Jump to content

TT: It's still a great time to be an Orioles fan


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Uli2001 said:

The playoff loss will be felt until the playoffs are over. After that, fans will get over it and start looking forward to next season.

I will never be completely over it, but 95% of it is behind me already.   

Great OP by @Tony-OHsummarizing why the team is in a great position for the foreseeable future.  Now it’s up to Elias to figure out how best to move the team to the next level.   
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good take and very much where I am at as well. We always kinda suspected that we were playing a bit over our heads. The grind of 162 games and dependence on unproven young players eventually caught up with us. But this is a very good team with an excellent core and reinforcements on the way.

I do hope that we will make some more aggressive moves this offseason and next trade deadline. Not necessarily "all in" but at least some aggressive moves to improve the team, whether costing dollars or prospects, and/or extending Gunnar. Elias has always said the ultimate objective is to win a World Series, not just to compete. Well, that opportunity is here.

I wish only that my confidence in the management would extend to the ownership. Will 100 wins and a taste of the playoffs convince the ownership to remove some of the constraints Elias appears to be operating under? We may have a bright future, but it's in spite of the ownership, not because of it. Get the ownership on board and we could really have liftoff. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, we will take a major step back. Some veterans will be gone, the clubhouse chemistry will not be the same and there will be dependence on too many young prospects who won't live up to the hype. We will see the same trajectory of the '20 - '23 Chicago White Sox.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Unfortunately, we will take a major step back. Some veterans will be gone, the clubhouse chemistry will not be the same and there will be dependence on too many young prospects who won't live up to the hype. We will see the same trajectory of the '20 - '23 Chicago White Sox.

Are you this much of a delight in real life?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Good take and very much where I am at as well. We always kinda suspected that we were playing a bit over our heads. The grind of 162 games and dependence on unproven young players eventually caught up with us. But this is a very good team with an excellent core and reinforcements on the way.

I do hope that we will make some more aggressive moves this offseason and next trade deadline. Not necessarily "all in" but at least some aggressive moves to improve the team, whether costing dollars or prospects, and/or extending Gunnar. Elias has always said the ultimate objective is to win a World Series, not just to compete. Well, that opportunity is here.

I wish only that my confidence in the management would extend to the ownership. Will 100 wins and a taste of the playoffs convince the ownership to remove some of the constraints Elias appears to be operating under? We may have a bright future, but it's in spite of the ownership, not because of it. Get the ownership on board and we could really have liftoff. 

Nothing to argue with here from me. This will be an interesting offseason to see how Elias and maybe more importantly, ownership react to being legitimately set up compete next season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Now, if we could just get a new owner

It would certainly be the best news we could all get, but at the same time, not realistic unfortunately. It's always a gray cloud over the fandom. 

But this is about being positive. We have a great GM, and very good manager/coaching staff and an organization that is very healthy and not up against an end date.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Good take and very much where I am at as well. We always kinda suspected that we were playing a bit over our heads. The grind of 162 games and dependence on unproven young players eventually caught up with us. But this is a very good team with an excellent core and reinforcements on the way.

I do hope that we will make some more aggressive moves this offseason and next trade deadline. Not necessarily "all in" but at least some aggressive moves to improve the team, whether costing dollars or prospects, and/or extending Gunnar. Elias has always said the ultimate objective is to win a World Series, not just to compete. Well, that opportunity is here.

I wish only that my confidence in the management would extend to the ownership. Will 100 wins and a taste of the playoffs convince the ownership to remove some of the constraints Elias appears to be operating under? We may have a bright future, but it's in spite of the ownership, not because of it. Get the ownership on board and we could really have liftoff. 

I'm looking forward to the future, but like you my excitement is tempered by JA's potential to wreck a good thing. We don't even need the Orioles to spend huge money in comparison to what larger market teams do in free agency.

Will Elias be afforded the latitude to get a TOR caliber starting pitcher and supplement the bullpen with more depth. Elias has done a nice job with waiver wire pickups and trading for undervalued pitchers, but settling for Webb and Fuji to bolster the bullpen wasn't enough to really position the team for a World Series run.

I want to see Elias get a starter that isn't just next season's Kyle Gibson and not settle for waiver wire or trade throw-in's to fill out the bullpen.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could go any number of ways from here, but pretty much all of them involve mostly good baseball being played in the next several years. I'm sure there will be tons of references this winter, like we've already seen in this thread, to teams like the 2020s White Sox and Blue Jays that looked primed for years of greatness and have yet to see an ALCS. And definitely, that could happen, though I think the O's are better set up than those teams were. 

Elias' previous project, the Astros, reached the playoffs in 2015, a bit earlier than expected after their very deep tank/rebuild. They lost the ALDS to KC after beating the Yankees in the WC game. They lost the series despite being up 6-2 at home, in the 8th inning, in what could have been a series-winning Game 4. The most pivotal play in that loss was an error by 20 year old, soon to by Rookie of the Year shortstop, Carlos Correa.

The year after that, they did regress slightly, finishing 3rd in the West and missing the playoffs. 

The year after that, they won the World Series. They've been to at least the ALCS in every year since. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

It would certainly be the best news we could all get, but at the same time, not realistic unfortunately. It's always a gray cloud over the fandom. 

But this is about being positive. We have a great GM, and very good manager/coaching staff and an organization that is very healthy and not up against an end date.

No doubt..just saying that the new owner would complete everything for the fan base.

Love where this team is headed, no doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

It would certainly be the best news we could all get, but at the same time, not realistic unfortunately. It's always a gray cloud over the fandom. 

But this is about being positive. We have a great GM, and very good manager/coaching staff and an organization that is very healthy and not up against an end date.

And don't forget though the owner doesn't spend a bunch of money he seems to let the GM do what he thinks is correct within the constraints of the budget.  Tons of owners don't do this.  Personally, I would rather have this type of owner with the Elias regime than one willing to spend more money but who interferes with Elias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, baltfan said:

And don't forget though the owner doesn't spend a bunch of money he seems to let the GM do what he thinks is correct within the constraints of the budget.  Tons of owners don't do this.  Personally, I would rather have this type of owner with the Elias regime than one willing to spend more money but who interferes with Elias.

Tons?

I can think of two that we have evidence of working like this, Moreno and Reinsdorf.  Maybe Cohen and Seidler.

I think most owners prefer to stay out of it.
 

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent voice of reason Tony. There really hasn’t been a period of time since the last WS win where the future of the Orioles and the state of the franchise were better. 
 

Today is a sad day because we wake up without another game on the schedule. And it hurts because this team looked ready to go further. But today is also a reminder that the playoffs are a crapshoot and that being in it, having a ticket to the playoffs, gives you a chance. 
 

Our young team got a taste and also a reality check about the playoffs. Hopefully it serves the core well. Makes them hungry for more and brings them back in the spring with a chip on the shoulder. 
 

A final point…the rebuild is clearly over and Elias gets an A+. Now we will be grading him on keeping the Orioles relevant and improving our odds in future post seasons. None of us knows how or if he can do this, but if he does nearly as well as he did getting here there are plenty of good times ahead. 
 

For that, I am thankful. And also thankful for what you provide Tony. It has been without a doubt a hell of a good year. And it’s been great to be here for all of it!

Carry on!

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...