Jump to content

Orioles acquire Ryan O’Hearn


Brian88

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

So here’s what I’m trying to figure out: We DFA’d Diaz while Vallimont was still on the 40-man, so we apparently thought Vallimont was more worth keeping than Diaz.  But then we DFA’d Vallimont to make room for O’Hearn, and then O’Hearn to make room for Diaz.  That suggests we’d rather have Diaz than Vallimont, right?   It doesn’t make a ton of sense unless we’re hoping one of these guys slips past waivers.  

Hey... at least Cash Considerations is still in the organization, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Frobby said:

So here’s what I’m trying to figure out: We DFA’d Diaz while Vallimont was still on the 40-man, so we apparently thought Vallimont was more worth keeping than Diaz.  But then we DFA’d Vallimont to make room for O’Hearn, and then O’Hearn to make room for Diaz.  That suggests we’d rather have Diaz than Vallimont, right?   It doesn’t make a ton of sense unless we’re hoping one of these guys slips past waivers.  

Diaz will not be on the 40 man roster on OD anyway.  Though he can field he can't hit.  What difference does it make if he is left-handed if he can't hit major league pitching?  He is really depth in case of injury.

Diaz and Zimmermann are both vulnerable to Elias' next waiver claim or cheap pick up IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

Diaz will not be on the 40 man roster on OD anyway.  Though he can field he can't hit.  What difference does it make if he is left-handed if he can't hit major league pitching?  He is really depth in case of injury.

Diaz and Zimmermann are both vulnerable to Elias' next waiver claim or cheap pick up IMO.

The Orioles agree with you.  They are hoping to get Diaz to AAA.   He hasn't hit.   He has some talent.   He has some interesting numbers in AAA where he has hit.   Now, when they designate him again, there is a better chance he makes it past the Braves and every other team and they can finally send him down to Norfolk.   He's only 26.   He hit 39 homes in a little over a season's worth of games in AAA.    He's a gold glove potential 1B from all reports.     IF he can tighten up his plate discipline a little more he might be a nice pickup.

Edited by RZNJ
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The Orioles agree with you.  They are hoping to get Diaz to AAA.   He hasn't hit.   He has some talent.   He has some interesting numbers in AAA where he has hit.   Now, when they designate him again, there is a better chance he makes it past the Braves and every other team and they can finally send him down to Norfolk.   He's only 26.   He hit 39 homes in a little over a season's worth of games in AAA.    He's a gold glove potential 1B from all reports.     IF he can tighten up his plate discipline a little more he might be a nice pickup.

Those last six words summarize the Orioles' off-season so far, other than the addition of McCann: "he might be a nice pickup."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, spiritof66 said:

Those last six words summarize the Orioles' off-season so far, other than the addition of McCann: "he might be a nice pickup."

I think of someone like Diaz more like Mateo than established major league players like Frazier, Gibson, etc.

Unlike with Mateo, we can't throw Diaz out there at the ML level and give him loads of AB's to see if he can find himself.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RZNJ said:

I think of someone like Diaz more like Mateo than established major league players like Frazier, Gibson, etc.

Unlike with Mateo, we can't throw Diaz out there at the ML level and give him loads of AB's to see if he can find himself.   

But Diaz can rack up a ton of ST ABs. Right now our system lacks depth at 1B, C, CF, SP, and LH Reliever. I like Diaz. I like his tools. I just don’t like the idea of having a 1B that has to bat 8th in a lineup when we’re looking to make the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

But Diaz can rack up a ton of ST ABs. Right now our system lacks depth at 1B, C, CF, SP, and LH Reliever. I like Diaz. I like his tools. I just don’t like the idea of having a 1B that has to bat 8th in a lineup when we’re looking to make the playoffs. 

IF he was on the roster, he'd hardly play.   You know Mountcastle is going to play 140-150 games.    Diaz would be a defensive replacement, once a week starter.   They probably prefer to have a veteran in that type of role.   I think they prefer to try and get Diaz to AAA and get him regular AB's in the hope that the light bulb goes on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

IF he was on the roster, he'd hardly play.   You know Mountcastle is going to play 140-150 games.    Diaz would be a defensive replacement, once a week starter.   They probably prefer to have a veteran in that type of role.   I think they prefer to try and get Diaz to AAA and get him regular AB's in the hope that the light bulb goes on.

Why would they keep a second 1B just to play 10-20 games with no other position? I'd rather use the spot on Vavra who can cover additional positions and may be a better hitter given an opportunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Why would they keep a second 1B just to play 10-20 games with no other position? I'd rather use the spot on Vavra who can cover additional positions and may be a better hitter given an opportunity. 

They have no need for a utility player. Vavra can’t play SS at the MLB level. 
 

The other 1B is McCann. Not exactly good to have your backup C be your only 1B option. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eddie83 said:

They have no need for a utility player. Vavra can’t play SS at the MLB level. 
 

The other 1B is McCann. Not exactly good to have your backup C be your only 1B option. 

Urias, Vavra, and Westburg could also play 1B if needed. If Mouncastle is injured and needs to miss a couple weeks we could always call Diaz up. I don't see the need for a dedicated backup defensive 1B taking up a roster spot. I'd rather have a guy who can hit and/or play the field in a variety of positions. As it is Diaz seems like a worse version of Nevin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I still care about wins. I remember following Palmer and others to get to 20 in the 70s. That's one of the things I miss about baseball from those years when all the starting pitchers would have these big win-loss totals in July and beyond. Fingers was talking yesterday about having an 8-man staff in the playoffs one year. I hope Rodriguez can get to 20.  
    • Though there are a lot of outfielders right now I am not sure there will be that many next year.   Santander, Hays and maybe even Mullins may not be on the team.   That leaves Kjerstad probably RF,   Cowser CF depending on if he hits.     Norby, Stowers are probably traded.    Beavers and Fabian are not hitting that well at AA.   They could spend all season next year at AAA.   I could see Mayo at 3B and Westburg in LF.  Not because Westburg isn't a good 3B but because of Mayo, Holliday and Westburg,  I think Westburg would be the best LFer. So I don't really see Kjerstad as expendable.
    • I don’t expect it to happen, but I still always holD out hope for some of the high upside hs bats (Gillen specifically at 22, almost any of them at 32). We really don’t do it, but have really hit when we do (Jackson, Gunnar, Mayo).    id be a bit surprised if Benge is still there, and Honeycutt. 
    • While those three SP are pretty good. The Cubs problem is their bullpen but even more so (like much of MLB) their offense. I'm very confident that we will handle them like we do everyone else.
    • I agree trading Kjerstad is borderline.  I suggested a Kjerstad led deal for Crochet.   Two problems.  Some people don’t think that’s enough and I’m still not confident Elias would do it even if it was enough.   
    • I understand the sentiment, IMO it's just the wrong situation. Teams that are this good, young, and inexpensive should not cast their lot on "cash considerations" kinds of players. We are arguably the best team in baseball with a very legit shot at a title (first in over 40 years). The waiver wire/players who are DFA's is not the way to go this year. Even if an opportunity arises where a useful player like Aaron Hicks becomes available (like he did last year), it is doubtful that we would be high enough in the peaking order to claim such a player (given how good our record is). I don't think you should ever shut yourself off from any avenue of talent acquisition. But I'm curious why you think "the waiver wire"/"bargain bin"/"cash considerations" is the best way to improve the team? 
    • Fortunately, or maybe unfortunately, I was just shy of my 24th birthday and I remember it very well.  😀
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...