Jump to content

Arrieta Posts


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

I'd like to hear more of what "crazy puffed up" and "coddled" means here.

Well the rumor was that they were all treated with kid gloves and made to feel they were stars before they were rookies. And they were reluctant, except for Tillman, to accept any constructive criticism or changes. But that might just have been some bar room talk to local media also. Schmuck probably knows a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 383
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Treated by who? Buck was the manager. I assumed he brought Connor on board from the Yankee connection. Wasn't Buck in charge at the time that Connor left?

Wasn't Connor Buck's first pitching coach hire as an Oriole?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You weren't high on ERod? I was very high on him. Much more so than Lee. That said, I will give the minor league coaches some props:

http://www.camdenchat.com/2016/2/4/10914602/chris-lee-is-a-name-that-baltimore-orioles-fans-should-get-to-know

In particular:

After being shipped to the O's, Lee started to turn things around. He credited Alan Mills and Rick Peterson for shortening his stride to make his delivery far less erratic. That also had an unexpected benefit: he got his velocity back. In the later part of 2015 Lee had made it through Frederick and into Bowie, and his fastball was sitting in the low to mid 90's while touching as high as 97. He finished out the year with a 3.07 ERA split between Frederick and Bowie, two levels he had never pitched in before the trade.

That said, the velocity increase is great. Need to see that he's not fastball happy and can actually get guys out via the K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Treated by who?

I guess the front office that put them on the Yearbook and the staff that Dan replaced? I guess. That was the only scuttlebutt that I heard about Connor. That he disliked our pitchers. Immensely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think so. So who would be coddling the pitchers if Buck and Connor were in charge of them?

I guess the guys before Buck and Mark then. And the GM that they worked for. Listen, It was just the local rumor. Probably nothing at all to it. It might even be revisionist since Guthrie and Bergesen and Patton and Matusz all tanked. Probably that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently coddling means not worrying about decreasing their time to plate. :snark:

Buck does have that fixation doesn't he. Lester has proved that you can pitch for years with no concern about tttp or the ability to even throw to fist base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You weren't high on ERod? I was very high on him. Much more so than Lee. That said, I will give the minor league coaches some props:

http://www.camdenchat.com/2016/2/4/10914602/chris-lee-is-a-name-that-baltimore-orioles-fans-should-get-to-know

In particular:

That said, the velocity increase is great. Need to see that he's not fastball happy and can actually get guys out via the K.

I really liked ERod until that last year. He was not much that spring when I saw him in person and even less with Bowie. Right before he was traded I saw a nice outing from him with Bowie. He was better than Davies. Eduardo was always so young for his leagues. And he is big like Jake now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt many fans knew what was going on with Jake when he was traded. Most of us knew he has great stuff. And see knew he couldn't control it.

All this information that has come out recently about the O's not letting Jake pitch the way he wanted is new information. Its all hindsight IMO. How could the fans make a good judgements when we did not know what was happening.

Connor, Adair and Buck seemed to hold Jake back as we hear it now. I would have loved to have Wallace work with Jake. Maybe that would have made the difference. Jake had an option left at the time he was traded. He could have had more time with the O's if Dan would have chosen to go that direction.

I don't blame any fan for wanting Jake gone back then. If we knew then what we know now..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's very interesting to see that Arrieta was a fastball first pitcher with the O's, but now has been a slider/cutter first pitcher for the Cubs.

What is most interesting to me is that he is now a slugger, with a higher slugging percentage than his opponents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You suspect some artificial means of his improvement? It's quite possible but the improvement happened so quickly after he left the Orioles that I'm not sure about that angle.

That and we're talking a dramatically different approach to pitching. Guessing something like Maddon saying: forget Buck and his TTP, throw your cutter again...do what got you to the majors before you were screwed to high hell.

Jake's problems have always been with runners on. So maybe some combination of a sports therapist, having his best pitch being able to be thrown without disdain and also not worrying about rushing a pitch to the plate with some of your 3rd or 4th best pitches being used probably is what did it.

The change was dramatic. And fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You suspect some artificial means of his improvement? It's quite possible but the improvement happened so quickly after he left the Orioles that I'm not sure about that angle. Plus, as everyone has already said, his stuff was already very good. Has his velocity increased? Seems like it was more about command (his ML walk rate with the Cubs is much better than even in the minors) which would seem to go more along with the mechanics argument than the steroids angle.

No, He's just become a right handed Babe Ruth. He must lift 24 7. He's huge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That and we're talking a dramatically different approach to pitching. Guessing something like Maddon saying: forget Buck and his TTP, throw your cutter again...do what got you to the majors before you were screwed to high hell.

Jake's problems have always been with runners on. So maybe some combination of a sports therapist, having his best pitch being able to be thrown without disdain and also not worrying about rushing a pitch to the plate with some of your 3rd or 4th best pitches being used probably is what did it.

The change was dramatic. And fast.

I don't think Maddon was the manager then... Otherwise, the script could work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I admit I got baited by the thread title a bit and popped off before actually listening to the thing.  It doesn't really change that I've always been concerned about Cal being part of the ownership group, but I was definitely hasty to be like "SEE??". Anyway, I've got my eye on Cal. The guy just rubs me the wrong way. But hopefully nothing much to see here, or in the future. 
    • Meanwhile, I have a question about Mayo’s defense.  Everybody implies that it’s dreadful. I guess I can understand that he’s not Manny or Brooks, but how bad is it? Are we hoping he’s at least as good as George Brett, about whom someone once said,(paraphrasing), “his defense is so bad it’s like he carries his bat to the base instead of his glove.“? I love defense, and I see absolutely no reason to move Westburg away. if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. It seems far more advisable to plunk Mayo at first and do something with the guys we currently have there?  
    • I think the thread title was misleading.  Not necessarily intentionally.  But if you just  see that without reading everything that was said and considering the context, it would be concerning.  
    • You know, for $24 a year, a measly lousy 24 bucks a year, you can edit your comment. And you can also support @Tony-OHwho has done more work online to create an Orioles environment than literally anybody else in the entire Internet universe.
    • I think there see plenty of guys who will stay with a contending team they like if the money is close.   But Burnes clearly intends to test the market.   No significant home team discount is coming, and it just takes one team to offer something crazy to knock us out of the picture unless we’re just being stupid. 
    • When Mateo is hitting well, he really makes you wonder why he can’t do it all the time.   He looks really balanced at the plate, he uses all fields, etc.  He doesn’t look like a bad hitter who happens to be on a heater.   But that’s what his track record shows he is, until proven otherwise.  I remember that Fangraphs article last year about how Mateo had changed his approach and the improvement seemed real.  Well, no it wasn’t.  But maybe his issues are more psychological than physical?   He’s just a guy who when he slumps, quickly loses confidence and starts pressing and makes it worse?   I don’t know.    As to your point about OBP: in 2024, a .299 OBP is below average but I might not say it blows.  The MLB average is back down to .312 after a spike last year after the rule changes.  Of 312 players with 80+ PA, Mateo’s .299 ranks 191st, or 39th percentile.   Honestly, in this environment, if Mateo could stay at .299 OBP he’d be a very credible player.   But he’s a .272 career OPS guy who’d been at .267 the last two years, so I’m not expecting he’ll be able to stay at .299.   I’ll enjoy it while he’s hot though.   And he is playing a mean 2B.   Took him a couple of weeks to settle in there, but he’s looked great for the last month.    
    • I broached the experiment of Holliday in CF some months ago.  It seems to be something that could make sense.  I still expect he'll be our 2B moving forward, but having such versatility is never a bad thing.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...