Jump to content

The Offense


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 633
  • Created
  • Last Reply
See. The latter part of this post is a really good response. Serves for much better discussion than not providing alternatives. Aoki was discussed quite a bit this offseason. Is he an upgrade? I think it's up for debate. And I accept that it's possible that they could add his salary. However, that would mean we wouldn't have one of De Aza, Young, Snider, or Paredes/Lough. Which one would be gone? Who loses playing time for him?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I hear ya. In that scenario, they would have added Aoki and not signed Snider. The defense and speed would have improved but the power would have taken a hit. For this team, I personally think Aoki would have been a better fit but we'll see how it plays out.

I think the Orioles liked the total package De Aza brings more than they liked Aoki.

True but they could have had both

No, power doesn't trump OBP. You could argue that a combination of (power + bad OBP) has a better price point than OBP. But not making outs is still the most important thing any batter can do.

I agree. I think the key is finding a mix of both

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear ya. In that scenario, they would have added Aoki and not signed Snider. The defense and speed would have improved but the power would have taken a hit. For this team, I personally think Aoki would have been a better fit but we'll see how it plays out.

True but they could have had both

I agree. I think the key is finding a mix of both

And who might that be?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of like what I'm seeing from the offense. We've scored at least 5 runs in 6 of the 7 games we've played. Certainly the power has been there. I feel like we've seen some patient at bats, too.

Lov'in Snyder's at bats he brings something we have NOT had a lot of, a good eye, and a patient bat ;)

He may be the anti Jones LOL (NOT picking on jonesy, he is who he is, and right now it's working)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

De Aza has 13 strike outs and 1 walk through 9 games. Pearce normally bats in the middle of the order and now you want him to bat 1st? Come on. Machado would be a reasonable option but I think he is better served batting where he has been.

That's my point, the O's don't have a leadoff guy on their roster now. Having a guy hit out of position like they did with Markakis is an option but it isn't necessarily the solution.

Why should we care how often De Aza strikes out? The only reason a strike out is considered worse than other kinds of outs is that you can't advance baserunners on a strikeout. But if it's the leadoff hitter, the presumption is he is leading off, not batting with runners on base. And if he is batting with runners on base, then he isn't leading off the inning. Therefore, I absolutely reject the idea that it's a problem if the leadoff hitter strikes out a lot, so long as his offense is OK otherwise.

Second, you can't cherry pick a couple of bad stats from nine games and pronounce them as part of a trend, and then ignore the more important good stats the player has compiled in those nine games. I'd gladly take 162 games from DeAza just like the games he has played so far (minus the dropped fly ball in the OF).

Right now the Orioles' leadoff hitters rank 3rd in BA, 5th in OBP, 2nd in SLG, 3rd in OPS, 1st in runs scored, and 4th in RBI in the American League. And you're worried about strikeouts? Give me a break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second, you can't cherry pick a couple of bad stats from nine games and pronounce them as part of a trend, and then ignore the more important good stats the player has compiled in those nine games.

Yeah, I didn't get a reply when I challenged him on that. Maybe you'll have better luck. De Aza's track record says he can take a walk.

Right now the Orioles' leadoff hitters rank 3rd in BA, 5th in OBP, 2nd in SLG, 3rd in OPS, 1st in runs scored, and 4th in RBI in the American League. And you're worried about strikeouts? Give me a break.

Yeah, no problem with De Aza leading off against RHP and a host of other candidates against LHP. I trust Buck to figure it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not the exact clip I am looking for but listen to what Dan says at the end of the clip.

Is the the clip you wanted? She did this too.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MrPmYXQ2UH8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why should we care how often De Aza strikes out? The only reason a strike out is considered worse than other kinds of outs is that you can't advance baserunners on a strikeout. But if it's the leadoff hitter, the presumption is he is leading off, not batting with runners on base. And if he is batting with runners on base, then he isn't leading off the inning. Therefore, I absolutely reject the idea that it's a problem if the leadoff hitter strikes out a lot, so long as his offense is OK otherwise.

Second, you can't cherry pick a couple of bad stats from nine games and pronounce them as part of a trend, and then ignore the more important good stats the player has compiled in those nine games. I'd gladly take 162 games from DeAza just like the games he has played so far (minus the dropped fly ball in the OF).

Right now the Orioles' leadoff hitters rank 3rd in BA, 5th in OBP, 2nd in SLG, 3rd in OPS, 1st in runs scored, and 4th in RBI in the American League. And you're worried about strikeouts? Give me a break.

