Jump to content

What do you think Ohtani gets next year?


Gurgi

Recommended Posts

With being a Unicorn it seems very hard to set a contract number for Ohtani.  I heard some people suggesting 700 million.  I personally can not see it.  I think I am more scared of an injury ruining the whole thing.  I guess some club is going to break the bank on him this off season.  

What do you think he gets?  10 years 500 million?  10 year 700 million?

What clubs can even afford that?  Maybe the LA teams.  The NY teams.  SF?  I know Seattle is interested.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

500+ million.

250 million for a great hitter, 250 million for a great pitcher.  Roll it all up into one.

Certainly there's concern with what would happen if he were to get hurt but he looks like he takes great care of himself.  He's a once in a lifetime player...only guy like that in baseball history.  He might spark off a two-way player revolution of sorts but it'll probably be awhile before we see anyone do it as good or better.  

Someone will give him that money and not have to think very hard to do it.  I bet there are teams that have been waiting 2+ years to figure out how to afford him and get themselves in a position to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

500+ million.

250 million for a great hitter, 250 million for a great pitcher.  Roll it all up into one.

Certainly there's concern with what would happen if he were to get hurt but he looks like he takes great care of himself.  He's a once in a lifetime player...only guy like that in baseball history.  He might spark off a two-way player revolution of sorts but it'll probably be awhile before we see anyone do it as good or better.  

Someone will give him that money and not have to think very hard to do it.  I bet there are teams that have been waiting 2+ years to figure out how to afford him and get themselves in a position to do so.

Pretty stupid thinking if you ask me.  If anyone has proven that one superstar doesn’t make a great team, it’s Ohtani.  In fact, he’s proved that two superstars (him and Trout) don’t make a great team.  Bottom line, it’s a bad idea to wrap up 25% of your payroll for a decade into one player.   Now if you’re one of the 3-4 teams where $50 mm isn’t 25% of your payroll, maybe it’s okay.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Pretty stupid thinking if you ask me.  If anyone has proven that one superstar doesn’t make a great team, it’s Ohtani.  In fact, he’s proved that two superstars (him and Trout) don’t make a great team.  Bottom line, it’s a bad idea to wrap up 25% of your payroll for a decade into one player.   Now if you’re one of the 3-4 teams where $50 mm isn’t 25% of your payroll, maybe it’s okay.  

No one asked you. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he’s going to get $600M. Teams gave out a few stupid 13 year contracts to players at or near 40 last offseason (Trea Turner, Bogaerts) and someone will do the same for Ohtani. 13/600 is about $46m per. Someone will do it. 
 

This assumes he goes max contract. It’s possible he takes less as someone above points out. But that doesn’t seem to happen very often (as far as we can know) so we’ll see. As OP noted he’s a true unicorn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fiver6565 said:

I think he’s going to get $600M. Teams gave out a few stupid 13 year contracts to players at or near 40 last offseason (Trea Turner, Bogaerts) and someone will do the same for Ohtani. 13/600 is about $46m per. Someone will do it. 
 

This assumes he goes max contract. It’s possible he takes less as someone above points out. But that doesn’t seem to happen very often (as far as we can know) so we’ll see. As OP noted he’s a true unicorn. 

Edit: at or near 30 is of course what I meant. Not 40. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know he's a superstar, but I really don't think he gets much past $400mm over 10 years, maybe with some club options tacked on that in writing make it $500mm overall if they pick them up. I just really can't see it. The Mets and Padres are watching their teams full of superstars burn down, and Steve Cohen was probably the best shot at $500+ and he might be once-bitten, twice shy at this point. Shohei may be a year late to the paycheck party. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
On 8/5/2023 at 6:06 PM, Gurgi said:

With being a Unicorn it seems very hard to set a contract number for Ohtani.  I heard some people suggesting 700 million.  I personally can not see it.  I think I am more scared of an injury ruining the whole thing.  I guess some club is going to break the bank on him this off season.  

What do you think he gets?  10 years 500 million?  10 year 700 million?

What clubs can even afford that?  Maybe the LA teams.  The NY teams.  SF?  I know Seattle is interested.  

 

 

$700 mil ended up being right on the money. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...