Jump to content

Orioles acquire Ryan O’Hearn


Brian88

Recommended Posts

I would prefer to watch Urias, Stowers, and Vavra over Frazier and O'Hearn.

I also don't want to see Westburg and Cowser blocked by these stopgaps.

Can't James McCann start a couple games at 1B? He played there a bit last season. He has a career .777 OPS against LHP...

I also think Urias should be playing 5-6 days a week. The man has 5.6 rWAR over his first 690 career ABs for god's sake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

Not really, the Givens and McCann deals received overwhelmingly positive responses.

Exactly. I think most people call them as they see them. I liked the Givens deal and had no issue with McCann since he was injured a bunch last year and is a good bounce back candidate.

Besides the Frazier move, none of the rest of his moves really matter all that much. Gibson is Lyles, maybe better, but basically the same kind of starter. 

The entire offseason has been treading water vs what we were told to expect by Elias. 

He's been shopping in the bargain bin all winter and most of us thought this was the year he would  actually go out and add those impact players that would announce the Orioles were legitimate contenders. 

Unfortunately, we're getting O'Hearn types and while I get the people that say he's just AAA depth with a chance to make the team with injuries, I'm concerned that Elias has every intent on O'Hearn not only making the team, but probably getting 370-425 PAs this year.

Elias still can makes some trades that could bring an impact player, but so far his offseason has been an F since he did not get either of the things he needed in a #1-2 starter and a MOO. 

Hopefully he will still get it done.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, btdart20 said:

I hear you.  I was a bit snarky.  Overwhelmingly positive, yes.  But there were "people" (as SG said) who had different thoughts.  There were some people questioning McCann as not clearly better than Chirinos (i.e. an upgrade) and/or we should have gone down another path instead.  I didn't go through the Givens thread.

My general point is that everyone has an opinion.  Good, bad, thoughtful, lazy, and everything in between.  And taking shots as leadership is always in vogue.  Destroying is simpler than creating.

What does destroying vs creating have anything to do with people's conversations here? I haven't seen a single person asking for Elias to be fired or to tear it all down. Most of the people here have been very supportive of how Elias has rebuilt this franchise. 

Saying all that, now he's at the next phase of being a GM and that's taking the next step to being a true contender and so far this offseason he's failed. Just because I like things he's done in the past doesn't mean I'm going to turn a blind eye to the bad offseason so far.

This offseason has brought nothing be reclamation projects or water treading with the possible exception of Givens making the bullpen stronger. Elias himself said he wanted a #1-#3 pitcher and MOO and has gotten neither. 

The only good news is we have six weeks of potential trading to get there before spring training.

It's ok to be critical. It's not personal, and I personally applauded the Givens move and liked the McCann move overall. Gibson is fine as a Lyles replacement. 

But the needle has not moved this offseason. That's disappointing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Would depend on what the contract Elias signed looked like.

I'm guessing there is a mother of a no compete clause in there if he quits.

Just an assumption of 5 years based on past GM contracts.  Kind of assume this is his last year under contract.  Just a gut feeling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m all for adding depth…but depth doesn’t equal warm bodies. They added warm bodies, not good depth.

For example..I wanted Hays to become depth this year. Now maybe he will if/when Cowser is up but for now, he’s not and I think that’s a bad plan.

I don’t  see good depth on this team right now, at least in terms of “proven players”

Some of the starters people want aren’t proven either though. If you look at MLB benches you aren’t getting anything special.  They are in that spot for a reason. 
 

Last year you had Chirinos, Nevin, Owings, etc. The bench is superior this year plus the prospects are a year older and in a position to help unlike last year. I’m well aware of how you and others feel about Frazier but he is capable of being a starting second baseman. McCann is a significant upgrade over Chirinos. Not dealing Mateo/Urias improves the depth. I don’t know what they will get from O’Hearn but I can see the logic in the move. Clearly they have created a lineup with better options than last year. Still have Vavra in the organization. 
 

Who are the Orioles are in August will be different from April. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Exactly. I think most people call them as they see them. I liked the Givens deal and had no issue with McCann since he was injured a bunch last year and is a good bounce back candidate.

Besides the Frazier move, none of the rest of his moves really matter all that much. Gibson is Lyles, maybe better, but basically the same kind of starter. 

The entire offseason has been treading water vs what we were told to expect by Elias. 

