Jump to content

Final grade for the Orioles’ 2022-23 offseason?


Frobby

Final grade for the Orioles 2022-23 offseason?  

98 members have voted

  1. 1. What’s your final grade for the O’s 2022-23 offseason?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 03/30/23 at 20:21

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

So, let's compare:

Kyle instead of Lyles-Probably upgrade

Irvin for whoever-upgrade

McCaan for backup catcher-upgrade

Frazier for Odor-upgrade

Other stuff-insignificant

The team has definitely been upgraded but we could have and should have done SO MUCH MORE!! We needed on premium bat and one premium starter.

Givens replacing Jorge Lopez - Huge downgrade.  I sure would love to have a guy that can throw a 99 mph sinker and get 6 outs, versus a back end lefty prospect.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gave a C, with it being more of a C-/D+.  The Frazier move has never made sense.  But they did upgrade, albeit marginally, at SP and backup C.  But this was a missed opportunity, with the payroll as low as it is, to really sign or trade for some difference makers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

Probably the best thing that can be said Is that Elias didn’t make any moves that will hamstring the team long term.....I will now root for the Orioles to prove me completely wrong.  

I don't think those "hamstring" moves are even in his DNA, he is a draft and develop guy. Maybe he can grow into "significant FA acquisition" EVP but I don't think JA will give him that much rope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted C, but in hindsight it's probably more of a D. The team's lack of activity in the free agent pitching market, especially given the fact how the Gray-Rod situation played out, is pretty unforgivable (and indefensible). And I still don't understand the strategy behind the Adam Frazier signing. It's like the Spider-Man meme with four or five rostered players pointing at each other. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

D-.

Got a good backup catcher, a couple maybe decent rotation pieces, Givens and Frazier. 
 

I’m not sure how much better we got, if any. It’s clear we’re looking for big steps from the young talent…which is fine, that was going to have to happen. But they didn’t bolster them with enough talent, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A month ago I would've said C-. After spring training I'm at D+, but that might be a bit harsh.

I'm not relatively okay with the free agent situation. The Frazier signing wasn't good, but the others are fine. And while we could use a good starter, I see the dollar amounts, years, and ages of this year's signings and none of them seem like good deals.

Here's a recent pitcher ranking list: https://theathletic.com/4328582/2023/03/23/mlb-aces-project-pitcher-rankings/

Bassitt is listed at #42 there, at the tier of not-quite-a-#3-starter. Eovaldi is not listed in the top 50. Those were probably the two most reasonable candidates, and you can make an argument that Eovaldi would be fine at that price, but it's not like he has been reliable in his career. Those contracts could easily turn out to end with a year much worse than the Frazier deal. And the Orioles' history of free agent SP signings has not been good.

Where I do wish more had happened:

- trading one of the surplus infielders

- trading prospects for immediate talent

I like the Irvin deal, but I'd like to see something bigger to get an impact SP. The pipeline is stacked, we can't keep them all down the line, and we can afford to lose 1-2 from our top 10. I'd prefer that to overpaying on a multi-year deal to a pitcher in his 30s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, spiritof66 said:

D for putting together a good ballclub for the fans.

B+ for saving money for for the owner.

I wonder if Elias and Sig get part of the upside?  Anyone know if it is typical for management in baseball to get some kind of “promote” or “carried interest” style compensation based on achievement of certain return thresholds for the ownership group?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
    • Let's go Tampa! Actually, I'm fired up for the offseason.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...