Jump to content

Who will hit .290+ this season?


GotNitro

Who will hit .290+ this season (in Baltimore)  

566 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will hit .290+ this season (in Baltimore)



Recommended Posts

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply
So when you say he is a very good but not great hitter, do you mean he is not the absolute best player in baseball?

Last year, Nick was 10th in the league in BA, third in OBP, seventh in OPS, second in walks, and I can continue on.

How can anybody in his right mind not think that Nick Markakis is among the very best hitters in baseball? His power is emerging and he has yet to hit his prime. He hit the second most doubles in the AL last year, and doubles are a strong indicator on how well a hitter will do with extended power the following year.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/m/markani01.shtml

Oldfan, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

"Okay, a simple "wrong" would've done just fine"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the three spot he is not a 300 hitter. He probably is going to be close to that in the two spot though.

In the two spot last year he bat .345 so, by your "logic", he should be set up to contend for the AL batting title?

But he isn't a .300 hitter and not that good so I guess that won't happen?

Do you een understand how this stuff works?

Huff drives in more runs because he bats lower in the order, and Nick is usually on base when he gets those hits, therefore he drives in more runs.

And considering that Huff had his best season, well one of his best seasons ever last year to expect him to do that again is a bit foolish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So when you say he is a very good but not great hitter, do you mean he is not the absolute best player in baseball?

Last year, Nick was 10th in the league in BA, third in OBP, seventh in OPS, second in walks, and I can continue on.

How can anybody in his right mind not think that Nick Markakis is among the very best hitters in baseball? His power is emerging and he has yet to hit his prime.

Oldfan, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

To me a "great hitter" has to win at least more than one Batting Titles or consistently be in the top ten (usually near the top) on a yearly basis. A guy like Tony Gwynn comes to mind, or Rod Carew, or George Brett. Or going further back, Ted Williams. Markakis is not close to this type of hitter. If he does those things than I would consider him a great hitter. As of now, he is just very good period. Again, he's not even the best on a very bad Orioles team right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the three spot he is not a 300 hitter. He probably is going to be close to that in the two spot though. Some of you apparently don't know enough about the spots in the lineup to realize that the two hitter gets better pitches to hit than the three hitter, because they don't want to put him on base for the big boys that usually follow on most teams. It is basic Major League Baseball 101.

Do you really believe this? You don't think pitchers try to get all hitters out? That they choose to give the number 2 hitters better pitches to hit? Why would they want runners on base for the three hitter? Are they like you and don't realize that getting on base is the key to scoring runs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me a "great hitter" has to win at least more than one Batting Titles or consistently be in the top ten (usually near the top) on a yearly basis. A guy like Tony Gwynn comes to mind, or Rod Carew, or George Brett. Or going further back, Ted Williams. Markakis is not close to this type of hitter. If he does those things than I would consider him a great hitter. As of now, he is just very good period. Again, he's not even the best on a very bad Orioles team right now.

Ok, so Nick isn't as good a hitter as 4 of the greatest of all time...at least not yet.

Ok, I am ok with that.

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the two spot last year he bat .345 so, by your "logic", he should be set up to contend for the AL batting title?

But he isn't a .300 hitter and not that good so I guess that won't happen?

Do you een understand how this stuff works?

Huff drives in more runs because he bats lower in the order, and Nick is usually on base when he gets those hits, therefore he drives in more runs.

And considering that Huff had his best season, well one of his best seasons ever last year to expect him to do that again is a bit foolish.

I could ask the same question of you? Melvin Mora was better than Markis at hitting with RISP for a good part of the season and hence Trembley replaced Markais at the three spot in the order with Melvin. Furthermore, Huff does hit better batting in the heart of the lineup (three or four) than Markakis. He clearly out performed him in that spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me a "great hitter" has to win at least more than one Batting Titles or consistently be in the top ten (usually near the top) on a yearly basis. A guy like Tony Gwynn comes to mind, or Rod Carew, or George Brett. Or going further back, Ted Williams. Markakis is not close to this type of hitter. If he does those things than I would consider him a great hitter. As of now, he is just very good period. Again, he's not even the best on a very bad Orioles team right now.

