Jump to content

Kyle Bradish 2021


Frobby

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Ruzious said:

Right.  He mentioned there were several different balls.  But the proof was in the pudding - He finished the season very strongly, so presumably he was able to get used to the ball he'll be using in MLB.  Tbh, if some are trying to paint him having a bad attitude from that interview... I think that's an enormous stretch.   

It actually wasn't just from that interview. Nothing in the interview was problematic to me.

Like I said, I don't know anything about the guy. Probably shouldn't have said anything. It's just a vibe I've picked up when he's struggled this year.

I do think he carries himself like a dude though. Thinks he's badass. Probably is badass. Again. Just the very distant vibe I get. No inside info or anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/1/2021 at 12:17 PM, LookinUp said:

I don't mean to stir the pot because I know nothing about him, but I get the feeling that he has a sour attitude. 

I get the feeling that he thinks he's really good and was very frustrated with the ball in AAA this year. I hope he's right about the first part and gets over the second part. Lol.

You are correct: You know nothing about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/1/2021 at 5:57 PM, Ruzious said:

Right.  He mentioned there were several different balls.  But the proof was in the pudding - He finished the season very strongly, so presumably he was able to get used to the ball he'll be using in MLB.  Tbh, if some are trying to paint him having a bad attitude from that interview... I think that's an enormous stretch.   

He basically ditched the curveball and went slider heavy late in the year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ruzious said:

Do you think his curveball was a good pitch for him before going to AAA?  Apologies if you've already spoken to that.  

It had good 1-7 bite and seemed to be a good offset to his fastball, but that pitch doesn't seemed to be used very much in the majors by right-handers as often now. He tended to bury it a lot in the dirt and that also doesn't typically work in the majors. 

He only had a 11% swinging strike rate in AAA but I don't have the break down between pitches. 

I try to remember how good Kremer's curveball looked in Double-A and how it didn't work in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/16/2021 at 5:38 PM, Tony-OH said:

It had good 1-7 bite and seemed to be a good offset to his fastball, but that pitch doesn't seemed to be used very much in the majors by right-handers as often now. He tended to bury it a lot in the dirt and that also doesn't typically work in the majors. 

He only had a 11% swinging strike rate in AAA but I don't have the break down between pitches. 

I try to remember how good Kremer's curveball looked in Double-A and how it didn't work in the majors.

Historically, Bradish got a lot of looking K's with that pitch as it starts out looking at eye level and then it just " falls off the table" and into the strike zone.

How that pitch will develop in the future is anyone's guess. However, (depending on how MLB screws around with the balls in the off season) it may become effective again, or be dropped for something else.

BTW, Congratulations to Bradish for being added to the O's 40 man roster!

Edited by Lurker
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I think the point is just touched 100.   The wall I think is just there to save on training space - pitch velo is I believe at max right out of the hand and slows down a bit on the way to the plate.

It looked to me like on the second one that got there he got some extra momentum stepping forward with his right leg first as an outfielder would getting some extra oomph on a throw.   I don't think pitchers get to do that either from the windup or stretch.  

But yeah, touching 100.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, interloper said:

It is my contention that the board is sleeping on Bradish. He reminds me a lot of Chris Tillman, except with reliable velocity instead of 88 one night, 94 another night. The breaking ball is going to play. He's still learning and adjusting I think. 

I hope you’re right.  He finished the season very strong.  With 86.2 innings of AAA under his belt, he’s actually got more AAA time than any of the pitching prospects we’ve promoted over the last two years except for Akin.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2022 at 4:42 PM, interloper said:

It is my contention that the board is sleeping on Bradish. He reminds me a lot of Chris Tillman, except with reliable velocity instead of 88 one night, 94 another night. The breaking ball is going to play. He's still learning and adjusting I think. 

The interesting thing is he basically dumped the big curveball for the slider late in the year as his goto pitch when he had better success. The problem is he really doesn't have a consistent changeup to give him that 3rd pitch.

The change is pretty hard in the 89-90 range but he was holding his velocity into the 5th inning better by the end of the year.

I still think he's going to end up in the pen as a good bullpen arm, but there's still some hope for him as a starter. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

The interesting thing is he basically dumped the big curveball for the slider late in the year as his goto pitch when he had better success. The problem is he really doesn't have a consistent changeup to give him that 3rd pitch.

The change is pretty hard in the 89-90 range but he was holding his velocity into the 5th inning better by the end of the year.

I still think he's going to end up in the pen as a good bullpen arm, but there's still some hope for him as a starter. 