Sorry, but I completely disagree with you. The Orioles have enough guys in their lineup that strikeout too much and/or swing at bad pitches. I don't care how the leadoff hitters rank through 9 games, the leadoff spot has been a hole for several years. De Aza was a nice addition and I'm glad the Orioles traded for him last year. However, like a lot of the other guys in the lineup, pitchers don't have to throw strikes to get him out

They are both left hand bats, and Aoki's defense has been suspect lately, as well as costing too much IMO.

Aoki is on a 1 year, $4.75 million contract. He would replace Snider so it doesn't matter that he is a lefty and the defense in the outfield would improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, I'm glad they didn't sign him. I like Snider better.

I do too.

Snider getting heat for 1 bad ball, but Buck also pointed out to another wind driven catch that he made late in the game, that people dont realize how hard it was to catch that.

Buck thinks Snider is a good OF, and so far, I am liking what I see from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Westburg batting #4 isn't your typical clean up hitter, but he does 2 things well enough that it's probably going to be consistently effective. 1. He has a high average with runners in scoring position. 2. If the 1st 3 batter fail, he'll be good at leading of the 2nd inning. Bonus: He's got some pop in his bat so once in a while he can do what traditional cleanup hitters do. I love how versatile and consistent Jordan Westburg is.
    • I hope we extend Henderson and Adley at the All-Star break this year. Rubenstein can show that the Orioles are sitting at the big boy table now. They are some of the best players in MLB and should be getting paid.       
    • To me, it's more about offensive inconsistency game to game. I don't do the research that many others on here do, I just go off of what I see and feel. And I feel like this offense is very inconsistent and it's an all or nothing approach. There's been back and forths on social media about whether the lack of walks is going to hurt this team long term especially in the post season. In addition to the walks it's the impatience on many nights that drives me crazy. Also, the lack of station to station baseball. Last night, I felt like it was nothing but attack attack attack.. clearly after a couple innings this approach was not working so why not change it up a bit? And also, no one is talking about that after we got Gray out of the game, we didn't do jack **** against their bullpen. The bullpen guys (excluding Hensley) do not have Gray "stuff". So what's the explanation for why we didn't even have a hit after we knocked Gray out? If these trends continue, yes, we may not get swept (because we'll hit enough HRs), but it'll be difficult to rattle off long winning streaks which unless they fall apart due to injury, will make it difficult to keep up with and overtake NY (they just won 7 in a row and like 10 of 13?).
    • Turned out to be a pretty good post too lol
    • Offense is down across MLB.  Some people are living in the past re their expectations. 
    • #1 is Gunnar, and it isn't even close.   He appears to be a MVP candidate and could be for the next 10 years.   Lock him up if he's willing.  Big gap #2 is Westburg.  He's a gritty, hardnosed, excellent player who I think we could lock up at a decent price.  Not being a highly touted as Gunnar and Adley I think it's possible a more team friendly deal could be obtained.   He's a solid rock that along with Gunnar could anchor our team for a while.  HUGE gap #3 Holiday.  While his mlb experience was a SSS, it had made me slightly gun shy on extending him.   I still think he'll be fine,  but my expectations have been slightly tempered.  I certainly would not offer what I may have offered in the spring.   Doubt he accepts what I'd be willing to offer at this point.  #4 Adley.  I love the man.   I love how he plays the game,  I love his bat and his baseball makeup.  I don't love his arm accuracy or his pitch calling at times.   But more importantly I don't love the fact that he'll be a catcher in his 30s for most of any extension.  And with some of the talent coming up,  I'm not sure we need an expensive DH/1st baseman type.  Catchers usually age quickly, and while he might pull a Tom Brady and play forever at a high level,  the odds are against it.  I'd extend him,  but only for a short extension,  even if the AV was a bit higher.   #5 Burnes only for a short extension,  3-4 years max.   He's great,  and just what we needed.   And I'd pay high for those 3 years.   But I don't think I'd want to be on the hook for 8 years with any pitcher right now given the injuries lately.  Burnes has been incredibly durable, but so were other pitchers until suddenly they weren't.  #6 everyone else.   Don't want to extend anyone else really.   The pitchers are too volatile and injury prone, the other position players are too flawed (Mullins, Hays, Santander) or too young (Mayo, etc).  
    • A rotation of Bradish, Rodriquez, and Kremer is a solid core.    id love them to resign Burnes. And a decision will need to be made on Means as he’s nearing free agency as well.    I suspect they will find an alternative thats quality if Burnes walks.    I suspect Means because of his medical history is signed cheap or leaves. I’m guessing we can count on one of the AAA guys to be ready soon. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...