Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, nate22 said:

They are probably going to put 3 infielders behind the catcher in case of wild pitches on strike three.

When I was maybe 10 to 12, playing unorganized baseball (we didn't have any organized ball, other than in school), the supreme compliment to a batter was for the defense to say to the OFs, "Sink out, heavy hitter." That gave rise, to "Sink in, lousy hitter." Since boys are always looking to ratchet up the insults (and somewhere in there Eddie Feigner's four-man softball team showed up on Wide World of Sports), that led to OFers sitting down or gathering in one spot and talking among themselves, not because they wanted to but just to try to make the batter feel bad. (I was in neither category, but if the other team had moved the LF and CF in so they were backing up the SS hole and the 2B bag, they would have taken away the majority of my hits.) I don't think "adjustments" was in our baseball vocabulary.)

I've thought about that often when Davis came up last season and especially this year in ST. Are there guys in the field thinking stuff like "It's hot out here. I could use some water," or "This would be a good time to pee" or "I wish I could use this break in the action to make a few phone calls," figuring that they wouldn't be missed since odds of Davis both making contact and hitting the ball to them are so small. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
11 minutes ago, weams said:

 

Davis is now 12 at bats from tying the record for most consecutive at bats without a hit by a position player (Eugenio Velez).  He can tie or break the record this homestand most likely.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenio_Vélez

Quote

On September 23, he struck out three times to break a 75-year-old record for most at-bats in a season without a hit (36) and tie a 102-year-old record for most consecutive at-bats without a hit spanning more than one season (45).[9]

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, weams said:

 

 

There will never be enough humiliation to give up $92 million, sorry. Buyout, just as unlikely. Many vets sign contracts with incentives attached to positive performance achievements. Too bad, the reverse isn't true. If player's don't achieve a baseline performance level their pay will be adjusted in some manner. It will never happen, just saying. Imagine biting the bullet on Davis, release him, someone takes a rider and he bounces back to some form of normalcy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, UpstateNYfan said:


 

There will never be enough humiliation to give up $92 million, sorry. Buyout, just as unlikely. Many vets sign contracts with incentives attached to positive performance achievements. Too bad, the reverse isn't true. If player's don't achieve a baseline performance level their pay will be adjusted in some manner. It will never happen, just saying. Imagine biting the bullet on Davis, release him, someone takes a rider and he bounces back to some form of normalcy?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, weams said:

 

So, what you are saying is.....

 

We should have only paid Chris Davis $147 million for 6 years like the Dodgers paid Greinke, or we would get better value for Davis if he only hit every 5th Day. ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris Davis has like 25Ks in his last 50 ABs... and 2 hits! 

Wow. Just wow. He's got to be so ashamed of himself. 

Did he get his numbers and therefore his contract while using "the juice" ? Only he knows. If he did, then he needs to retire and give us half that money back at least. 

I'll be curious to see the reaction he gets today on opening day. I expect polite clapping. I'll hope for dead silence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...