I've read Gausman say the key to his success was basically becoming a two pitch pitcher, but I haven't bothered to look at his pitch chart to see how true that was. Sometimes all you need is a get me over 3rd pitch that doesn't have to be good just slightly offspeed from the other two. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

I've read Gausman say the key to his success was basically becoming a two pitch pitcher, but I haven't bothered to look at his pitch chart to see how true that was. Sometimes all you need is a get me over 3rd pitch that doesn't have to be good just slightly offspeed from the other two. 

He certainly did go very fastball, split change heavy last year. 

His pitches:

Fastball - 1583
Split Finger - 1061
Changeup - 181 ..these could have been just bad split fingers in my opinion
Slider - 177

Bradish though doesn't have that swing and miss pitch like Gausman's split-finger. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think Mountcastle is the foremost person hurt by Walltimore. I honestly think we need to reconsider what type of right handed batters we throw out there. More Luis Arraez or someone with high OBP. I could see Mountcastle having a revival somewhere else. But not sure it’s really working here anymore, even though he was solid last year. 
    • Who is the real MOO bat though?  I can't think of one other than Soto available.  I am all in on Soto, but I don't think the Orioles will even sniff him.  Absent Soto, who do you look to acquire? I agree that it is time to move on from Tony and Mounty, but I do think you are a little harsh on Tony.  He has won a number of games for this team in the clutch.  He is just prone to cold spells.  
    • OK, there won't be 30 making actual bids but Burnes is free to sign with any team at the highest price. There is one very big reason he won't sign with us, which is money. We do have payroll flexibility but that evaporates if we put $40m/year in one player. I would love this if it happens but my expectations are very low. Even if we are "one of the favorites", say the final four, we only have a 25% chance. Probably lower if any of the others are in larger markets. So I have to agree with Roch's assessment. 
    • In that case the question could be do we pay Mountcastle 6-7M or do we pay a AAAA guy league minimum and use his money on RP. The purpose of keeping Mountcastle was the hope he would eventually break out and have a career year. He’s regressing offensively and the odds of that breakout are shrinking. 
    • With his season now over, curious what happened to the version of Cowser we drafted. looking at his scouting report coming out of Sam Houston State, the concern with him was would his power translate to MLB while his plate discipline and ability to draw walks being a plus. Certainly were concerns about the strikeouts but nowhere near the concerns of someone like Honeycutt.    He finishes the year with 52 walks and 172 strikeouts, with a 30% K rate. He was near the top of the league in strikeouts for most of the year.  is this purely his issues with off speed pitches? Can this be improved or do we accept the awful strikeouts and laud the plus defense.
    • I want to also address the Harper point. I'm talking about RISP, not "late and close". We can talk about high leverage/late and close in a diff convo, but strictly RISP: Bryce Harper 2023: 272/.803 2024: 331/ 1.122 2023 was a goofy year for Harper coming off of Tommy John. He looked good in April, but was a disaster in May/June before finishing the season on fire that year. I don't think he's a good case study for your example. Besides, I'm not talking singular player performance. I'm talking as a team which is far less susceptible to SSS and "chance". FWIW, I do think luck somewhat plays into this.  But let's look at this as a team. 1,298 AB with RISP for the O's this year. A 251 BA. Last year they hit 287. That's a 36 point difference. Yeah, only 3.6%. But let's look at what 3.6% means with that many AB. That means: 47 extra hits. I don't believe that 47 hits explains "luck" or "chance". Maybe for certain hitters in certain situations. There is an element of BABIP here. In 2024, it was 317. This year? 289. So, if we truly believe 300 is league average, they were a little unlucky this year, and somewhat lucky last year. But we are still talking about a dramatic dropoff. Now, is that because of playing more rookies this year? Because of the injuries? Very possibly. And in a 2 game series that can rear its ugly head. But there was nothing unlucky about yesterday or the day before. They just came up completely empty. Maybe the only unlucky situations were Ramon and Westy rips being caught.
    • I mentioned this once before but if you follow high end D1 softball the game has changed dramatically because the pitching is so dominate.  The theory is, you aren't going to score a bunch of runs by stringing singles together so most top programs only recruit athletes with game changing power or speed.  The speed aspect is important because you can turn a single into a double by stealing so now it only takes 2 hits to score a run instead of 3.   The O's lower minors seem to be stacked with guys that can steal bases so maybe that will be the change in philosophy moving forward.   It is just a thought but maybe the organization see's the pitching trend that is dominating because of the bullpen usage and OBP and runs scored across the board are down.  So stack your team with power and or speed and not much else matters.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...