Jump to content

Yennier Cano 2024


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

At least he looks strong again this year.

During Arizona fall league, the folks from Pitcher List gave a presentation on pitch-level value, a readout they developed that is probably broadly similar to Stuff+, just with some inputs Nick Pollack and his team likes to lean into.

Anyhow, that metric thinks Yennier Cano is one of baseball's best pitchers so far this season.    I think for the org Kimbrel had a contain Cano costs angle, and it'd be efficient if he didn't get Saves, but...

https://pitcherlist.com/plv-leaderboard/

Baby steps after a few days rest, Suarez should be out there when the first SP returns, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him enter the mix if Kimbrel needs some down time.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cano can't be trusted as a closer either. We saw that last year. The Orioles are going to lose a lot of close heartbreakers this year, that is all. I think they are still good enough to win 88-90 games if everything else goes right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not as convinced of Cano's inability to handle the 9th. I know he had a poor performance there last year but I think there's a lot of noise in that signal. I would definitely go to Cano next for the closer role if Kimbrel is out for a while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Uli2001 said:

Cano can't be trusted as a closer either. We saw that last year. The Orioles are going to lose a lot of close heartbreakers this year, that is all. I think they are still good enough to win 88-90 games if everything else goes right.

Just a couple weeks ago everyone was saying Kimbrel looks awesome. I think it is more about keeping everyone fresh but it's tough to do on a 100 win pace with tons of close games. What I don't understand is why we aren't using the taxi squad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Just a couple weeks ago everyone was saying Kimbrel looks awesome. I think it is more about keeping everyone fresh but it's tough to do on a 100 win pace with tons of close games. What I don't understand is why we aren't using the taxi squad. 

Kimbrel and Coulombe can't be sent down.  Bauman, Webb and Ramirez are out of options.  That leaves Cano, Akin and Tate. 

It's a bullpen that isn't built to use the Taxi squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Kimbrel and Coulombe can't be sent down.  Bauman, Webb and Ramirez are out of options.  That leaves Cano, Akin and Tate. 

It's a bullpen that isn't built to use the Taxi squad.

Yep, and Elias knew this going into the season. I would have attempted to move a few of these guys with no options for similar guys with maybe less experience, but with options. 

Then again, not sure how many teams will be knocking down the waiver wire to get Webb or Baumann.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Kimbrel and Coulombe can't be sent down.  Bauman, Webb and Ramirez are out of options.  That leaves Cano, Akin and Tate. 

It's a bullpen that isn't built to use the Taxi squad.

Ramirez should be gone. Tate and Akin have options. Those are three spots that could be used for other optionable guys. I think Vespi is the only one currently on the 400 man, however. Still I would expect to have seen him by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

Ramirez should be gone. Tate and Akin have options. Those are three spots that could be used for other optionable guys. I think Vespi is the only one currently on the 400 man, however. Still I would expect to have seen him by now.

Can’t option Akin.  He has been good except one outing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, baltfan said:

Can’t option Akin.  He has been good except one outing. 

It's what you do to manage rest. We could get by without him for 10 days and then he would be back. It's not like position players were optioning is a demotion. But I agree, he has been pretty good so I would get rid of Ramirez and option Tate first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

It's what you do to manage rest. We could get by without him for 10 days and then he would be back. It's not like position players were optioning is a demotion. But I agree, he has been pretty good so I would get rid of Ramirez and option Tate first.

He just is too important to the pen at this point. I don’t think you could withstand optioning him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, baltfan said:

He just is too important to the pen at this point. I don’t think you could withstand optioning him.  

It's good he's pitching well but let's not go crazy.    The job he's done the previous 10 days could/would be taken by Albert Suarez, Cole Irvin or Cionel Perez over the next 10 days.    None of those four pitchers really move the needle as a guy a strong staff needs all 26 weeks.

That hypothetical was really just more if he went a 3rd or 4th inning today.    He's perhaps down tomorrow, but I'd bet he like pretty much every reliever on staff pitches twice in the next four games through Thursday afternoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I’m about to pst this in Roy’s thread, but makes sense to share here.

Dump Webb, Ramirez, and Baumann.

Replace with Wells, Suarez, and Povich.

Wells isn’t back for a few more days, so Bradish and Means can come back without requiring an immediate corresponding dump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Gibson signed very early in the offseason and was never really a true option of being brought back by Elias and co. If you want to go with someone they could have actually signed for depth then Michael Lorenzen would of made sense as a swingman as he had to wait forever to finally get a deal and it was a bargain for Texas at 4mill. Even then, would he have been fine signing here as a non guaranteed starter; hard to say but don’t think there was any attempt on the O’s to do so.
    • The Britton trade allowed the Yankees to trade some guys that would have been subjected to the 40 man crunch (Tate for example).
    • You can get Pit/PA here. Scroll down to the Team Pitches Batting section and sort by Pit/PA. Lots of good stuff on that page.
    • It will be interesting to see if a small July trade occurs in the style of the Rays or Dodgers with stuffed 40-man rosters. Michael Busch and Bryan Hudson having been guys the Dodgers moved along last winter for off 40 man types is a level  no one else is at, but if Orioles PD success rate stays high they may get closer than most of the other 29 clubs.    How many real keepers are on Delmarva right now?     How many of McDermott, Young, Johnson, Bright, De Leon, Baumeister, Forret, etc. become full time Orioles?
    • It’s a good trade deadline question. It’s not super common, but looking ahead at 40-man roster crunch does affect the prospects who become available for teams with really deep 40-man rosters and strong upper level minors systems. For example, it almost certainly played a role in the Rays trading Seth Johnson. More recently, the Dodgers had some 40-man crunch this off-season and that motivated a handful of trades.  However, I don’t think the Orioles are to that point. They still have enough 40-man space for the prospects who will clearly need to be added.
    • Correct.  I was never a big Mountcastle guy but I didn’t, to the best of my knowledge, say he wouldn’t make it, just that he wouldn’t be an 800-900 OPS type of guy.  Mountcastle’s hit tool (.293 minor league avg) has allowed him to overcome his chase tendencies.  Stowers (.263 minor league avg), I don’t believe, has as good a hit tool.  He’s going to have to hit 25+ homers, minimum, to be a .780 hitter.   He’s capable of it.  I’m just not as confident about it as you are.  I think he’s looked good both ways.  
    • Interesting.. I wonder if he could improve a bit by switching to a more aggressive approach, similar to the evolution Gunnar made last year. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...