Jump to content

Ryan Mountcastle 2024


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, emmett16 said:

Will Mounty finally top .800 this year?  
 

 

Me too.  I don’t take too much from 35 games played, though. 
 

It really does paint a picture of this year’s run suppression when you see his OPS is .042 lower than 2020 while his OPS+ is 5 points higher.  
 

I love that his avg EV, HardH%, and Oppo% are all at career highs.  His BB % is at a career low but so are his Whiff%, Chase%, and K%.  
 

It looks to me like has improved a bit and is becoming the best possible version of himself.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2021: .713 OPS at 62 team games; subsequent low .687 (game 65); subsequent high .821 (game 132); final OPS .796.

2022: .725 OPS at 62 team games; subsequent low .709 (game 129); subsequent high .826 (game 80); final OPS .729.

2023: .686 OPS at 62 team games; subsequent low .688 game 90)( subsequent high .807 (game 130); final OPS .779.

Mountcastle is currently at .830 after 62 games.   That is more than 100 points higher than he’s ever been at this point in a season.  To this point in his career, he’s always finished the season higher than he was after 62 games (+.083, +.004, +.093, despite a bit of a roller coaster to get there.  

Last year, game 62 was his last game before he went on the IL with vertigo.  He was at his absolute nadir.   What a difference a year makes.  

I have little doubt that Mounty will experience a serious slump at some point this year, but he’s in a great position to have the best season of his career right now.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

2021: .713 OPS at 62 team games; subsequent low .687 (game 65); subsequent high .821 (game 132); final OPS .796.

2022: .725 OPS at 62 team games; subsequent low .709 (game 129); subsequent high .826 (game 80); final OPS .729.

2023: .686 OPS at 62 team games; subsequent low .688 game 90)( subsequent high .807 (game 130); final OPS .779.

Mountcastle is currently at .830 after 62 games.   That is more than 100 points higher than he’s ever been at this point in a season.  To this point in his career, he’s always finished the season higher than he was after 62 games (+.083, +.004, +.093, despite a bit of a roller coaster to get there.  

Last year, game 62 was his last game before he went on the IL with vertigo.  He was at his absolute nadir.   What a difference a year makes.  

I have little doubt that Mounty will experience a serious slump at some point this year, but he’s in a great position to have the best season of his career right now.  

Hes actually a little farther along this year as average ops is down,just hope the slump does not last too long, he is way more fun when he goes good. Can really get on youre nerves when he isn't though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Best season of his career?  Who would have guessed that?!?!?  😄

Thank you.  It looks like it was me.

RZNJ

Plus Member

 31.8k

Author

Posted January 15

  On 1/15/2024 at 9:33 AM,  wildbillhiccup said:

Wouldn't it make more sense to trade Mountcastle, who actually has some trade value, and give the majority of 1B ABs to Kjerstad who has nothing left to prove at AAA? Then just just O'Hearn as a spot starter or a fall back plan if Kjerstad struggles? 

1.  I think Mountcastle is primed for his best year.

2. From what I saw, Kjerstad is not a 1B.

3. Santander can be the backup 1B.

4. If Kjerstad struggles, Mayo, Cowser, Norby.

 

P.S. I wasn’t going to prematurely pat myself on the back like others do at every opportunity but since someone else tried to (surprise! surprise!) why not.

Edited by RZNJ
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, waroriole said:

He was due a breakout year at some point. Let’s not ruin it by patting ourselves on the back. 

No question. He has been hitting into bad luck for a few years. That’s a big reason why I have thought this is his career year. At some point, the luck has to change.

It’s also why I wouldn’t keep him.  Let someone else buy into this being a career renaissance. And who knows, if he got out of OPACY, perhaps an 800+ OpS would become more of the norm for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were prior years more bad luck?  Or this year more a career year?  (Taking away the both option)

Feels like prior years were more heavily influenced by "bad luck" and this year matches expectations a bit more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No question. He has been hitting into bad luck for a few years. That’s a big reason why I have thought this is his career year. At some point, the luck has to change.

