Jump to content

2021 Orioles #21 Prospect - John Rhodes - OF


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Chaka Garcia said:

Who wants guess if he starts next year at Delmarva versus Federick?

He'll play most of next year at 21 so I'm guessing he starts at Delmarva, especially after not exactly lighting things up. There is still going to be a little bit of a traffic jam there in the outfield with Deson, Craig, Trimble, Williams, and Rhodes needing playing time though I'm guessing Williams' advanced approach will give him a chance to start at Aberdeen. 

Cowser could get the Rutschman approach and start next year in AA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Steve Pearce seems like a good comp. He’s built like Pearce as well. Hopefully his sophomore slump was nothing more than something that enabled him to fall to us in the draft. IIRC he had big time wood bat summer league numbers too. 

Was thinking this as well. @Tony-OH, where do you think Rhodes would have been drafted had he repeated his Freshman season numbers?

 

Quote

Rhodes was the National co-Freshman of the year when he slashed .426/.485/.672/1.157 in 17 games during the COVID shortened 2020 season but slumped to .251/.397/.508/.905 during his redshirt Sophomore season this year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

Was thinking this as well. @Tony-OH, where do you think Rhodes would have been drafted had he repeated his Freshman season numbers?

 

 

With those gaudy numbers, probably a 1st rounder since he went into the season top 30-50 college prospects in several national publications.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know much about this kid beyond what Tony has written, but I think the important thing - especially in the 20's - is the profile. This kid has a chance to be a legit cog in this organization. He also has a chance to not progress beyond AA. I get that, but the goal to me is to stockpile a lot of guys like this through your drafts because some will have years like Stowers and maybe turn into better. 

This guy has a chance to be good. You like that with your #21 prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

This guy has a chance to be good. You like that with your #21 prospect.

Exactly. I’m predicting that Trimble and Willem are our #23 and #24 prospects. So you have a guy like Rhodes that had/has 1st rd talent. Then your most recent 2nd pick in Trimble. Then a million dollar overslot HS Catcher in Willem. Then a 20/20 CF that hasn’t even really been talked about. 
 

That’s a top system. With the #1 upcoming pick in hand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...