Jump to content

Jordan Lyles 2022


Il BuonO

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

What’s crazy is that he is pitching well. Fingers crossed.

FTFY: What’s crazy is that he is pitching well ENOUGH. Fingers crossed.

How often will we be able to say this in 2022?

The Red Sox went 3-7 on a swing through Tampa Bay, Toronto and Baltimore to drop within a half-game of the last-place Orioles in the AL East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

FTFY: What’s crazy is that he is pitching well ENOUGH. Fingers crossed.

How often will we be able to say this in 2022?

The Red Sox went 3-7 on a swing through Tampa Bay, Toronto and Baltimore to drop within a half-game of the last-place Orioles in the AL East.

Hopefully, often.   This may not be the best Red Sox team.  Of course, I also said that when we swept them in the opening series last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By my calculations, Lyles' outing today should bring his ERA to 4.68.  If he keeps that up all year I think we would all be thrilled with that.  I expect him to regress a bit, but honestly, he doesn't look like he's going to be a disaster.

Interesting note on the environment.  That 4.68 would still be below 90 ERA+.  The O's have (going into today) a collective ERA of 3.61, but we're still only 11th in RA.  11th in RA with a collective ERA+ of 107.  Part of that is an abnormal amount of unearned runs.  

But part of it too is a really low offensive environment.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pickles said:

By my calculations, Lyles' outing today should bring his ERA to 4.68.  If he keeps that up all year I think we would all be thrilled with that.  I expect him to regress a bit, but honestly, he doesn't look like he's going to be a disaster.

Interesting note on the environment.  That 4.68 would still be below 90 ERA+.  The O's have (going into today) a collective ERA of 3.61, but we're still only 11th in RA.  11th in RA with a collective ERA+ of 107.  Part of that is an abnormal amount of unearned runs.  

But part of it too is a really low offensive environment.

If he throws 160-180 innings of 5 ERA ball, he will have been worth signing.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

If he throws 160-180 innings of 5 ERA ball, he will have been worth signing.

Not disagreeing, but let's assume for the sake of argument that runs stay right where they are for the rest of the year.  A 5.00 ERA this year would be the last year equivalent of about a 5.80. Psychologically it feels okay, but in 2022 in OPACY a 5.00 ERA isn't good.

But after five years of the worst pitching in the majors I'm fine with some delusions and placebos from dead balls and park effects.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Not disagreeing, but let's assume for the sake of argument that runs stay right where they are for the rest of the year.  A 5.00 ERA this year would be the last year equivalent of about a 5.80. Psychologically it feels okay, but in 2022 in OPACY a 5.00 ERA isn't good.

But after five years of the worst pitching in the majors I'm fine with some delusions and placebos from dead balls and park effects.

Well, a 6ish ERA is about what I expected out of him this year, which would have also likely meant less innings.

The IP are really the key.  If he can keep us in most games and throw “a lot” of innings, that’s good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Not disagreeing, but let's assume for the sake of argument that runs stay right where they are for the rest of the year.  A 5.00 ERA this year would be the last year equivalent of about a 5.80. Psychologically it feels okay, but in 2022 in OPACY a 5.00 ERA isn't good.

But after five years of the worst pitching in the majors I'm fine with some delusions and placebos from dead balls and park effects.

Not disagreeing either, but it sounds like you're disagreeing.  😇

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bobmc said:

Not disagreeing either, but it sounds like you're disagreeing.  😇

They needed someone who can get through five innings without embarrassing themselves.  It's easier when the league scores four runs a game than five.  Takes a long time for perceptions to catch up with reality.  Even if nothing changes it'll be 2030 before a 5.00 is embarrassing.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year, Lyle’s 5.15 ERA equated to an 85 ERA+.   This year, his 4.50 ERA equates to an 85 ERA+, in the tepid run scoring environment we’ve seen in the early going.   I expect scoring will increase as the weather warms and the number of pitchers teams are allowed to carry shrinks.   So Lyles’ ERA probably increases from here.   If he stays in the 85 ERA+ range (regardless of what his raw ERA is), he’s meeting reasonable expectations so far as I’m concerned.   Four of his five starts have come against AL East clubs, so that’s a good sign that the change in opponent quality hasn’t affected his performance much so far.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I dont think it matters in the playoffs. You need a little bit of luck in a 5 or a 3 game series.
    • I don't think most of the issues with Rays attendance and engagement is because of the roster churn. It's because of the stadium, the competition from the Lightning and Bucs for entertainment dollars and the transient fanbase mostly having allegiances to other teams. 
    • Would you rather have Atlanta's roster or Texas?
    • It's been said many times already but the Rangers won with pitchers NO ONE would have said were much better than Cole Irvin last year. In addition, Atlanta lost in the NLDS despite having maybe one of the best rosters ever assembled. As for ownership,  as stated all evidence is Elias is not going chips all in on one season as much as you may want him to. Rubenstein has said hes taking a hands off approach especially in this first season as has totally faith in the front office.  Unless you want a repeat of the Duquette years, going all in, prospects be damned, is a strategy from a bygone era.
    • Is Justin Verlander toast?     Maybe the future resembles the past. In Bradish's presumed absence, he's an interesting possible character as one of the three lead SP. I do believe the Astros staggered his start this year knowing at his age 26 weeks + October is too heavy a lift.    He's presently sidelined with a sore neck after getting scratched a couple days ago (and the Astros getting routed when they had to accelerate a kiddo).  Last October he had two good games and one bad game against MIN and TEX. Astros this week have a cold/hot mix with the White Sox before us this weekend, when we might get a live look.
    • IMO because all big contracts come with various degrees of risk. The wisest course is to spend on the best/most talented player. They are the ones who most likely have the longest run of great to good in them, even if they cost the most. What you don't want to do is spend money on guys who fall off of cliffs early or are injury prone or who do not have the mentality to handle success or who do not have very strong work habits and will likely become comfortable after getting paid. That is why I think (like many others) that Gunnar is the guy you want to extend even if you have to move heaven and earth to do so. I just don't see anything in his profile/short history that are any kind of "red flags". It is likely to be worth it (at least for a long time - at least next decade). Also taking into account the momentum that the O's are riding with winning, so many young homegrown stars, and new ownership. IF they were to extend a Henderson and/or Rustchman IMO it will take the org to a new level and provide even greater momentum and fan interest/marketplace growth. That is how you become the next "big player/franchise" that can sustain winning beyond a short/6 yr team control window. I've stated before that I worry that a Rays model of ongoing rebuilding, never spending meaningfully, and never being invested enough as an org to be fully committed to winning sends the wrong message to your customer/fanbase and will never really engage a community/marketplace fully. 
    • I doubt they give him a 2-3 year deal, I do think if he's here it's because they give a QO and he takes it, which I also doubt he'd do, because someone is going to pay him more for longer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...