It’s also why I wouldn’t keep him.  Let someone else buy into this being a career renaissance. And who knows, if he got out of OPACY, perhaps an 800+ OpS would become more of the norm for him?

If we were to trade him in The off season, what sort of return could he command assuming he stays on this current path?

I believe after this year he has two years remaining of club control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

Were prior years more bad luck?  Or this year more a career year?  (Taking away the both option)

Feels like prior years were more heavily influenced by "bad luck" and this year matches expectations a bit more.

He’s not that much better than his career numbers and his walk rate is as low as ever.   A little bit premature to declare this a career year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

He’s not that much better than his career numbers and his walk rate is as low as ever.   A little bit premature to declare this a career year.

 That's the vibe I get when reading some posts.  I look at his 2024 stats as expected.  And a quality 1B option thru the arb years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

He’s not that much better than his career numbers and his walk rate is as low as ever.   A little bit premature to declare this a career year.

Hes actually quite a bit better than expected. His OPS+ is way up, His defense WAR is his best. It is premature to declare this his best year only because the rest of year has not happened yet. Who Knows maybe today is his last game this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • ??? The only sports where people peak younger than 20 is stuff like womens gymnastics and figure skating, where women have to delay puberty in order to maintain a body type ideal for the sport.  Nearly every other sport's athletes between 22-27.
    • Ok several of you want to compare JH to Gunnar.  I am happy to do so: JH is 20 years old and has a .909 OPS at AAA after putting up a .941 OPS as a 19 year old at four levels. As a 20 year old Gunnar had a .826 OPS across three levels, .944 at A, .775 at A+ and .561 at AA (5 games) Even at 21 Gunnar went back to AA for almost half a season and his OPS at AA was .894 I am not saying JH will be as good as Gunnar but people saying we should trade for some pitcher we could have for a year or two have lost touch with common sense.
    • To be honest i wont know.  I know im in the absolute minority here but when the robo umps show up, im outa here.  Im barely hanging on now due to the recent rule changes the last few years.  Baseball and football has changed so much lately ive really lost interest.  I actually just cancelled Fubo just so i can save some money.    
    • That's a good point as an OF I read swings but it's different on dirt.  I could freeze knowing my speed would make up for a poor read-no time to do that on dirt.  There was more time to think in the OF which was good and bad. To your second point- I didn't think about it until now but in my coaching experience some kids-the really good OF's were just flat out better at tracking balls than others-combination of eyesight and instincts-not sure but you brought up a good point.   JH would likely be an plus CF given what we know about him but it will take reps otherwise you're giving up outs and advances.  FWIW-Slotting JH into CF would run somewhat counter intuitive to drafting EBJ and Josenberger (who really only provide value in CF) in the last draft.  
    • I understand but again a contending team is not going to trade a good pitcher for someone who can leave the team end of year. 
    • First of all, pretty much everyone that wears an MLB uniform is a good enough athlete to play just about any sport to at least a d3 collegiate level, and likely d1, Holliday included.  The only exceptions would be people that have hard size limitations.  (e.g. Corbin Carroll or Jose Altuve are unlikely to be football players simply due to their size.  And Altuve isn't going to cut it in basketball for the same reason.)  But for sports like skateboarding or any swing sports like tennis or golf?  I guarantee JH could be a high level college athlete if not a pro player if he focused on them.  If you're arguing that Gunnar has athleticism/body control that's elite even among MLB standards, and Holliday doesn't.... maybe I'd agree with you?  But Gunnar is always going to have his arm tool over Holliday.  In my limited time viewing Holliday, I'd actually rate Holliday's body control to be better than Gunnar's, but a large part of that is because Gunnar is 6'4" 220, and Holliday is 6' 190.  I'd also say that Gunnar having the body control and athleticism he has given his size is pretty exceptional, so if you want to bring up his combination of size and athleticism/body control, I'd agree with you.   But you're coming off like Uncle Rico in Napoleon Dynamite, while implying that someone who's like 89th percentile sprint speed isn't an elite athlete even among other MLB players, and that is just outlandish to me.   
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...