Jump to content

2021 Orioles #28 Prospect - Anthony Servideo - INF


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

It’s frustrating that Hall, Vavra, Ortiz and Servideo all had their seasons cut short. We’d know so much more about where they really belong on this list if they had played a full season.   

I doubt I would have included Servideo in my top 30 if he ended a full year with a sub-.100 ISO (it was .066 in limited action).    I just don’t think his BA/OBP would stand up with that little pop.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spoiler: Hall won't be in the top 30.

As for Servideo, I expected to see a much better defensive profile. I knew his bat wasn't great, but I expected more of a Grenier type of profile. That said, with this profile I might actually take Grenier over Servideo. It's unclear to me why he's listed other than draft position.

That comes with all of the caveats of injury, player development, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

Spoiler: Hall won't be in the top 30.

As for Servideo, I expected to see a much better defensive profile. I knew his bat wasn't great, but I expected more of a Grenier type of profile. That said, with this profile I might actually take Grenier over Servideo. It's unclear to me why he's listed other than draft position.

That comes with all of the caveats of injury, player development, etc.

I like the athleticism, plate discipline, and speed of Servideo and he hasn't played enough to show his potential warts. He's got a chance to go out to the outfield and add value and left-handed hitting utility guy who can get on base, steal a base, and be versatile has some value. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And they don’t want to admit they were that wrong about a guy.

I can understand not writing a toolsy prospect off after a bad year, but when there are more red flags than tools, and the performance doesn't match up, you have to be able to adjust. 

But then again, this is how players like Josh Hart stay on some national prospects lists long after they've shown they are not legitimate prospects. If you recall, I was one of the first to be luke warm on Hart (I never even like the videos I saw him at showcase events) then dropped him real low then off the list in two years. Meanwhile I think BA had him at #5 or something.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I can understand not writing a toolsy prospect off after a bad year, but when there are more red flags than tools, and the performance doesn't match up, you have to be able to adjust. 

But then again, this is how players like Josh Hart stay on some national prospects lists long after they've shown they are not legitimate prospects. If you recall, I was one of the first to be luke warm on Hart (I never even like the videos I saw him at showcase events) then dropped him real low then off the list in two years. Meanwhile I think BA had him at #5 or something.

 

I think it was BP who really loved him.   I recall Stotle posting a rationale for their high ranking of Hart while he was working for BP, even though he wasn’t involved in the ranking.   

As to Hall, I haven’t given up on him, but this year was a definite setback for him and he doesn’t warrant top 30 treatment.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question that will help me understand these guys are where they are:

Ryan McKenna is limited with the bat, but runs and defends well. I am assuming his ceiling is 4OF And he seems to be there. His -2 and -3 WAR are underwater, but not extremely so, but nobody wants a negative player anywhere, so my question is where would he be on this list?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Philip said:

I have a question that will help me understand these guys are where they are:

Ryan McKenna is limited with the bat, but runs and defends well. I am assuming his ceiling is 4OF And he seems to be there. His -2 and -3 WAR are underwater, but not extremely so, but nobody wants a negative player anywhere, so my question is where would he be on this list?

Well, last year he was no. 27, and just below Servideo.   I’d say he didn’t improve his stock this year.   The speed and good defense were already known.   The issue was whether he’d hit, and he didn’t.   So, I’d say stock mildly down.   He’d be at the bottom of the list, or just off it.   My opinion.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Well, last year he was no. 27, and just below Servideo.   I’d say he didn’t improve his stock this year.   The speed and good defense were already known.   The issue was whether he’d hit, and he didn’t.   So, I’d say stock mildly down.   He’d be at the bottom of the list, or just off it.   My opinion.  

The reason I asked was to get a sense of how these 20-30 guys would be doing if they were on the big club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I too was *this* pissed off yesterday. I'm sympathetic. But the reality of the situation is that Kansas City played out of their minds defensively and baseball happened.  Now, this was a microcosm of the second half of the season and that's just a fact. They dealt with injuries, just like every team does... they just didn't deal with them very effectively. I'm not sure if casting blame upon the hitting coaches or Hyde really holds any water for me. But I understand the desire for a scapegoat. It was REALLY hard to watch batter after batter trying to hit a 13 run home run on pitches that weren't really all that close to the strike zone. They were way out of their lanes and it was patently obvious that panic was setting in. I felt like it was a basketball game and Hyde needed to call a timeout or something. Like they needed to be snapped out of it or something, maybe by something drastic like, oh, putting Jackson Holliday in there for an at bat in an important spot.  They hit a lot of balls at guys, they swung at bunch of BS repeatedly. I saw it from Mountcastle, Santander, Henderson, Cowser (embarrassingly so), McCann during game 1, Rutschman too.  The only thing I could maybe blame Hyde for is not successfully alleviating the panic. Baseball's different though... I'm just a slapdick fan, I have no idea what the realities of his job are. But that lineup needed to find a way to relax and the further the game went the more they freaked out. It was the opposite of a loose dugout. It was fear, panic and foreboding doom. Is it even possible to snap that group out of it? I dunno. The veterans were the ones (other than Mullins) that were pressing the most. I think I would have found a way to get Holliday or Kjerstad some meaningful at bats. Yeah, maybe that's Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe they would have reacted the same way the rest of them did.  They couldn't have been worse...  
    • Ok I’m changing this a little. Don’t know O’Hearn is worth the 8 mil.. Maybe we can replace. I’m actually pretty juiced at the potential of this and all of these guys are overdue for regular ABs together.    CF Mullins 3B Westburg C Adley SS Gunnar LF Cowser DH O’hearn/Mayo 1B Mountcastle  RF Kjerstad 2B Holliday Util: Mayo (regular DH platoon, spot starts in the field, Mateo (speed/defense)  
    • Honestly, they need to fix the right field wall too.  It is too ridiculous and screws with the right-handed hitters.  Move it in 10 feet and lower it a bit.
    • I said it before, and I'll say it again. This Royals team is entirely a function of their starting pitching (Ragans, Lugo, Wacha, Singer) and their recent BP arm pickups/conversions (Erceg, Bubic, Lynch, etc.). Their offense is basically Witt, Pasq, and Perez. I was pretty confident that the O's could shut them down going into this series, and they did. They only scored 3 runs. And none of their run scoring hits were all that amazing...if at all. The issue, of course, was the offense. Was that because of the pitching? Personally I thought Ragans looked hittable. He pitched better than Lugo, but the O's came up tiny in RISP situations. Same as yesterday. Ragans and Lugo mostly pitched out of the zone, and the O's just were aggressive. So, in this regard, give the credit to the Royals scouts and analytics teams. They knew exactly how to pitch to Santander: up, up, up. They knew exactly how to pitch to Cowser: low changeups. They knew exactly how to pitch to everybody not named Cedric Mullins. This Royals club is half decent, and if this O's club was the 2023 team, they shellack them. Alas, here we are. Think the Yankees are going to railroad these guys if they aren't rusty. 
    • He was developed according to the Orioles'  development plan.
    • Ryan Mountcastle avoiding getting hit in his dick with a pitch while trying to hold up his swing was infuriating.  
    • For the most part, no. The biggest thing a manager does is the culture they set and what they do off the field.  By all accounts, the players like Hyde, the culture is good and the team is happy with him. Now, if there is something there that we don’t know about, by all means make the change. However,  if every report is true, I see no reason to make a change. That’s making a change just to make a change. I would rather focus on the on field than assume some ceremonial change at manager is going to matter. Its been studied and we have talked about it a lot but in game strategy is so similar that its really only a game or two in terms of “manager WAR”.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...