So Eddie Murray wasn't a great hitter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me a "great hitter" has to win at least more than one Batting Titles or consistently be in the top ten (usually near the top) on a yearly basis. A guy like Tony Gwynn comes to mind, or Rod Carew, or George Brett. Or going further back, Ted Williams. Markakis is not close to this type of hitter. If he does those things than I would consider him a great hitter. As of now, he is just very good period. Again, he's not even the best on a very bad Orioles team right now.

I agree with you. Nick is not one of the five or ten best hitters in the history of baseball. All those posters who claim that he is, are delusional. I haven't seen anybody claim that, but if you have then I agree with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you really believe this? You don't think pitchers try to get all hitters out? That they choose to give the number 2 hitters better pitches to hit? Why would they want runners on base for the three hitter? Are they like you and don't realize that getting on base is the key to scoring runs?

They don't want runners on base, hence they don't want to WALK the two hitter as he usually isn't as much of a hitting threat as the THREE hitter.So they give him better pitches to hit. GET IT>?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me a "great hitter" has to win at least more than one Batting Titles or consistently be in the top ten (usually near the top) on a yearly basis. A guy like Tony Gwynn comes to mind, or Rod Carew, or George Brett. Or going further back, Ted Williams. Markakis is not close to this type of hitter. If he does those things than I would consider him a great hitter. As of now, he is just very good period. Again, he's not even the best on a very bad Orioles team right now.

He's been in the top 18 in BA for two of his three years in the majors!

Are you seriously that clueless?!

He is consistently excellent! And he is getting BETTER!

The lack or reasoning and logic to your arguments astounds me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been in the top 18 in BA for two of his three years in the majors!

Are you seriously that clueless?!

He is consistently excellent! And he is getting BETTER!

The lack or reasoning and logic to your arguments astounds me.

TOP 18 is VERY GOOD, but certainly a long way from EXCELLENT OR GREAT! That term is used for the top 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Actually looking at FG current Board, HK is among the highest speculatively tradable players.   Spencer Jones if the Yankees Yank.  De Paula for LAD.  Delauter on CLE.  (Extreme out of the money option: TBR did a big roster reshuffle selling and buying.  How fun would that be?!)
    • Which is also why so many good hitting kids in cold weather baseball/hockey states hit LH-because they were LW's in hockey.  
    • I guess your goal is to "Agitate, agitate, agitate"? If it gives you satisfaction to try to annoy people while saying 'look at me." Good luck with that! I feel sorry for you dude. I have showed a lot of restraint as it relates to you. But I stand on what I said as fact. I will acknowledge that I went against my better judgment in the first place by responding to you when I strongly suspected what you were trying to do. You got me...lol But now I'm done.  I hope that you get the attention and affirmation that you so desperately crave. There's better ways to go about it though. Good luck and God speed!  
    • They faced very good pitchers Saturday through Monday.  This isn’t a softball team you don’t throw your 9 best offensive players out there regardless of their ability to play defense.  The Orioles have  plenty of offense.  Mateo is also a way better defender than McCann.  
    • If he doesn’t struggle in the MLB earlier this year…is never called up, still in the minors, do you think you’d still feel the same?
    • Yep.  Now, I do agree with Tony talking about the twitchiness but that is also more important in football and basketball than it is baseball. A guy who was a great athlete was Chris Davis.  I didn’t want to re-sign him but honestly, I never would have thought he would drop off like he did considering how great a shape he was in, how well he moved and just how athletic he was. He didn’t have that body that said, you will burn out fast. It’s not about that in baseball.  Obviously, if you can be an amazing athlete and great at baseball things, like Gunnar, it puts you on a different level than basically everyone else..:but you don’t have to be that great athlete to be a great player.    And btw, even the guys we look at and say they lack athleticism, are still amazing athletes once they get to the highest levels. You can be some sloth like turd and become a pro athelte.
    • Traded for Bradish, traded for Irvin, traded for Burnes, traded for Flaherty, list can go on.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...