He's been shopping in the bargain bin all winter and most of us thought this was the year he would  actually go out and add those impact players that would announce the Orioles were legitimate contenders. 

Unfortunately, we're getting O'Hearn types and while I get the people that say he's just AAA depth with a chance to make the team with injuries, I'm concerned that Elias has every intent on O'Hearn not only making the team, but probably getting 370-425 PAs this year.

Elias still can makes some trades that could bring an impact player, but so far his offseason has been an F since he did not get either of the things he needed in a #1-2 starter and a MOO. 

Hopefully he will still get it done.

 

I just can’t see O’Hearn getting that many at bats. If he does it would mean he is pounding the ball. 
 

Hyde is going to have to find time to play Urias/Mateo. Santander will be a DH, Adley, Stowers, plus when they rest other guys. I just don’t see how that many at bats would be there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Some of the starters people want aren’t proven either though. If you look at MLB benches you aren’t getting anything special.  They are in that spot for a reason. 
 

Last year you had Chirinos, Nevin, Owings, etc. The bench is superior this year plus the prospects are a year older and in a position to help unlike last year. I’m well aware of how you and others feel about Frazier but he is capable of being a starting second baseman. McCann is a significant upgrade over Chirinos. Not dealing Mateo/Urias improves the depth. I don’t know what they will get from O’Hearn but I can see the logic in the move. Clearly they have created a lineup with better options than last year. Still have Vavra in the organization. 
 

Who are the Orioles are in August will be different from April. 

I don’t see some superior bench.  Not sure why you keep saying that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I just can’t see O’Hearn getting that many at bats. If he does it would mean he is pounding the ball. 
 

Hyde is going to have to find time to play Urias/Mateo. Santander will be a DH, Adley, Stowers, plus when they rest other guys. I just don’t see how that many at bats would be there. 

We shall see. They found a lot of PAs for Odor even after they were contending, and he was terrible. Until Elias/Hyde proves otherwise, we have to assume vets will gets their PAs on their watch. 

I hope we have better options than O'Hearn at 1B/DH, but for now, I'd pencil him onto the 26th man roster with ample playing time against right-handers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I still care about wins. I remember following Palmer and others to get to 20 in the 70s. That's one of the things I miss about baseball from those years when all the starting pitchers would have these big win-loss totals in July and beyond. Fingers was talking yesterday about having an 8-man staff in the playoffs one year. I hope Rodriguez can get to 20.  
    • Though there are a lot of outfielders right now I am not sure there will be that many next year.   Santander, Hays and maybe even Mullins may not be on the team.   That leaves Kjerstad probably RF,   Cowser CF depending on if he hits.     Norby, Stowers are probably traded.    Beavers and Fabian are not hitting that well at AA.   They could spend all season next year at AAA.   I could see Mayo at 3B and Westburg in LF.  Not because Westburg isn't a good 3B but because of Mayo, Holliday and Westburg,  I think Westburg would be the best LFer. So I don't really see Kjerstad as expendable.
    • I don’t expect it to happen, but I still always holD out hope for some of the high upside hs bats (Gillen specifically at 22, almost any of them at 32). We really don’t do it, but have really hit when we do (Jackson, Gunnar, Mayo).    id be a bit surprised if Benge is still there, and Honeycutt. 
    • While those three SP are pretty good. The Cubs problem is their bullpen but even more so (like much of MLB) their offense. I'm very confident that we will handle them like we do everyone else.
    • I agree trading Kjerstad is borderline.  I suggested a Kjerstad led deal for Crochet.   Two problems.  Some people don’t think that’s enough and I’m still not confident Elias would do it even if it was enough.   
    • I understand the sentiment, IMO it's just the wrong situation. Teams that are this good, young, and inexpensive should not cast their lot on "cash considerations" kinds of players. We are arguably the best team in baseball with a very legit shot at a title (first in over 40 years). The waiver wire/players who are DFA's is not the way to go this year. Even if an opportunity arises where a useful player like Aaron Hicks becomes available (like he did last year), it is doubtful that we would be high enough in the peaking order to claim such a player (given how good our record is). I don't think you should ever shut yourself off from any avenue of talent acquisition. But I'm curious why you think "the waiver wire"/"bargain bin"/"cash considerations" is the best way to improve the team? 
    • Fortunately, or maybe unfortunately, I was just shy of my 24th birthday and I remember it very well.  😀
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...