Jump to content

How Coaches Decide the Batting Order


Idaho_OriolesFan

Recommended Posts

What's the benefits of putting a batter in a certain position one game and elsewhere during another? Ie. I see Mullins bat in all sorts of different order.
Are they just "trying" different things? Do they decide depending on the opposing pitcher? When I played ball as a kid, we pretty much had our starting lineup and it really didn't change much.

Thanks for helping me learn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's have an analytics department that goes over the lineup before each game and determines the best lineup. I noticed Rutschman has been hitting first alot recently, probably because of his high walk totals. They aren't batting Mateo first thats for sure, he's almost always hitting 9th when he plays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume, like jabba72, that the analytics department helps with these decisions.

But in the end, the difference between the most and least logical lineups can be measured in a few handfuls of runs over a season. So as long as they come up with something halfway reasonable it's essentially indistinguishable from any other choice. Especially in a world with no DH, where you don't have to worry about an .089 hitter in the lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Idaho_OriolesFan said:

What's the benefits of putting a batter in a certain position one game and elsewhere during another? Ie. I see Mullins bat in all sorts of different order.
Are they just "trying" different things? Do they decide depending on the opposing pitcher? When I played ball as a kid, we pretty much had our starting lineup and it really didn't change much.

Thanks for helping me learn

It is probably a litttle different based on the club and how much authority each Manager has to make the lineup. But many factors play into it. Matchups against certain pitchers both from a side of the plate match up and "stuff". Hitter's strengths and how they are currently hitting. Lots of analytics. A manager's hunch. Even the conventional way of making a lineup has changed. Used to be your best hitter was in the 3 spot. Now most are in the 2 spot and some are even at 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

The O's have an analytics department that goes over the lineup before each game and determines the best lineup. I noticed Rutschman has been hitting first alot recently, probably because of his high walk totals. They aren't batting Mateo first thats for sure, he's almost always hitting 9th when he plays. 

Are you saying that the analytics department determines the lineup or that they give data to the manager? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

Are you saying that the analytics department determines the lineup or that they give data to the manager? 

Eve Rosenbaum suggested in an interview Frobby posted awhile back that Hyde makes the final decision, but that a lineup is given to him every day. I dont know if he's strongly encouraged to follow it, but I'd guess he uses it at least once in awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

Eve Rosenbaum suggested in an interview Frobby posted awhile back that Hyde makes the final decision, but that a lineup is given to him every day. I dont know if he's strongly encouraged to follow it, but I'd guess he uses it at least once in awhile.

Okay, that make more sence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

Eve Rosenbaum suggested in an interview Frobby posted awhile back that Hyde makes the final decision, but that a lineup is given to him every day. I dont know if he's strongly encouraged to follow it, but I'd guess he uses it at least once in awhile.

I believe this is the interview. However, the process she describes is more about the sit/start decisions. Pretty sure Hyde makes out the actual order. Aside from alternating LHB/RHB as much as possible, I don't see much rhyme or reason to it. It's more art than science and highly debatable how much difference the order makes aside from generally putting better players higher in the order to make sure they get that extra AB. 

https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/the-verge/episodes/Episode-150-w-Eve-Rosenbaum-e229acq/a-a6mduam

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as the lineup order stays within common sense I can see a small benefit coming from everybody not getting dull out of habit or thinking that lineup order requires a change in approach. I also think the same holds true for all the position changes from day to day although there are other benefits to position flexibility.   In other words whatever to keep everybody on their toes over the course of a long season. 

Just a pet theory with no scientific evidence…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I don't believe Mike Torrez fits the category of being past his prime when he was with the Orioles. He pitched only one season for Baltimore.  All he did that year was start 36 games, completing 16 of them, pitching a total of 270 2/3 innings and going 20-9 with an ERA of 3.06.  He would go on to pitch another nine seasons in the majors and win another 104 games before he was done.
    • Hitting, defense, and offensive depth were three of the things I was least worried about going into the season and then by the end of it, they were all I could think about.  I'm a lot more skeptical of the coaching than I usually am when things are going wrong.  The team seemed to completely lose focus, took a ton of poor hitting approaches.  I think a very young team is great but they needed something or someone to make them gel and keep a competitive spirit. And that's why, I'm calling it now, our biggest offseason signing will be bench coach Michael Jordan.
    • Blake Snell is an FA. So is our own Corbin Burnes. Here are some other FAs - Pete Alonso, Alex Bregman, Nathan Eovalidi, (possibly) Gerrit Cole, Rhys Hoskins,Marcell Ozuna, Max Fried, Ryan Pressly, Shane Bieber, Willy Adames, Justin Turner, David Robertson, Christian Walker, Walker Buehler, Tanner Scott, Freddy Peralta, Jurickson Profar and of course Juan Soto. Just to name some of the guys who may be able to help us. **These names are all according to spotrac.**
    • Game 2 was officially the lowest home playoff attendance at Camden Yards ever.
    • Criticizing Hyde’s pitching decisions in the series holds very little water in my opinion. He let Burnes go 8+, which is what you do with an ace who is dealing. He let Eflin only go twice through the lineup and took him out when matchup appropriate, which is what you do with a mid-rotation guy who doesn’t really have his A stuff. And he then piecemealed his way through Game 2, which is what you do when you have a bunch of mostly interchangeable relievers who all have platoon splits against a lineup that also has fairly significant platoon splits.  All of it worked. 3 runs allowed in 2 games will be hands down the second-best pitching performance in the WC round. The pitchers and the deployment were not the problem. They were not even a problem. The biggest mistake Hyde made in the series became even bigger because he repeated it again today. Pitching to Witt with a runner on 3rd and a base open was inexcusable. And he did it twice. It’s the kind of thing that a casual fan on a couch knows you can’t possibly do against a team like KC — you cannot let Bobby Witt Jr. beat you. And we did. Twice. They have a bona side superstar and then a few other good players. We absolutely had the ability to take him out of the game. And we just chose not to. Beyond that, I think not having McCann bunt in the 3rd inning of Game 1 was the biggest mistake. I hate bunting as a general rule, but McCann was always going to be a massive K risk against Ragans. Taking a smaller but more “guaranteed” positive outcome seems like a better choice than praying that somehow McCann gets a knock off Ragans. I get the critique of letting Cowser hit. I don’t think I could have brought myself to do it, and I don’t believe most managers could have either. But I get the rationale and I can’t really argue too much with it.
    • Crushing for a Lego enthusiast. He had a good year.      The team will disappoint if Adley and Gunnar don't do more in these spots. I think we'll mostly be happy if Holliday and Mayo in '25, and Basallo in '26 can play as well as Cowser in '24, minus the clutch kryptonite.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...