught.
    • I mentioned this once before but if you follow high end D1 softball the game has changed dramatically because the pitching is so dominate.  The theory is, you aren't going to score a bunch of runs by stringing singles together so most top programs only recruit athletes with game changing power or speed.  The speed aspect is important because you can turn a single into a double by stealing so now it only takes 2 hits to score a run instead of 3.   The O's lower minors seem to be stacked with guys that can steal bases so maybe that will be the change in philosophy moving forward.   It is just a thought but maybe the organization see's the pitching trend that is dominating because of the bullpen usage and OBP and runs scored across the board are down.  So stack your team with power and or speed and not much else matters.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...