Jump to content

Aaron Hicks (Update: Signed by the Orioles to replace Mullins)


cboemmeljr

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

Didn’t see he was… where’d this question come from?

Aguilar was released… which is pretty bad from the worst team in baseball. 

I watch an MLB roster site (MLB RADAR) that has been early and right about these transactions before...  I guess this is a test

They're listing him as DFA

Edited by owknows
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, owknows said:

I watch an MLB roster site that has been early and right about these transactions before...  I guess this is a test

Tomorrow is an off day. Seems very unlikely that the Orioles would cut him loose so fast much less right after a game and before an off day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ohfan67 said:

Tomorrow is an off day. Seems very unlikely that the Orioles would cut him loose so fast much less right after a game and before an off day. 

Yeah.... I'm not judging the merits of it... just saying they have him listed as DFA

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, owknows said:

I watch an MLB roster site (MLB RADAR) that has been early and right about these transactions before...  I guess this is a test

They're listing him as DFA

They also have Grayson and Givens still on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far so good for Hicks. He's certainly making me look wrong for disliking this move.... Which I will gladly accept as long as he keep playing well. Right now, the way things stand, I would advocate for him staying on the roster when Mullins comes back and finding a way to play him against the Yankees.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SilverRocket said:

Hicks has been impressive so far. Even the bad results have been on good at-bats where he's working the count. He had a .330 OBP last year, even if the rest of his bat wasn't good. If he keeps this up, I would prefer him to McKenna as a 4th OF when Mullins is back.

I could be on board with that. Can we have too many LH bats? Maybe it works if Westburg is in the mix?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Hicks has a great rest of the season and he especially crushes the Yankees. But unfortunately he will probably come crashing back to earth soon. I predict the Hicks experiment doesn’t last very long. Not sure how long not very long will be, but I think weeks not months is a good bet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few things on Hicks after hearing Palmer muse on him during the broadcast.

He's not far removed from a pretty solid 2020. He's healthy. He's got play off experience. Even when he was struggling with the Yankees, the OBP was about 100 points hire than the Avg. 

I think he could potentially thrive in a part time role with the O's, especially since he doesn't have the stress of playing up to the contract he had with the Yankees. Maybe he is a true change of venue guy.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Hicks' fielding good enough to cover CF?  I've been unable to watch the last few games.  What are impressions of his defense?  Not sure the O's can carry Hicks and McKenna on the roster long term, although some have said he could take Vavra's place.  He's had an interesting start will be something to watch what the O's will do if his performance craters.  You can't argue he's been a positive on the team so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Is Hicks' fielding good enough to cover CF?  I've been unable to watch the last few games.  What are impressions of his defense?  Not sure the O's can carry Hicks and McKenna on the roster long term, although some have said he could take Vavra's place.  He's had an interesting start will be something to watch what the O's will do if his performance craters.  You can't argue he's been a positive on the team so far.

He's been a CF for most of his career, he is capable of playing competent CF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sydnor said:

Unless he performs absolutely terribly, I’d be very surprised if Hicks was not on the roster for the remainder of the year. First, Elias acknowledged that they were talking to Hicks prior to Mullins sustaining the groin injury.

Second, James McCann has been a right handed DH fairly regularly for the team. Hicks can play right and slide Santander to DH, removing McCann from the lineup. In his career, Hicks has a career 103 WRC+ against left-handed pitchers, and has a 110 WRC+ against them this year. McCann has a career 106 WRC+ against left-handed pitchers, and has a 42 WRC+ against them this year. Although McCann has been slightly better against left-handed pitchers in his career, Hicks has been significantly better in the last 3 years. I would bet on Hicks performing better than McCann.

Third, because they are dealing with players and agents, I just don’t think you sign a guy like Hicks to DFA him as soon as Mullins is healthy or to bring up a prospect from the minors unless he performs poorly. Even then, I could see it being more likely that McKenna (who I like more than most on the Board) is sent down, and Hicks takes over that role with slightly more playing time.

I could be wrong about all of this, but I think that given the above, and that he likely got some assurances when he decided to sign with the Orioles (because he could have waited for a different opportunity), Hicks will be on the roster for the remainder of the season absent extremely poor performance. I tend to think he will perform adequately because he was above replacement level last year and was trending above replacement level in May before NY DFA’d him. As a result, I hope Hicks performs well, and that he will build on the nice start he has had, though I’m certainly not counting on it.

Solid Post Just think it would be Vavra that gets moved aside and not Mckenna.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Is Hicks' fielding good enough to cover CF?  I've been unable to watch the last few games.  What are impressions of his defense?  Not sure the O's can carry Hicks and McKenna on the roster long term, although some have said he could take Vavra's place.  He's had an interesting start will be something to watch what the O's will do if his performance craters.  You can't argue he's been a positive on the team so far.

He made an absolutely phenomenal catch two nights ago in SF. Ran back to the fence and had to jump and twist backward to catch a ball at the wall. One of the finest catches we’ll see this year. I have to admit that it surprised me, and he looked surprised too. I expected him to be injured afterward, but thankfully he was fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, seak05 said:

Mullins, Cowser, and Hicks are all LH. The orioles love having platoon options. I posted this in cowsers’s thread, but I think the most likely demotion right now for Cowser would be Vavra (and then yes he plays LF and santander moves to 1b/dh)

Hicks is a switch hitter. Thats why I think McKenna is the one who could be optioned. Hicks solves the platoon issue and starts in CF against lefties until Cedric is back, and fills in for all of Hays/Cowser/Santander otherwise. I dont know if hes better than McKenna or not, but if the Orioles think he is, then calling up Cowser and allowing HIcks to take over the 4th OF role (that plays more than McKenna) then that is the route that makes the most sense to me. I think having Westburg get innings in the OF as well as obviously being able to play 3B/SS/2B is the potential replacement for Vavra.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • You would think the Rays are going to have a selloff if they aren't playoff team at the deadline.  They stretched their budget this year, and are not going to lose money to miss the playoffs by 2 games. 
    • Trading HK and Norby is leftovers but 4 non-top 100 prospects gets Gausman.  Every market is different, but sounds like your just circling wagons around a cliche.
    • I think you’re having trouble getting an answer because you’re making a comparison that isn’t particularly apt. Grayson is 24 years old. Shōta turns 31 in a couple months, and he’s got 1200+ professional innings on his arm (on top of a full college career). You also have two years of pre-arb left with Grayson, followed by three years of arbitration. Something like 5/$35M. Assuming Shōta’s 2025 option gets exercised (which should be the hope, because it would mean he’s been healthy and pitching like the “ace” that you’re calling him), you’re looking at something in the realm of 4/$70M. So one fewer year at twice the cost. They're not particularly comparable. You’re talking about a kid who has yet to even enter his prime and a veteran who is starting to approach the end of his. The respective returns for the two would presumably be pretty different — and that’s without even addressing the issue that you’d very likely be buying Shōta at the absolute peak of his value right now.
    • I actual prefer a one o’clock game Sunday. We get the extra rest. The Yankees will be playing and then hopping in their beds around 2 AM.
    • What about the Rays? I know it’s hard to trade in division. They need offense and you could kill 2 birds with one stone. Zach Efflin and Jason Adam would solve both starter and bullpen issues. Rays may be extra incentivized to get rid of Efflin contract.
    • Let’s be clear. He’s pitching like an ace THIS YEAR. this is his first year in mlb and he was considered a back end starter when he was signed.  No one rational would say a 2.5 month performance in your first year in MLB requires the number one prospect in baseball PLUS MORE! Respectfully it’s lunacy.
    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...