Jump to content

Ryan Flaherty - Losing his lock on 2B?


NCRaven

Recommended Posts

Most people have thought that Ryan Flaherty started camp as the front-runner for the starting secondbase position and (I thought) Buck had even said that Flaherty would work at 2B exclusively early in the pre-season. But, with his start at 3B today, Ryan will have played more games at SS and 3B than 2B this spring.

Is this a sign that the team is no longer confidant in Machado's availability for the start of the season?

Or a sign that they now see Flaherty as more of a utility player than starting 2B?

Or a sign that Schoop and Weeks have made the position much more competitive?

Or just random noise during the early part of spring training?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think Buck is thinking this way: Flaherty has already proven he can play a very good 2B, and probably doesn't need a full spring of reps to get ready. Meanhile, Buck needs to figure out what his options are going to be if Manny isn't ready by March 31, or if Hardy goes down with an injury or just needs a blow. So, getting Flaherty some reps and SS and 3B is only prudent, even though it's likely that Flaherty will mostly be at 2B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most people have thought that Ryan Flaherty started camp as the front-runner for the starting secondbase position and (I thought) Buck had even said that Flaherty would work at 2B exclusively early in the pre-season. But, with his start at 3B today, Ryan will have played more games at SS and 3B than 2B this spring.

Is this a sign that the team is no longer confidant in Machado's availability for the start of the season?

Or a sign that they now see Flaherty as more of a utility player than starting 2B?

Or a sign that Schoop and Weeks have made the position much more competitive?

Or just random noise during the early part of spring training?

Honesty, I never felt that Flash had the lock on 2nd, especially considering what they gave up for Weeks.

They like Flash being the super utility guy on the bench.

As for Schoop, he probably will be in AAA at the start of regular season, but getting time in 2nd, even in ST at this level, helps his growth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did the same thing last year. To me the thinking is that he is our backup SS and it's more valuable for him to get reps there in the spring than it is for him to play 2B where he is solid. The question is whether Weeks or Schoop can play themselves into a platoon role, or perhaps start the season as full time 2B if Flaherty shifts to 3B in the event that Manny is rehabbing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honesty, I never felt that Flash had the lock on 2nd, especially considering what they gave up for Weeks.

They like Flash being the super utility guy on the bench.

As for Schoop, he probably will be in AAA at the start of regular season, but getting time in 2nd, even in ST at this level, helps his growth.

Weeks was the throw-in in a salary dump. Barring injury Flaherty will be starting for us this year at second base imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weeks was the throw-in in a salary dump. Barring injury Flaherty will be starting for us this year at second base imo.

Probably, but I wouldn't undersell Weeks here. The guy did put up a full season at .761 OPS in 2011, and has a career .779 in AAA with good OBP skills. He could help us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don 't get our manager's pronouncement that Flaherty will get the starts at second base. It seems contrary to the way he's handled these situations in the past. That is he's been non-committal. I like Flaherty a lot and I don't mind him at second base. I just think he is more valuable to the team in other roles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably, but I wouldn't undersell Weeks here. The guy did put up a full season at .761 OPS in 2011, and has a career .779 in AAA with good OBP skills. He could help us.

Sure, he has upside. If Weeks can show that he can competently field I'd guess he'll be Flaherty's platoon partner at second. I have no idea what Flaherty's numbers are at this point but he looks pretty comfortable up there with his AB's imo. Nothing is a lock, but I'm pretty confident that Flaherty will be the starting second baseman and the moving him around stuff at this point is a contingency (i.e. Machado) and a way to look at other guys at second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weeks was the throw-in in a salary dump. Barring injury Flaherty will be starting for us this year at second base imo.

Baseball holds tight to the idea that trades can't be about money. That would be so unseemly, thought Mr. Kuhn.

I think the world would be a better and more honest place if you could, for example, just sell Jim Johnson to the A's if you wanted to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably, but I wouldn't undersell Weeks here. The guy did put up a full season at .761 OPS in 2011, and has a career .779 in AAA with good OBP skills. He could help us.

Thank you! I have been saying that...totally agree.

Good questions by NC Raven: makes me curious too...

My guess: Manny won't be ready. If so, I think AGon is the guy so I find it odd that Flaherty is playing there accept they are seriously considering keeping Jonathan as a starter at second. That is the only thing I can think of. I think Weeks has value but more in a platoon role, or at least to start the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you! I have been saying that...totally agree.

Good questions by NC Raven: makes me curious too...

My guess: Manny won't be ready. If so, I think AGon is the guy so I find it odd that Flaherty is playing there accept they are seriously considering keeping Jonathan as a starter at second. That is the only thing I can think of. I think Weeks has value but more in a platoon role, or at least to start the season.

Weeks isn't much of a SS/3B so if they want to look at him, it has to be at 2B. Flaherty can play anywhere so it doesn't matter. It isn't that Flaherty's job is in jeopardy, it's just that they need to give Weeks a good look.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weeks isn't much of a SS/3B so if they want to look at him, it has to be at 2B. Flaherty can play anywhere so it doesn't matter. It isn't that Flaherty's job is in jeopardy, it's just that they need to give Weeks a good look.

True and AGon is insurance in case Manny isn't ready to play for a few weeks.

Flash is the backup 3rd on the depth chart, and if he is starting 2nd, they move him and plug in the backup into 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • You should totally sue them. What gall they have to kinda, sorta imply that their baseball replays are accurate to the tenths of a second when they might not actually be that. That's exactly what leads to distrust of all institutions, chaos, revolution, and then we're living in some kind of post-apocalyptic hellscape, boiling our own shoes for the meager nutrition in the leather.
    • I think I used elite a little too loosely. Still, not a ton of hitters do better than 1:2 over a full season.
    • Baumeister threw 4.2 scoreless innings last night, 2 hits, 2 walks, 4 strikeouts.  He pounded the strike zone, throwing 49 strikes in 71 pitches.   In 14 innings spanning 4 outings, he’s got a 1.93 ERA, 1.36 WHIP, 11.6 K/9, 1.8 K/BB.  The walks have been high, 10 in 14 innings, but not crazy high for a guy just getting his feet wet.  Decent start for Baumeister. 
    • I always thought that if you weren't around 10:1 you weren't trying hard enough.
    • Adley was a nearly finished product when picked, if not for tradition and service time stuff he could have been in the majors shortly after he left college. Gunnar needed 1000+ minor league plate appearances as a high school pick. Ask this same question about the 1990-2017 Orioles with their development system. They certainly could have found a way to screw up Gunnar, would have been harder with Adley.
    • I don’t think it was weird at all.  EDC said it but I thought it unfolded as expected.  You knew the QBs would go. You knew tons of OT and WR would go.   This was always going to be an offense dominated first round. The Oline and WR depth is in every round. I suspect that they go Oline twice or Oline/WR tonight.  Obviously you never know how the board falls but I think that’s what is likely.   This is mainly going to be an offense draft. EDC said a few weeks ago that they will draft a RB.  My guess is that the RB goes sometime in day 3. They will come out of this draft with at least 2 more Olineman, one WR and one RB.  I suspect they take a safety at some point as well. The question will be do they take 9 players.  The Ravens didn’t feel this was a draft with as many draftable players as years past, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they make some kind of a trade. 
    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...